Super Rugby - Who's it going to be?
-
<p>well resting the players for a week could be good fo rthem, or having a week off might be bad, some teams come off a bye week worse for it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Crusaders should be fine too, they spent alot of last night watching the Canes :fishing:</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="broughie" data-cid="597499" data-time="1468717298"><p>I am not sure the LIons are a pushover. They have learned to run the ball unlike some of the other SA teams with effectiveness. I think it will be a close game.<br></p></blockquote>They are playing the Saders so both teams come into the game off losses, albeit from teams at vastly different positions on the table. Given their history I wouldn't bet on the Lions but the Saders will need to really step it up
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="canefan" data-cid="597507" data-time="1468718407"><p>
They are playing the Saders so both teams come into the game off losses, albeit from teams at vastly different positions on the table. Given their history I wouldn't bet on the Lions but the Saders will need to really step it up</p></blockquote><a class="bbc_url" href="http://www.superxv.com/2016-super-rugby-play-offs-confirmed/">http://www.superxv.com/2016-super-rugby-play-offs-confirmed/</a><br><br>
Just confirmation of times and venues<br><br>
Highlanders Friday half edit: seven<br>
Canes Saturday half seven<br>
Saders half two in the goddamn<br>
Chefs night dark five hundred<br><br><br>
Going to be a busy Sunday morning. How sweet would it be for all the Kiwis to win!<br><br>
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk -
<p>Was trying to figure out who might get to host the final if they make it that far. Canes obviously if they keep winning. Haven't done every single combination but I think these would be the semi finals assuming both Hurricanes and Highlanders win their quarters. Travel factor before the final will be huge.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hurricanes 1 v Crusaders 7</p>
<p>Highlanders 5 v Chiefs 6</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hurricanes 1 v Chiefs 6</p>
<p>Lions 2 v Highlanders 5</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hurricanes 1 v Crusaders 7</p>
<p>Stormers 3 v Highlanders 5</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Hurricanes 1 v Highlanders 5</p>
<p>Lions 2 v Stormers 3</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="nzzp" data-cid="597510" data-time="1468718947"><p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='http://www.superxv.com/2016-super-rugby-play-offs-confirmed/'>http://www.superxv.com/2016-super-rugby-play-offs-confirmed/</a><br><br>Just confirmation of times and venues<br><br>Highlanders Friday half nine</p></blockquote><br>That's half seven.
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="antipodean" data-cid="597514" data-time="1468719552"><p>That's half seven.</p></blockquote>
That is some crazy shit. Thanks for the tip... Six pm kick off in Canberra is half seven NZ time. I am amazed. Broadcasters own this competition.<br><br>
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk -
Seems all a bit odd. Canberra is two hours behind.
-
<p>This was posted on Twitter saying that it comes from the SANZAAR website. I checked and it does.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Times are NZ Times:</p>
<p><img src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cnh9ujHVMAARHtV.jpg" alt="Cnh9ujHVMAARHtV.jpg"></p> -
<p>Think the problem in Canberra is that all three of the Raiders teams are playing at home on the Saturday afternoon with the first game (either Reserve Grade or Holden Cup) kicking of at something like 10.00am. The ground staff need as much time as possible to erase the Super Rugby advertising painted on the field and replace it with the NRL equivalent. I suppose the same goes for the electronic advertising hordings around the grounds as well.</p>
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crash" data-cid="597541" data-time="1468723217">
<div>
<p>I still can't farking belive that for all the NZ teams dominance throughout - we are rewarded with one home quarter :Bang_Head:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yep, it hasn't really dawned on me until just now (I've been catching up on the weekend's rugby as I was flying and then at a wedding Friday and Saturday) how stupid the finals of this conference are. It reminds me of 1994 when top qualifying HB had to travel down to a cold, wet, muddy and windswept Invercargill to play a final despite finishing top of the table because the idiotic NZRU decided that the top of the ladder doesn't get a home final it's just a reverse of the round robin game.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If they wanted to have conferences, and ensure SA teams make the final then just have conference play offs, then semis and then final.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Frank" data-cid="597497" data-time="1468716975"><p>
Surprising they chose Cully as a commentator. It's not like he is brimming with personality.</p></blockquote>
<br>
No, but he's a living legend and AB great. Tbh I rarely listen to what he says. The fact that he's there is more than enough to give me wood. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="597397" data-time="1468701223"><p>They can and like wins, points diff, cards or whatever, if it doesn't work they move to the next decider.<br><br>
IMO beating another team is a much better and fairer way to determine who should sit higher than a points diff in different conferences, especially if they have played.</p></blockquote>
What if it's at least 3 teams on level points? Team A has beaten team B, Team B has beaten team C, team C has beaten A. Someone like Robertson's head would explode. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Crash" data-cid="597541" data-time="1468723217">
<div>
<p>I still can't farking belive that for all the NZ teams dominance throughout - we are rewarded with one home quarter :Bang_Head:</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Yeah, that sucks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But look on the bright side: given that dominance, you should expect everyone to comfortably win, right?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Bones" data-cid="597612" data-time="1468735260">
<div>
<p>What if it's at least 3 teams on level points? Team A has beaten team B, Team B has beaten team C, team C has beaten A. Someone like Robertson's head would explode.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>there aren't, so it isnt relevant...but seriously, well thats when you move to the next decider, but winning a game IMO is the most important decider so should be the first thing you look at, especially in this comp where not everyone plays one another, the fact you have, that match up should take on importance in seperating them if tied.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Wurzel" data-cid="597605" data-time="1468734284">
<div>
<p>Have you ever posted without mentioning Hawkes Bay?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I sincerely hope not, it would be poor form if I didn't. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Whoops, nearly forgot - Hawkes Bay.</p>
