Aussie Summer of Cricket
-
Ridiculous decision by the video umpire to overturn the onfield decision on meagre evidence. Pakistan were robbed there.
-
@sparky Rubbish. Hot spot showed a mark on his glove, as did snicko and the general footage.
-
@KiwiMurph Hit his arm. They took a long time looking at that and nothing clearly suggested glove.
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Hit his arm. They took a long time looking at that and nothing clearly suggested glove.
It clearly showed it hit him on the wrist conected to the glove. Out.
-
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Hit his arm. They took a long time looking at that and nothing clearly suggested glove.
It clearly showed it hit him on the wrist conected to the glove. Out.
-
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
It's part of the glove though, right?
-
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
It's part of the glove though, right?
@NTA said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
It's part of the glove though, right?
It is. You might not like the rule but it's out.
-
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
It's part of the glove though, right?
-
@NTA said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
@KiwiMurph Wrist should be not out.
It's part of the glove though, right?
It is. You might not like the rule but it's out.
@KiwiMurph Bottom line, it was given out.
But 1. no clear evidence that it was the band. 2. The third umpire took about five minutes to make that decision.
If there is that much doubt, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the batsman and the onfield umpire.
But hey, the video official is king these days
-
@KiwiMurph Bottom line, it was given out.
But 1. no clear evidence that it was the band. 2. The third umpire took about five minutes to make that decision.
If there is that much doubt, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the batsman and the onfield umpire.
But hey, the video official is king these days
@sparky said in Aussie Summer of Cricket:
But 1. no clear evidence that it was the band. 2. The third umpire took about five minutes to make that decision.
The third umpire took about 5 minutes because it essentially decided the test. We'll have to agree to disagree. To me there was ample evidence to be given out.
