Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC SF: England v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
englandspringboks
1.1k Posts 82 Posters 73.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid SchnitzelR Offline
    Rancid Schnitzel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1084

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Swap RFU with WR.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Rancid SchnitzelR Rancid Schnitzel

      @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

      @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

      @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

      @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

      No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

      I have tried to stay away from this topic.
      But Tom Curry receiving online abuse is shameful and cannot be condoned under any circumstances.

      Equally, the RFU doubling down on the claim of racist behaviour from Bongi when a WR investigation over 5 days and many independent pundit evaluations point to Curry most likely misinterpreting Afrikaans is absolutely shameful too. In my view that RFU statement is disgraceful for that part.

      For context, South Africans are extremely sensitive to racist behaviour which carries all sorts of penalties.
      Equally, a false claim of racist behaviour against someone can also land you with jail time in SA.

      Yes we’ve all seen all the fan videos claiming to exonerate Bongi, except none of them refer to the moment it supposedly happened. People are choosing to believe what they believe based on who they support and then hurling abuse at the person making the complaint.

      We’ve no idea what happened but the investigation so called, didn’t appear to interview either of the only two people who know the truth.

      I’ve also stayed out of it, but the immediate decision that it didn’t happen by most people, and the abuse that followed has just pissed me off. Seems to me that since the same player has been accused before, a proper investigation should have taken place.

      So, World Rugby took circa 5 days to review 2 games and came up with nothing.
      Yet the RFU can outright call Bongi a racist based on what is possibly / probably a misinterpreted Afrikaans phrase / phrases shown to be commonly used by the Boks... and that's ok?

      That's not some arbitrary individual, that's a national governing body of a sport behaving like that.
      With a published, public statement.
      If you want to talk about being pissed off - that's the bit that's got me wound up.

      The RFU can "Choose my side" (google translate to Afrikaans).

      WR were always going to sweep it under the carpet. The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

      boobooB Offline
      boobooB Offline
      booboo
      wrote on last edited by
      #1085

      @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

      The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

      This is a really interesting question.

      There's no reverse of result

      So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

        @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

        The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

        We're talking about the RFU here.
        Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

        CatograndeC Offline
        CatograndeC Offline
        Catogrande
        wrote on last edited by
        #1086

        @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

        @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

        The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

        We're talking about the RFU here.
        Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

        Whilst I agree with you view on the RFU, what makes me wonder is that they have effectively broken ranks with the status quo and that is not really in their DNA.

        Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • SmutsS Offline
          SmutsS Offline
          Smuts
          wrote on last edited by
          #1087

          Because they’re Kants?

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • sparkyS Offline
            sparkyS Offline
            sparky
            wrote on last edited by sparky
            #1088

            Steve Borthwick not happy with World Rugby, accusing them of not following due process. He voices his approval for the RFU statement.

            https://twitter.com/jaredwright17/status/1717518258998305163

            CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sparkyS sparky

              Steve Borthwick not happy with World Rugby, accusing them of not following due process. He voices his approval for the RFU statement.

              https://twitter.com/jaredwright17/status/1717518258998305163

              CatograndeC Offline
              CatograndeC Offline
              Catogrande
              wrote on last edited by
              #1089

              @sparky

              It more and more looks as though there is something that it is felt has not been addressed. Too many people putting their necks on the line for it to be deemed otherwise.

              sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
              5
              • CatograndeC Catogrande

                @sparky

                It more and more looks as though there is something that it is felt has not been addressed. Too many people putting their necks on the line for it to be deemed otherwise.

                sparkyS Offline
                sparkyS Offline
                sparky
                wrote on last edited by
                #1090

                @Catogrande Normally extremely cautious people are going all in here. I’m beginning to wonder if they is a lot more to the story than has been made public.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • SmutsS Offline
                  SmutsS Offline
                  Smuts
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1091

                  There’s less.

                  borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

                  sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • SmutsS Smuts

                    There’s less.

                    borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

                    sparkyS Offline
                    sparkyS Offline
                    sparky
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1092

                    @Smuts said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                    There’s less.

                    borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

                    Not really, Borthwick’s team exceeded expectations at home. Even if his side lose tomorrow night, he can probably negotiate a new contract with the England set-up.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • SmutsS Offline
                      SmutsS Offline
                      Smuts
                      wrote on last edited by Smuts
                      #1093

                      You’ve elided my point.

                      If EJ was still the England coach and they’d choked like that, would the boys at the Telegraph/Mail etc be riding this nonsense or would they be calling the coach out for what was a humiliating failure to adapt to the boks’ in game tactical changes - changes that Borthwick ought to have prepared for.

                      Especially as getting humped at the scrum by the boks is a pro that should’ve been fixed in the four years since 2019.

                      The press is happy - accusing South Africans of racism sells far more papers than dry technical analysis of their shortcomings as a sporting nation.

                      On top of all this, I’d bet dollars to donuts there’s some PR manager pushing this for fear of what ought to be righteous anger at recklessly raising such an insidious allegation.

                      CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • SmutsS Smuts

                        You’ve elided my point.

                        If EJ was still the England coach and they’d choked like that, would the boys at the Telegraph/Mail etc be riding this nonsense or would they be calling the coach out for what was a humiliating failure to adapt to the boks’ in game tactical changes - changes that Borthwick ought to have prepared for.

                        Especially as getting humped at the scrum by the boks is a pro that should’ve been fixed in the four years since 2019.

                        The press is happy - accusing South Africans of racism sells far more papers than dry technical analysis of their shortcomings as a sporting nation.

                        On top of all this, I’d bet dollars to donuts there’s some PR manager pushing this for fear of what ought to be righteous anger at recklessly raising such an insidious allegation.

                        CatograndeC Offline
                        CatograndeC Offline
                        Catogrande
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1094

                        @Smuts

                        I'm guessing the accusation of racism bites deeper for you Saffer brothers and I can understand your reaction but you're conflating two issues which really can't be conflated. Now I'm not saying here that Bongi is guilty (I can't be arsed typing Mbonambi all the time) and it really wouldn't surprise me if the confusion over some Afrikaans terminology is how things happened. My thoughts though are, and leaving aside any sensationalism from the UK press, is that normally staid, toe the line stakeholders like the RFU and Borthwick are not just pissed off but have come out strongly and said as much. These people do not stick their heads over the parapet on a whim. Are they pissed off with Bongi or are they pissed off that WR have not investigated the issue fully - I'd say the latter, but that is just my view of things.

                        As an aside if it turns out that Bongi IS guilty of the racial slur, it should be remembered that it is the actions of an individual and not a team, let alone a nation.

                        SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • W Offline
                          W Offline
                          W32
                          wrote on last edited by W32
                          #1095

                          England claim the moral high ground. What a surprise. The plucky losers treated unfairly by the colonials.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPomM Offline
                            MajorPom
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1096

                            It's quite intriguing this - in a load of bullshit sort of way.

                            First of all, BOK should have dealt with it on the field. Pulled SA in, said the facts they likely would have said they said xxxxx in Afrikaans, no offence intended, BOK, and likely Curry accept it and moved on. Done.

                            However, given this didn't happen and it instead followed the formal procedure then I think due process needs to be followed & England are right to take the moral high ground. Don't agree? Thats fine, but ask yourself if you'd feel the same in the reverse situation where Curry says it.

                            OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • MajorPomM MajorPom

                              It's quite intriguing this - in a load of bullshit sort of way.

                              First of all, BOK should have dealt with it on the field. Pulled SA in, said the facts they likely would have said they said xxxxx in Afrikaans, no offence intended, BOK, and likely Curry accept it and moved on. Done.

                              However, given this didn't happen and it instead followed the formal procedure then I think due process needs to be followed & England are right to take the moral high ground. Don't agree? Thats fine, but ask yourself if you'd feel the same in the reverse situation where Curry says it.

                              OomPBO Offline
                              OomPBO Offline
                              OomPB
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1097

                              @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                              MiketheSnowM CatograndeC MajorPomM D 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • OomPBO OomPB

                                @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnow
                                wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
                                #1098

                                @OomPB said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                What should have happened?

                                Would it have been OK if Curry had responded with 'Shut your mouth you fat b**** c***' ?

                                It was just a sledge after all

                                OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • OomPBO OomPB

                                  @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                  CatograndeC Offline
                                  CatograndeC Offline
                                  Catogrande
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1099

                                  @OomPB

                                  Sadly for us old fellows, the modern game is different.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • OomPBO OomPB

                                    @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                    MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPomM Offline
                                    MajorPom
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1100

                                    @OomPB You'd think the same in the reverse situation?

                                    OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • boobooB booboo

                                      @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                      The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

                                      This is a really interesting question.

                                      There's no reverse of result

                                      So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      W32
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1101

                                      @booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                      @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                      The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

                                      This is a really interesting question.

                                      There's no reverse of result

                                      So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

                                      Or they’re piston wristed gibbons trying to save face

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                        @OomPB You'd think the same in the reverse situation?

                                        OomPBO Offline
                                        OomPBO Offline
                                        OomPB
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1102

                                        @MajorRage Yes I would. Willie is doing this all the time and it pisses me off.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • D Dodge

                                          No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

                                          W Offline
                                          W Offline
                                          W32
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1103

                                          @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                          No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

                                          Do you think WR would have done anything different if the accusation had been the other way around? Online abuse unfortunately is now par for the course, guilty or innocent…. Just ask Cobus Reinach.
                                          You can be forgiven for being a bit one eyed, might be time to move on now ay?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search