Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby 2023

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.1k Posts 59 Posters 106.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

    funny little comp we have here aye

    12 months ago the table ended up
    Blues
    Crusaders
    Chiefs
    Brumbies
    Canes
    Waratahs
    Red
    Highlanders

    First and third swap, the Drua jump in over the 'landers. Otherwise it's a very familiar story.

    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by KiwiMurph
    #1025

    @mariner4life Another way of looking at it is

    Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.

    This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.

    nzzpN F 2 Replies Last reply
    6
    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

      @mariner4life Another way of looking at it is

      Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.

      This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.

      nzzpN Offline
      nzzpN Offline
      nzzp
      wrote on last edited by
      #1026

      @KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:

      @mariner4life Another way of looking at it is

      Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.

      This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.

      Last year the gap bewteen 1 and 7 was 23 points. This year, 33 points.

      There's a massive gap developing in the comp, it's not healthy, but it ain't going away soon

      1 Reply Last reply
      5
      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

        @mariner4life Another way of looking at it is

        Last year the gap between 7th and 11th was 23 competition points.

        This year the difference between 7th and 11th was 5 competion points.

        F Offline
        F Offline
        frugby
        wrote on last edited by
        #1027

        @KiwiMurph This may be proven totally incorrect, but I'm picking it to be even tighter across the board next year. I do worry about Moana and potentially the Drua, but all of the Australian teams are likely to take a step forward/NZ sides a step back, simply because the carrot of the Lions Tour/Eddie Jones has meant strong player retention.

        Western Force to crack the Top 6, and I think it could well be that they along with another Aussie side (The Tahs?) crack the Top 4. Should be good fun for all.

        KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • F frugby

          @KiwiMurph This may be proven totally incorrect, but I'm picking it to be even tighter across the board next year. I do worry about Moana and potentially the Drua, but all of the Australian teams are likely to take a step forward/NZ sides a step back, simply because the carrot of the Lions Tour/Eddie Jones has meant strong player retention.

          Western Force to crack the Top 6, and I think it could well be that they along with another Aussie side (The Tahs?) crack the Top 4. Should be good fun for all.

          KiwiMurphK Offline
          KiwiMurphK Offline
          KiwiMurph
          wrote on last edited by
          #1028

          @friedrugby I agree with Razor, Leon and Holland moving on plus a high number of NZ Super Rugby mainstays moving on that the NZ teams should come back to the pack next year.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            frugby
            wrote on last edited by
            #1029

            I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.

            2024:
            BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
            CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
            CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
            HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
            HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
            MP: BLU, CHI, HIG

            2023:
            BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
            CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
            CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
            HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
            HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
            MP: CRU, HUR, DRU

            2022:
            BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
            CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
            CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
            HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
            HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
            MP: BLU, CHI, HUR

            HigginsH WingerW 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • F frugby

              I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.

              2024:
              BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
              CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
              CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
              HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
              HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
              MP: BLU, CHI, HIG

              2023:
              BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
              CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
              CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
              HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
              HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
              MP: CRU, HUR, DRU

              2022:
              BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
              CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
              CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
              HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
              HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
              MP: BLU, CHI, HUR

              HigginsH Offline
              HigginsH Offline
              Higgins
              wrote on last edited by
              #1030

              @friedrugby said in Super Rugby 2023:

              I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.

              2024:
              BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
              CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
              CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
              HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
              HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
              MP: BLU, CHI, HIG

              2023:
              BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
              CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
              CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
              HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
              HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
              MP: CRU, HUR, DRU

              2022:
              BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
              CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
              CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
              HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
              HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
              MP: BLU, CHI, HUR

              Watching the Hurricanes playing with themselves might not be a good look!

              ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
              6
              • HigginsH Higgins

                @friedrugby said in Super Rugby 2023:

                I'm Picking that these could be the rivalry games for next year... I can easily see these being tightly contested barring MP, which should hopefully aid the close competition.

                2024:
                BLU: CRU, CHI, MP
                CHI: BLU, HUR, MP
                CRU: BLU, HIG, HUR
                HIG: CRU, HUR, MP
                HUR: CHI, HIG, HUR
                MP: BLU, CHI, HIG

                2023:
                BLU: HUR, HIG, CRU
                CHI: CRU, HUR, HIG
                CRU: BLU, CHI, MP
                HIG: BLU, FOR, CHI
                HUR: BLU, CHI, MP
                MP: CRU, HUR, DRU

                2022:
                BLU: CHI, HIG, MP
                CHI: BLU, CRU, MP
                CRU: CHI, HIG, HUR
                HIG: BLU, CRU, HUR
                HUR: HIG, CRU, MP
                MP: BLU, CHI, HUR

                Watching the Hurricanes playing with themselves might not be a good look!

                ChrisC Offline
                ChrisC Offline
                Chris
                wrote on last edited by
                #1031

                @Higgins

                Yeah, I am not watching that shit.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • kiwi_expatK Offline
                  kiwi_expatK Offline
                  kiwi_expat
                  wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                  #1032

                  SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.

                  When they become a 10 team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.

                  The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.

                  KiwiwombleK StargazerS 2 Replies Last reply
                  2
                  • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                    SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.

                    When they become a 10 team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.

                    The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.

                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                    Kiwiwomble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1033

                    @kiwi_expat i hear the answer that these teams have much bigger squads, does anyone know but big the pro14 squads are?

                    kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • ChrisC Offline
                      ChrisC Offline
                      Chris
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1034

                      English Premiership squad numbers range from 51 at London Irish to 64 at Wasps,
                      13 plus extra players per squad more than SR squads.

                      KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • ChrisC Chris

                        English Premiership squad numbers range from 51 at London Irish to 64 at Wasps,
                        13 plus extra players per squad more than SR squads.

                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        KiwiwombleK Offline
                        Kiwiwomble
                        wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
                        #1035

                        @Chris with our short term injury covers...the highlanders have had 50 by my count this year...so we're not talking an exponentially bigger squad

                        we might be kidding our selves the current squad size is right and we need a complete rethink

                        F ChrisC 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                          @kiwi_expat i hear the answer that these teams have much bigger squads, does anyone know but big the pro14 squads are?

                          kiwi_expatK Offline
                          kiwi_expatK Offline
                          kiwi_expat
                          wrote on last edited by kiwi_expat
                          #1036

                          @Kiwiwomble not sure, I know our CEO's were pushing for more regular season games, think Andrew Hore wanted a 9 month season.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • kiwi_expatK kiwi_expat

                            SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.

                            When they become a 10 team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.

                            The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.

                            StargazerS Offline
                            StargazerS Offline
                            Stargazer
                            wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                            #1037

                            @kiwi_expat said in Super Rugby 2023:

                            SRP currently has 12 teams same as English Premiership in which teams play each other twice (home and away) & I see no reason as to why we shouldn't do the same.

                            When they become a ten-team league next season the English Premiership will still have 18 regular season, 4 more than SRP does.

                            The Top14 remains the outlier with 26 matches - and it doesn't seem to be doing them much harm.

                            That would require:

                            • bigger squads

                            and more importantly:

                            • the competition to start even earlier in Summer, because there's no way the tail end of the SRP competition will be played at the same time as the July test matches (assuming these will continue, even with an overhaul of the international test calendar) and the competition having a break for test matches and then play the final stages of SRP is very unlikely, too.

                            So I see plenty of reason why we shouldn't do the same.

                            I actually find SRP more than long enough. I'm reaching that stage that I'm really looking forward to the NPC and can't wait for SRP to end.

                            kiwi_expatK 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                              @Chris with our short term injury covers...the highlanders have had 50 by my count this year...so we're not talking an exponentially bigger squad

                              we might be kidding our selves the current squad size is right and we need a complete rethink

                              F Offline
                              F Offline
                              frugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1038

                              @Kiwiwomble Squads absolutely need to be bigger... teams shouldn't need to be calling players in as injury cover. As well as having contracted U20 players, I think this should be the rough guide of a 48 man squad:

                              Loosehead Props (4x)
                              Tighthead Props (4x)
                              Hookers (4x)
                              Locks (6x)
                              Loose Forwards (9x)
                              Halfbacks (4x)
                              First Fives (4x)
                              Midfielders (6x)
                              Outside Backs (7x)

                              If they go down this route, the answer is to play more games, and the NPC becomes a feeder competition, that is closer to the Heartland Championship. The current model where there are give or take 450 pro/kind of pro NPC players model is simply too many, and I'm sure in part contributes to the player drain.

                              KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • F frugby

                                @Kiwiwomble Squads absolutely need to be bigger... teams shouldn't need to be calling players in as injury cover. As well as having contracted U20 players, I think this should be the rough guide of a 48 man squad:

                                Loosehead Props (4x)
                                Tighthead Props (4x)
                                Hookers (4x)
                                Locks (6x)
                                Loose Forwards (9x)
                                Halfbacks (4x)
                                First Fives (4x)
                                Midfielders (6x)
                                Outside Backs (7x)

                                If they go down this route, the answer is to play more games, and the NPC becomes a feeder competition, that is closer to the Heartland Championship. The current model where there are give or take 450 pro/kind of pro NPC players model is simply too many, and I'm sure in part contributes to the player drain.

                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                KiwiwombleK Offline
                                Kiwiwomble
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1039

                                @friedrugby i would also say teams should not be able to start injury cover ahead of original squad members, i'd feel like a piece of shit if i made a squad and then someone was brought in to start ahead of me

                                @Stargazer obviously a "9 month season" is a complete rethink of rugby in NZ, NPC would have to become a amature representative comp under super or one of the suggestions like ditching super and elevating 10 NPC teams to a new and improved NPC would have to be adopted

                                question though, can you elaborate more on the "cant wait for one rugby comp to end so i can watch another rugby comp" ?...isn't still the same amount of rugby roughly?

                                StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                  @friedrugby i would also say teams should not be able to start injury cover ahead of original squad members, i'd feel like a piece of shit if i made a squad and then someone was brought in to start ahead of me

                                  @Stargazer obviously a "9 month season" is a complete rethink of rugby in NZ, NPC would have to become a amature representative comp under super or one of the suggestions like ditching super and elevating 10 NPC teams to a new and improved NPC would have to be adopted

                                  question though, can you elaborate more on the "cant wait for one rugby comp to end so i can watch another rugby comp" ?...isn't still the same amount of rugby roughly?

                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  StargazerS Offline
                                  Stargazer
                                  wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                                  #1040

                                  @Kiwiwomble It's not about the number of games, but about the comp. I prefer watching NPC over watching SRP. That's why I disagree with suggestions to ditch the NPC, make it a feeder comp for SRP, ditch provinces from the NPC to make it a 10 team comp etc etc.

                                  KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                    @Chris with our short term injury covers...the highlanders have had 50 by my count this year...so we're not talking an exponentially bigger squad

                                    we might be kidding our selves the current squad size is right and we need a complete rethink

                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    ChrisC Offline
                                    Chris
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1041

                                    @Kiwiwomble

                                    Crusaders have used 48 players squads of 38 are a bit light.

                                    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • StargazerS Stargazer

                                      @Kiwiwomble It's not about the number of games, but about the comp. I prefer watching NPC over watching SRP. That's why I disagree with suggestions to ditch the NPC, make it a feeder comp for SRP, ditch provinces from the NPC to make it a 10 team comp etc etc.

                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      KiwiwombleK Offline
                                      Kiwiwomble
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1042

                                      @Stargazer so, would you look at it a different way, if it was NPC that got given a 9 month full home and away season?

                                      StargazerS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                        @Stargazer so, would you look at it a different way, if it was NPC that got given a 9 month full home and away season?

                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        StargazerS Offline
                                        Stargazer
                                        wrote on last edited by Stargazer
                                        #1043

                                        @Kiwiwomble I'd prefer to keep both competitions. One after the other, just like now. Maybe make NPC a bit longer, so all provinces play each other once, but I see the practical difficulties in that, too.

                                        Edit: what I would like to add is a proper SRP U20 competition (not the way they do it now), although that probably would be bad for local club rugby.

                                        KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ChrisC Chris

                                          @Kiwiwomble

                                          Crusaders have used 48 players squads of 38 are a bit light.

                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54D Offline
                                          Dan54
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1044

                                          @Chris Yep but using 48 players is probably quite a difference to having that many under contract fulltime. Money becomes a huge problem, and before we get into how it works in England etc I not sure we got the coin in the game to go down theuir track. It's not just England, Wales are down to 3 teams etc. Just be careful what we start wishing for.

                                          I do tend to go along with @Stargazer , I think it about long enough, we now have test season coming up followed by NPC, which I like Star, really enjoy, I know it's all just rugby to some, but NPC is OUR rugby!!

                                          ChrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search