Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC Week 1: France v All Blacks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
rwcfranceallblacks
2.1k Posts 112 Posters 247.2k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • BerniesCornerB BerniesCorner

    To have any chance.
    Huge patience. Cut out the 50:50's
    DONT F*CK ABOUT IN OUR OWN HALF. KICK IT!!!
    Pick and goes. We are very good at this.
    Make use of the opponent corners.

    Mistakes so far. No Roigard, too many wingers.

    KiwiwombleK Offline
    KiwiwombleK Offline
    Kiwiwomble
    wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
    #392

    @BerniesCorner said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

    Huge patience. Cut out the 50:50's
    DONT F*CK ABOUT IN OUR OWN HALF. KICK IT!!!

    ....that mean changing our actual gameplan

    we've literally spent the last 6 years developing a game plan of open them up quick from anywhere on the pitch or kick, of bombs and cross field kicks in our own half to catch out the rush and of offloading in and around the tackle

    Windows97W 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      foobaNZ
      wrote on last edited by
      #393

      Can't wrap my head around the Christie selection.

      Passing: Smith > Roigard > Christie
      Speed to ruck: Smith > Roigard > Christie
      Kicking game: Roigard > Smith > Christie
      Running game: Roigard/Smith > Christie
      Defense: Christie > Roigard/Smith

      Not sure the one benefit outweighs the negatives.

      Obviously Roigard only has two caps, but, he could have another 4 before the play offs if we pick him.

      Also - a bit worried about lineout time with that backrow. Finau at 6 would have looked good right now...

      Fortunately French aren't full strength, so, I back us to do the job but it'll need to be done by the starters. If it's close I worry about Christie closing out the game.

      Y 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • BovidaeB Offline
        BovidaeB Offline
        Bovidae
        wrote on last edited by
        #394

        To be optimistic, let's go back to the 2015 RWC.

        The pecking order of the halfbacks at the start was (1) Smith, (2) TJP, (3) TKB. By the time the playoffs started TKB had overtaken TJP to be Smith's backup. There is time for Roigard to prove his worth before the game that really matters.

        F boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • BovidaeB Bovidae

          To be optimistic, let's go back to the 2015 RWC.

          The pecking order of the halfbacks at the start was (1) Smith, (2) TJP, (3) TKB. By the time the playoffs started TKB had overtaken TJP to be Smith's backup. There is time for Roigard to prove his worth before the game that really matters.

          F Offline
          F Offline
          foobaNZ
          wrote on last edited by
          #395

          @Bovidae yea I agree. Just struggling to see how it isn't already obvious to them.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • frugbyF frugby

            @Machpants said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

            @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

            I'm intrigued that people think the non-selection of Roigard is far more important and a bigger talking point than the selection of Papalii on the blindside.

            Also, if anyone lives overseas and can go to the bookmaker, would love to know the odds on Nepo over 2.5 knock-ons. In that heat, he won't catch a thing!

            Because, from the squad, who else do you pick? No neck up six error was made by foster weeks ago, but he's made the back up nine error today

            I think there is a very legitimate conversation about picking Jacobson. Big call to go with three opensides. Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

            DuluthD Offline
            DuluthD Offline
            Duluth
            wrote on last edited by
            #396

            @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

            Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

            It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

            frugbyF 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Offline
              D Offline
              Darren
              wrote on last edited by
              #397

              Winning this games doesn't necessarily give us the easier QF anyway, just creates momentum and confidence.

              KiwiwombleK boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
              4
              • D Darren

                Winning this games doesn't necessarily give us the easier QF anyway, just creates momentum and confidence.

                KiwiwombleK Offline
                KiwiwombleK Offline
                Kiwiwomble
                wrote on last edited by
                #398

                @Darren exactly, loosing tells anyone else theyre in with a sniff and any team has one game where they play above themselves

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                  @BerniesCorner said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                  Huge patience. Cut out the 50:50's
                  DONT F*CK ABOUT IN OUR OWN HALF. KICK IT!!!

                  ....that mean changing our actual gameplan

                  we've literally spent the last 6 years developing a game plan of open them up quick from anywhere on the pitch or kick, of bombs and cross field kicks in our own half to catch out the rush and of offloading in and around the tackle

                  Windows97W Offline
                  Windows97W Offline
                  Windows97
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #399

                  @Kiwiwomble said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                  @BerniesCorner said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                  Huge patience. Cut out the 50:50's
                  DONT F*CK ABOUT IN OUR OWN HALF. KICK IT!!!

                  ....that mean changing our actual gameplan

                  we've literally spent the last 6 years developing a game plan of open them up quick from anywhere on the pitch or kick, of bombs and cross field kicks in our own half to catch out the rush and of offloading in and around the tackle

                  My main gripe with this is that our kicking game, especially in regards to contestable kick's is just plain awful. Half the time it appears that the team doesn't even know a contestable kick is going up (as no-one gets there to put pressure on the receiver).
                  The times where we do appear to know what's going on we send up a couple of people who are invariably outnumbered by the defenders .

                  The concept of picking on a defender who's isolated and putting bodies around them to contest the kick appears to have been lost.

                  If there is a plan I'm finding it very difficult to follow as it appears to be "we haven't gone forward off several rucks I'm going to panic and kick it to the sidelines and hope someone chases".

                  KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • Windows97W Windows97

                    @Kiwiwomble said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                    @BerniesCorner said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                    Huge patience. Cut out the 50:50's
                    DONT F*CK ABOUT IN OUR OWN HALF. KICK IT!!!

                    ....that mean changing our actual gameplan

                    we've literally spent the last 6 years developing a game plan of open them up quick from anywhere on the pitch or kick, of bombs and cross field kicks in our own half to catch out the rush and of offloading in and around the tackle

                    My main gripe with this is that our kicking game, especially in regards to contestable kick's is just plain awful. Half the time it appears that the team doesn't even know a contestable kick is going up (as no-one gets there to put pressure on the receiver).
                    The times where we do appear to know what's going on we send up a couple of people who are invariably outnumbered by the defenders .

                    The concept of picking on a defender who's isolated and putting bodies around them to contest the kick appears to have been lost.

                    If there is a plan I'm finding it very difficult to follow as it appears to be "we haven't gone forward off several rucks I'm going to panic and kick it to the sidelines and hope someone chases".

                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                    KiwiwombleK Offline
                    Kiwiwomble
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #400

                    @Windows97 and sometimes as few as 3 or 4 phases

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4lifeM Offline
                      mariner4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #401

                      so that's it, team is named. come on lads, feed 'em!

                      It's pretty much up to the players now, they are the ones who need to perform. Every single player picked is super experienced, there are zero excuses. Get in and get the job done. It's a cliche, but it's a cliche for a reason, they just need to execute.

                      of the "contentious" selections
                      I've seen DP play huge games in black, he needs to bring that. Basically play like he did against England
                      ALB is the most complete midfielder in the country, so he needs to find a way to contribute that compliments the guy inside him, and the guy outside him.
                      Everyone else would have been picked anyway, so zero reason not to step up.

                      carn the fucking lads!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      12
                      • DuluthD Duluth

                        @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                        Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                        It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                        frugbyF Online
                        frugbyF Online
                        frugby
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #402

                        @Duluth said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                        @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                        Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                        It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                        Paps smaller than Reado? Surely?

                        DuluthD taniwharugbyT R 3 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • FrankF Offline
                          FrankF Offline
                          Frank
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #403

                          Just woke up and read Christie ahead of Roigard.
                          No words.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • frugbyF frugby

                            @Duluth said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                            @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                            Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                            It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                            Paps smaller than Reado? Surely?

                            DuluthD Offline
                            DuluthD Offline
                            Duluth
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #404

                            @frugby

                            Both 1.93m, Read 111kg, Dalton 113kg

                            Sure the stats fluctuate.. but at the very least they are similar.

                            Papali'i is very large openside who started his SR career as a specialist 6

                            KiwiwombleK NepiaN 2 Replies Last reply
                            4
                            • frugbyF frugby

                              @Duluth said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                              @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                              Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                              It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                              Paps smaller than Reado? Surely?

                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugbyT Offline
                              taniwharugby
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #405

                              @frugby according to current stats, they are the same height and DP 2kg heavier...so his size isnt an issue, its how he plays and how they have played him

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • frugbyF frugby

                                @Duluth said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                                It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                                Paps smaller than Reado? Surely?

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                reprobate
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #406

                                @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                @Duluth said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                @frugby said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                Without knowing, I'd suggest this would be the smallest loose forward trio the All Blacks have picked in a WC match since the 90s.

                                It's basically the same size as the Cane/Read/Savea trio that played a few games in the last world cup (Savea at 6)

                                Paps smaller than Reado? Surely?

                                looks a lot smaller, plays much smaller, and a completely different player. Read was a genuine power runner, and a world class lineout option. Dalton, Ardie and Cane are all 7s. Read was an 8 who could have been a decent 6 or even a decent lock.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                6
                                • Victor MeldrewV Victor Meldrew

                                  @akan004 said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                  The Roigard non selection is silly but it also shows how inflexible Foster is. I really don't know why we even bothered having the ABs in SR when clearly form doesn't matter to the guy, he had already picked this AB team at the start of the year.

                                  The same criticism can be made against Henry and Hansen for sticking with Nonu at 12 despite being crap in SR.

                                  FrankF Offline
                                  FrankF Offline
                                  Frank
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #407

                                  @Victor-Meldrew said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                  @akan004 said in RWC: France v All Blacks:

                                  The Roigard non selection is silly but it also shows how inflexible Foster is. I really don't know why we even bothered having the ABs in SR when clearly form doesn't matter to the guy, he had already picked this AB team at the start of the year.

                                  The same criticism can be made against Henry and Hansen for sticking with Nonu at 12 despite being crap in SR.

                                  You're the biggest Foster fluffer in the world.
                                  Comparing Christie to Nonu, you're reaching new lows here bud.

                                  MN5M Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                                  4
                                  • Y Offline
                                    Y Offline
                                    Yeahtheboys
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #408

                                    If anyone, who understands rugby and have watched rugby the last 2 years, still picks Christie ahead of Roigard then they don’t deserve an opinion. Your opinion is invalid. Don’t give one. You don’t have one.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • F foobaNZ

                                      Can't wrap my head around the Christie selection.

                                      Passing: Smith > Roigard > Christie
                                      Speed to ruck: Smith > Roigard > Christie
                                      Kicking game: Roigard > Smith > Christie
                                      Running game: Roigard/Smith > Christie
                                      Defense: Christie > Roigard/Smith

                                      Not sure the one benefit outweighs the negatives.

                                      Obviously Roigard only has two caps, but, he could have another 4 before the play offs if we pick him.

                                      Also - a bit worried about lineout time with that backrow. Finau at 6 would have looked good right now...

                                      Fortunately French aren't full strength, so, I back us to do the job but it'll need to be done by the starters. If it's close I worry about Christie closing out the game.

                                      Y Offline
                                      Y Offline
                                      Yeahtheboys
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #409

                                      @foobaNZ you can’t be saying Aaron smith has the same running game as Roigard. I agree with pretty much all else. Aaron smith is arguably the best halfback of all time. He’s not a world class ball runner at all. That’s not his thing.

                                      taniwharugbyT F Windows97W 3 Replies Last reply
                                      1
                                      • Y Yeahtheboys

                                        @foobaNZ you can’t be saying Aaron smith has the same running game as Roigard. I agree with pretty much all else. Aaron smith is arguably the best halfback of all time. He’s not a world class ball runner at all. That’s not his thing.

                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugby
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #410

                                        @Yeahtheboys I'd say Christie's speed to ruck is up there with Smith too, he seems supremely fit, its the lack of clear decision making once he gets there that lets him down.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • Y Yeahtheboys

                                          @foobaNZ you can’t be saying Aaron smith has the same running game as Roigard. I agree with pretty much all else. Aaron smith is arguably the best halfback of all time. He’s not a world class ball runner at all. That’s not his thing.

                                          F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          foobaNZ
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #411

                                          @Yeahtheboys Roigard does pip him there, you're right. I just didn't want to bring in to question Smith starting as my main point was Roigard > Christie. I still think Smith snipes well though.

                                          Very few half backs score that try Roigard did last test, probably only Dupont.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search