Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby 2024

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.3k Posts 70 Posters 137.6k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KruseK Kruse

    @Tim said in Super Rugby 2024:

    Clipboard_03-24-2024_01.png

    Fuck me - that says a lot.
    A team with a 0-5 start to the season - are favourites over any arsetralian team.

    BonesB Offline
    BonesB Offline
    Bones
    wrote on last edited by
    #831

    @Kruse said in Super Rugby 2024:

    @Tim said in Super Rugby 2024:

    Clipboard_03-24-2024_01.png

    Fuck me - that says a lot.
    A team with a 0-5 start to the season - are favourites over any arsetralian team.

    In what country though?

    KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • BonesB Bones

      @Kruse said in Super Rugby 2024:

      @Tim said in Super Rugby 2024:

      Clipboard_03-24-2024_01.png

      Fuck me - that says a lot.
      A team with a 0-5 start to the season - are favourites over any arsetralian team.

      In what country though?

      KruseK Offline
      KruseK Offline
      Kruse
      wrote on last edited by
      #832

      @Bones As in - odds in NZ favor NZ teams?
      Checking international sites - it's pretty much the same.
      Pretty sad indictment on Oz teams, and an impressive reputation for the dockers.

      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • KruseK Kruse

        @Bones As in - odds in NZ favor NZ teams?
        Checking international sites - it's pretty much the same.
        Pretty sad indictment on Oz teams, and an impressive reputation for the dockers.

        BonesB Offline
        BonesB Offline
        Bones
        wrote on last edited by
        #833

        @Kruse that is interesting. Odds don't necessarily reflect the actual likelihood though do they? Just the best way for the agency to make money. I have zero idea on sports betting though so likely wrong.

        KruseK 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • BonesB Bones

          @Kruse that is interesting. Odds don't necessarily reflect the actual likelihood though do they? Just the best way for the agency to make money. I have zero idea on sports betting though so likely wrong.

          KruseK Offline
          KruseK Offline
          Kruse
          wrote on last edited by
          #834

          @Bones Yeah - odds are pretty much just "how does the bookie maximise their chances of profit".

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4lifeC Online
            Canes4life
            wrote on last edited by Canes4life
            #835

            A few of the key stats to start the year make for interesting reading.

            Tries:
            Hurricanes: 26 (2nd)
            Chiefs: 21 (3rd=)
            Blues: 18 (6th)
            Highlanders: 17 (7th equal)
            Crusaders: 10 (12th)

            Clean breaks
            Hurricanes: 45 (1st)
            Chiefs: 44 (2nd)
            Blues: 33 (4th)
            Crusaders: 22 (11th equal)
            Highlanders: 22 (11th equal)

            Carries
            Blues: 715 (1st)
            Hurricanes: 683 (2nd)
            Highlanders: 587 (5th)
            Chiefs: 568: (7th)
            Crusaders 480 (12th)

            Metres gained
            Hurricanes: 2,952 (1st)
            Blues: 2,845 (2nd)
            Chiefs: 2,762 (3rd)
            Highlanders: 2,216 (9th)
            Crusaders: 1,714 (12th)

            Defenders beaten
            Hurricanes: 172 (1st)
            Blues: 153 (2nd)
            Highlanders: 143 (4th)
            Chiefs: 136 (5th)
            Crusaders: 84 (12th)

            Tackles won %
            Hurricanes: 88% (2nd)
            Highlanders: 87.7% (3rd)
            Chiefs: 87.5% (4th)
            Blues: 84.4% (6th)
            Crusaders: 83.8% (5th)

            Lineouts won %
            Blues: 90.5% (1st)
            Hurricanes: 88.9% (2nd)
            Chiefs: 86.9% (4th)
            Highlanders: 84.9% (9th)
            Crusaders: 71.6% (12th)

            Scrum won %
            Chiefs: 86% (2nd equal)
            Crusaders: 86% (2nd equal)
            Hurricanes: 83% (4th)
            Highlanders: 71% (11th)
            Blues: 68% (12th)

            Rucks won %
            Hurricanes 97% (1st equal)
            Crusaders 97% (1st equal)
            Blues 97% (1st equal)
            Chiefs 97% (1st equal)
            Highlanders 96% (5th equal)

            Yellow cards
            Crusaders: 5 (1st)
            Blues: 3 (4th equal)
            Highlanders: 3 (4th equal)
            Chiefs: 2 (8th equal)
            Hurricanes: 1 (12th)

            BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • Dan54D Dan54

              I understand the chat about Jaguares etc, just feels like we kicking over Rebels carcass before it dead though.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              DaGrubster
              wrote on last edited by
              #836

              @Dan54

              The way the Rebels are playing, I think they know they are dead men mauling!

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                A few of the key stats to start the year make for interesting reading.

                Tries:
                Hurricanes: 26 (2nd)
                Chiefs: 21 (3rd=)
                Blues: 18 (6th)
                Highlanders: 17 (7th equal)
                Crusaders: 10 (12th)

                Clean breaks
                Hurricanes: 45 (1st)
                Chiefs: 44 (2nd)
                Blues: 33 (4th)
                Crusaders: 22 (11th equal)
                Highlanders: 22 (11th equal)

                Carries
                Blues: 715 (1st)
                Hurricanes: 683 (2nd)
                Highlanders: 587 (5th)
                Chiefs: 568: (7th)
                Crusaders 480 (12th)

                Metres gained
                Hurricanes: 2,952 (1st)
                Blues: 2,845 (2nd)
                Chiefs: 2,762 (3rd)
                Highlanders: 2,216 (9th)
                Crusaders: 1,714 (12th)

                Defenders beaten
                Hurricanes: 172 (1st)
                Blues: 153 (2nd)
                Highlanders: 143 (4th)
                Chiefs: 136 (5th)
                Crusaders: 84 (12th)

                Tackles won %
                Hurricanes: 88% (2nd)
                Highlanders: 87.7% (3rd)
                Chiefs: 87.5% (4th)
                Blues: 84.4% (6th)
                Crusaders: 83.8% (5th)

                Lineouts won %
                Blues: 90.5% (1st)
                Hurricanes: 88.9% (2nd)
                Chiefs: 86.9% (4th)
                Highlanders: 84.9% (9th)
                Crusaders: 71.6% (12th)

                Scrum won %
                Chiefs: 86% (2nd equal)
                Crusaders: 86% (2nd equal)
                Hurricanes: 83% (4th)
                Highlanders: 71% (11th)
                Blues: 68% (12th)

                Rucks won %
                Hurricanes 97% (1st equal)
                Crusaders 97% (1st equal)
                Blues 97% (1st equal)
                Chiefs 97% (1st equal)
                Highlanders 96% (5th equal)

                Yellow cards
                Crusaders: 5 (1st)
                Blues: 3 (4th equal)
                Highlanders: 3 (4th equal)
                Chiefs: 2 (8th equal)
                Hurricanes: 1 (12th)

                BonesB Offline
                BonesB Offline
                Bones
                wrote on last edited by
                #837

                @Canes4life I certainly wouldn't have picked that the highlanders are nigh on the worst in scrums and lose 3 in 10.

                Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • BonesB Bones

                  @Canes4life I certainly wouldn't have picked that the highlanders are nigh on the worst in scrums and lose 3 in 10.

                  Canes4lifeC Online
                  Canes4lifeC Online
                  Canes4life
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #838

                  @Bones I thought the Canes would have been a bit better than 83% aswell. I feel like most teams would strive to be around that 90% mark but some of the rulings are inconsistent these days so it's hard to be perfect.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • DuluthD Offline
                    DuluthD Offline
                    Duluth
                    wrote on last edited by Duluth
                    #839

                    From Mark Robinson

                    “Super Rugby certainly has been amazing. We’ve just had an update from Sky around broadcast numbers and, as an example, round 4 in comparison with last year was up 25%. So we’re sensing overall viewership is strong, and sentiment around the competition is positive
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • BonesB Offline
                      BonesB Offline
                      Bones
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #840

                      Saders in good company. On course to make the final.

                      In 2025.

                      FB_IMG_1711363222035.jpg

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • BonesB Bones

                        Saders in good company. On course to make the final.

                        In 2025.

                        FB_IMG_1711363222035.jpg

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Machpants
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #841

                        @Bones said in Super Rugby 2024:

                        Saders in good company. On course to make the final.

                        In 2025.

                        FB_IMG_1711363222035.jpg

                        I was sure there were 5 NZ teams...

                        Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Machpants

                          @Bones said in Super Rugby 2024:

                          Saders in good company. On course to make the final.

                          In 2025.

                          FB_IMG_1711363222035.jpg

                          I was sure there were 5 NZ teams...

                          Canes4lifeC Online
                          Canes4lifeC Online
                          Canes4life
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #842

                          @Machpants the Hurricanes have never stooped this low. 😁

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mariner4lifeM Online
                            mariner4lifeM Online
                            mariner4life
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #843

                            The Hurricanes are the very definition of "mid"

                            Just so very average. No startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess"

                            The vanilla ice cream of Super Rugby teams.

                            canefanC Canes4lifeC 2 Replies Last reply
                            3
                            • KiwiwombleK Online
                              KiwiwombleK Online
                              Kiwiwomble
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #844

                              probably still better than us

                              normally below average. several startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess compared to aussie teams"

                              mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                probably still better than us

                                normally below average. several startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess compared to aussie teams"

                                mariner4lifeM Online
                                mariner4lifeM Online
                                mariner4life
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #845

                                @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:

                                probably still better than us

                                normally below average. several startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess compared to aussie teams"

                                you guys are like maccas, it's more a surprise when it's good than bad

                                KiwiwombleK A 2 Replies Last reply
                                3
                                • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                  @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:

                                  probably still better than us

                                  normally below average. several startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess compared to aussie teams"

                                  you guys are like maccas, it's more a surprise when it's good than bad

                                  KiwiwombleK Online
                                  KiwiwombleK Online
                                  Kiwiwomble
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #846

                                  @mariner4life i hoestly dont know how to take that :cat_face_with_tears_of_joy:

                                  mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • KiwiwombleK Kiwiwomble

                                    @mariner4life i hoestly dont know how to take that :cat_face_with_tears_of_joy:

                                    mariner4lifeM Online
                                    mariner4lifeM Online
                                    mariner4life
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #847

                                    @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:

                                    @mariner4life i hoestly dont know how to take that :cat_face_with_tears_of_joy:

                                    with fries

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    7
                                    • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                      @Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2024:

                                      probably still better than us

                                      normally below average. several startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess compared to aussie teams"

                                      you guys are like maccas, it's more a surprise when it's good than bad

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      African Monkey
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #848

                                      @mariner4life Blues? Chiefs? Crusaders?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • mariner4lifeM Online
                                        mariner4lifeM Online
                                        mariner4life
                                        wrote on last edited by mariner4life
                                        #849

                                        oh the Blues are for sure KFC. Every time, every fucking time you think it's gonna be amazing. And then it disappoints you, and you sorta feel sick after.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        10
                                        • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                                          The Hurricanes are the very definition of "mid"

                                          Just so very average. No startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess"

                                          The vanilla ice cream of Super Rugby teams.

                                          canefanC Online
                                          canefanC Online
                                          canefan
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #850

                                          @mariner4life said in Super Rugby 2024:

                                          The Hurricanes are the very definition of "mid"

                                          Just so very average. No startling failures, only 1 success. Year after year after year of just being "okay, i guess"

                                          The vanilla ice cream of Super Rugby teams.

                                          I disagree with the vanilla analogy. Over the years we have played some of the most exciting backline rugby of any team. Of course we had our down years. But I think our lack of solid tight 5 and quality 10, and our mental inconsistency have been our Achilles heel

                                          Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search