Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC SF: England v Springboks

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
englandspringboks
1.1k Posts 82 Posters 73.2k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Billy WebbB Billy Webb

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    CatograndeC Offline
    CatograndeC Offline
    Catogrande
    wrote on last edited by
    #1086

    @Billy-Webb said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

    The big question is why the RFU are doubling down. Could be that they're still salty about the SF, but they really have zero to gain from doing this. Before I was firmly in the camp that it there was nothing in it and that Curry should have focussed on the biggest game of his life and not bad words hurting his feelings. Now I not so sure. Again, why double down?

    We're talking about the RFU here.
    Not really the paragon of a thoughtful well run organization with a bunch of geniuses at the top of late are they?

    Whilst I agree with you view on the RFU, what makes me wonder is that they have effectively broken ranks with the status quo and that is not really in their DNA.

    Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • SmutsS Offline
      SmutsS Offline
      Smuts
      wrote on last edited by
      #1087

      Because they’re Kants?

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • sparkyS Offline
        sparkyS Offline
        sparky
        wrote on last edited by sparky
        #1088

        Steve Borthwick not happy with World Rugby, accusing them of not following due process. He voices his approval for the RFU statement.

        https://twitter.com/jaredwright17/status/1717518258998305163

        CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sparkyS sparky

          Steve Borthwick not happy with World Rugby, accusing them of not following due process. He voices his approval for the RFU statement.

          https://twitter.com/jaredwright17/status/1717518258998305163

          CatograndeC Offline
          CatograndeC Offline
          Catogrande
          wrote on last edited by
          #1089

          @sparky

          It more and more looks as though there is something that it is felt has not been addressed. Too many people putting their necks on the line for it to be deemed otherwise.

          sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
          5
          • CatograndeC Catogrande

            @sparky

            It more and more looks as though there is something that it is felt has not been addressed. Too many people putting their necks on the line for it to be deemed otherwise.

            sparkyS Offline
            sparkyS Offline
            sparky
            wrote on last edited by
            #1090

            @Catogrande Normally extremely cautious people are going all in here. I’m beginning to wonder if they is a lot more to the story than has been made public.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • SmutsS Offline
              SmutsS Offline
              Smuts
              wrote on last edited by
              #1091

              There’s less.

              borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

              sparkyS 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • SmutsS Smuts

                There’s less.

                borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

                sparkyS Offline
                sparkyS Offline
                sparky
                wrote on last edited by
                #1092

                @Smuts said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                There’s less.

                borthwinger is only too keen to keep hiding behind this malicious smokescreen instead of talking about how he was relaxing and congratulating himself at 60 minutes just as the game was turning.

                Not really, Borthwick’s team exceeded expectations at home. Even if his side lose tomorrow night, he can probably negotiate a new contract with the England set-up.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • SmutsS Offline
                  SmutsS Offline
                  Smuts
                  wrote on last edited by Smuts
                  #1093

                  You’ve elided my point.

                  If EJ was still the England coach and they’d choked like that, would the boys at the Telegraph/Mail etc be riding this nonsense or would they be calling the coach out for what was a humiliating failure to adapt to the boks’ in game tactical changes - changes that Borthwick ought to have prepared for.

                  Especially as getting humped at the scrum by the boks is a pro that should’ve been fixed in the four years since 2019.

                  The press is happy - accusing South Africans of racism sells far more papers than dry technical analysis of their shortcomings as a sporting nation.

                  On top of all this, I’d bet dollars to donuts there’s some PR manager pushing this for fear of what ought to be righteous anger at recklessly raising such an insidious allegation.

                  CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • SmutsS Smuts

                    You’ve elided my point.

                    If EJ was still the England coach and they’d choked like that, would the boys at the Telegraph/Mail etc be riding this nonsense or would they be calling the coach out for what was a humiliating failure to adapt to the boks’ in game tactical changes - changes that Borthwick ought to have prepared for.

                    Especially as getting humped at the scrum by the boks is a pro that should’ve been fixed in the four years since 2019.

                    The press is happy - accusing South Africans of racism sells far more papers than dry technical analysis of their shortcomings as a sporting nation.

                    On top of all this, I’d bet dollars to donuts there’s some PR manager pushing this for fear of what ought to be righteous anger at recklessly raising such an insidious allegation.

                    CatograndeC Offline
                    CatograndeC Offline
                    Catogrande
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1094

                    @Smuts

                    I'm guessing the accusation of racism bites deeper for you Saffer brothers and I can understand your reaction but you're conflating two issues which really can't be conflated. Now I'm not saying here that Bongi is guilty (I can't be arsed typing Mbonambi all the time) and it really wouldn't surprise me if the confusion over some Afrikaans terminology is how things happened. My thoughts though are, and leaving aside any sensationalism from the UK press, is that normally staid, toe the line stakeholders like the RFU and Borthwick are not just pissed off but have come out strongly and said as much. These people do not stick their heads over the parapet on a whim. Are they pissed off with Bongi or are they pissed off that WR have not investigated the issue fully - I'd say the latter, but that is just my view of things.

                    As an aside if it turns out that Bongi IS guilty of the racial slur, it should be remembered that it is the actions of an individual and not a team, let alone a nation.

                    SmutsS 1 Reply Last reply
                    6
                    • W Offline
                      W Offline
                      W32
                      wrote on last edited by W32
                      #1095

                      England claim the moral high ground. What a surprise. The plucky losers treated unfairly by the colonials.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • MajorPomM Offline
                        MajorPomM Offline
                        MajorPom
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1096

                        It's quite intriguing this - in a load of bullshit sort of way.

                        First of all, BOK should have dealt with it on the field. Pulled SA in, said the facts they likely would have said they said xxxxx in Afrikaans, no offence intended, BOK, and likely Curry accept it and moved on. Done.

                        However, given this didn't happen and it instead followed the formal procedure then I think due process needs to be followed & England are right to take the moral high ground. Don't agree? Thats fine, but ask yourself if you'd feel the same in the reverse situation where Curry says it.

                        OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • MajorPomM MajorPom

                          It's quite intriguing this - in a load of bullshit sort of way.

                          First of all, BOK should have dealt with it on the field. Pulled SA in, said the facts they likely would have said they said xxxxx in Afrikaans, no offence intended, BOK, and likely Curry accept it and moved on. Done.

                          However, given this didn't happen and it instead followed the formal procedure then I think due process needs to be followed & England are right to take the moral high ground. Don't agree? Thats fine, but ask yourself if you'd feel the same in the reverse situation where Curry says it.

                          OomPBO Offline
                          OomPBO Offline
                          OomPB
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1097

                          @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                          MiketheSnowM CatograndeC MajorPomM D 4 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • OomPBO OomPB

                            @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                            MiketheSnowM Offline
                            MiketheSnowM Offline
                            MiketheSnow
                            wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
                            #1098

                            @OomPB said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                            @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                            What should have happened?

                            Would it have been OK if Curry had responded with 'Shut your mouth you fat b**** c***' ?

                            It was just a sledge after all

                            OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • OomPBO OomPB

                              @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                              CatograndeC Offline
                              CatograndeC Offline
                              Catogrande
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1099

                              @OomPB

                              Sadly for us old fellows, the modern game is different.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • OomPBO OomPB

                                @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                MajorPomM Offline
                                MajorPomM Offline
                                MajorPom
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1100

                                @OomPB You'd think the same in the reverse situation?

                                OomPBO 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • boobooB booboo

                                  @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                  The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

                                  This is a really interesting question.

                                  There's no reverse of result

                                  So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

                                  W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  W32
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1101

                                  @booboo said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                  @Rancid-Schnitzel said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                  The big question is why the RFU are doubling down.

                                  This is a really interesting question.

                                  There's no reverse of result

                                  So there seems to be some thought of protecting their guy. They really think they're right.

                                  Or they’re piston wristed gibbons trying to save face

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                    @OomPB You'd think the same in the reverse situation?

                                    OomPBO Offline
                                    OomPBO Offline
                                    OomPB
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1102

                                    @MajorRage Yes I would. Willie is doing this all the time and it pisses me off.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Dodge

                                      No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

                                      W Offline
                                      W Offline
                                      W32
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1103

                                      @Dodge said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                      No due process, repeat accusation, can only imagine the gnashing of teeth if the accusation had been the other way around. The abuse Tom Curry has received online is shameful

                                      Do you think WR would have done anything different if the accusation had been the other way around? Online abuse unfortunately is now par for the course, guilty or innocent…. Just ask Cobus Reinach.
                                      You can be forgiven for being a bit one eyed, might be time to move on now ay?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                                        @OomPB said in RWC SF: England v Springboks:

                                        @MajorRage Curry acted like a spoiled brat to be honest. Rugby players is suppose to play harder when they get sledged not run to the ref and have a moan. What happens on the field should stay on the field.

                                        What should have happened?

                                        Would it have been OK if Curry had responded with 'Shut your mouth you fat b**** c***' ?

                                        It was just a sledge after all

                                        OomPBO Offline
                                        OomPBO Offline
                                        OomPB
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1104

                                        @MiketheSnow Pretty sure his Saffer team mates have learn him the right sledge words like Coenie Oosthuizen.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          junior
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1105
                                          This post is deleted!
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search