Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Highlanders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlandershurricanes
233 Posts 35 Posters 10.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4lifeC Offline
    Canes4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #204

    Fantastic game by the Canes. They are going to take some beating.

    Hopefully Roigard isn’t as bad a we think but I think he’ll be gone for the season.

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • Jailbreak7J Offline
      Jailbreak7J Offline
      Jailbreak7
      wrote on last edited by
      #205

      Just hope Roigard's injury is not as bad as first looks.

      antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
      7
      • Jailbreak7J Jailbreak7

        Just hope Roigard's injury is not as bad as first looks.

        antipodeanA Online
        antipodeanA Online
        antipodean
        wrote on last edited by
        #206

        @Jailbreak7 said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

        Just hope Roigard's injury is not as bad as first looks.

        A mate dislocated his kneecap last weekend. Tore tendons as a result, so it can be a long recovery. Hopefully not that bad for Cam.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          akan004
          wrote on last edited by akan004
          #207

          If it's a dislocated kneecap then he could be out for about 8 weeks. Not the best news for the Hurricanes but he should be back for the playoffs.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • Dan54D Offline
            Dan54D Offline
            Dan54
            wrote on last edited by
            #208

            F*** me that was pretty good.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              frugby
              wrote on last edited by
              #209

              I don't even want to think about that game. Holy shit it was bad, Patchell dropped a performance worse than anything Mitch Hunt ever served up - and that is saying something.

              Folau Fakatava about the only positive, I thought amongst that shit show he was really good.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • sparkyS Offline
                sparkyS Offline
                sparky
                wrote on last edited by
                #210

                Good news, a great performance and another win.

                Less good news, Roigard's injury.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • S Offline
                  S Offline
                  SouthernMann
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #211

                  I had a feeling a toweling was coming. But, tried to talk this into being a banana skin game for the Canes. It certainly wasn't. The most disappointing aspect to the game was the shoddy attitude to defence and breakdowns in the first 30. Just really untidy. Patchell's honeymoon seems over. His flat passing at the line created some opps in the first few games. Now it seems easily read. For all of Gilbert's physical attributes, he lacks the ability to do much at speed. Struggles to change direction and gets found out in D. Fakatava was great. Harmon tried really hard. Naholo out Tavatavanawai'd Tavatavanawai. Some of our guys could develop well around talented veterans. They are judt having to carry too much.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • YeetyaahY Offline
                    YeetyaahY Offline
                    Yeetyaah
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #212

                    Tyrel is a well spoken lad, for some reason I expected him to sound like a meathead.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • Canes4lifeC Offline
                      Canes4lifeC Offline
                      Canes4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #213

                      The one silver lining for the Canes with Cam’s injury is that TJ gets plenty of opportunity to push his case to be the AB starter again and then we have a young gun in Jordi Vijoen waiting in the wings. Not all doom and gloom.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                        @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                        Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                        The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                        DamoD Offline
                        DamoD Offline
                        Damo
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #214

                        @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                        @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                        Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                        The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                        They should just copy the cricket law.

                        Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                        Simple, easy and done.

                        antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • DamoD Damo

                          @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                          @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                          Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                          The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                          They should just copy the cricket law.

                          Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                          Simple, easy and done.

                          antipodeanA Online
                          antipodeanA Online
                          antipodean
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #215

                          @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                          @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                          @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                          Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                          The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                          They should just copy the cricket law.

                          Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                          Simple, easy and done.

                          I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                          DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • antipodeanA antipodean

                            @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                            The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                            They should just copy the cricket law.

                            Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                            Simple, easy and done.

                            I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                            DamoD Offline
                            DamoD Offline
                            Damo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #216

                            @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                            Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                            The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                            They should just copy the cricket law.

                            Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                            Simple, easy and done.

                            I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                            I think the point of that particular law is that the moment the ball is touched it is simultaneously a try and in touch, so it is defendable in principle.

                            I refereed for 13 odd years and never struck it once. I don't think it is big on the list of priorities.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • DuluthD Offline
                              DuluthD Offline
                              Duluth
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #217

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                SBW1
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #218

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • boobooB Online
                                  boobooB Online
                                  booboo
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #219

                                  Remember those days when we were kids and one team was so far ahead they'd swap the backs and forwards for the second half? ...

                                  20240330_184924.jpg

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  5
                                  • BerniesCornerB Offline
                                    BerniesCornerB Offline
                                    BerniesCorner
                                    wrote on last edited by BerniesCorner
                                    #220

                                    Didn't see the game. Hopefully injury not serious.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      Old Samurai Jack
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #221

                                      Bloody hell! Little Clan no-nothing shithead injures Roigard! (And I am a Clan supporter!) Shittings!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • TimT Away
                                        TimT Away
                                        Tim
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #222

                                        Hurricanes coach Clark Laidlaw was delighted with the Hurricanes’ performance but admitted that Roigard’s injury put a dampener on the evening.

                                        “Injuries are part of the game,” he said. “It’s hugely disappointing for him, not just us.

                                        “We're not really sure what he's done, but we'll get that assessed.

                                        “He went to hospital to get X-rays and get it checked, so we'll find out tonight or tomorrow morning.

                                        “It’s always a little bit sad to see one of your best players pick up what looks like a serious injury.

                                        “...it’s maybe a patella tendon, but takes a lot for for Cam to stay down. He's a pretty tough bugger, so he was obviously sore.

                                        “Hopefully it's not as serious as it would look like.”

                                        https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/350230884/hurricanes-lose-cam-roigard-huge-blow-super-rugby-hopes

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Jailbreak7J Offline
                                          Jailbreak7J Offline
                                          Jailbreak7
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #223

                                          Far out that frickin ref should face some kind of censure for wrecking the season of our most gun player. He definitely got in Roigard's path.

                                          Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search