Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Highlanders v Hurricanes

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
highlandershurricanes
233 Posts 35 Posters 10.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Away
    A Away
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #207

    If it's a dislocated kneecap then he could be out for about 8 weeks. Not the best news for the Hurricanes but he should be back for the playoffs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • Dan54D Offline
      Dan54D Offline
      Dan54
      wrote on last edited by
      #208

      F*** me that was pretty good.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        frugby
        wrote on last edited by
        #209

        I don't even want to think about that game. Holy shit it was bad, Patchell dropped a performance worse than anything Mitch Hunt ever served up - and that is saying something.

        Folau Fakatava about the only positive, I thought amongst that shit show he was really good.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • sparkyS Offline
          sparkyS Offline
          sparky
          wrote on last edited by
          #210

          Good news, a great performance and another win.

          Less good news, Roigard's injury.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            SouthernMann
            wrote on last edited by
            #211

            I had a feeling a toweling was coming. But, tried to talk this into being a banana skin game for the Canes. It certainly wasn't. The most disappointing aspect to the game was the shoddy attitude to defence and breakdowns in the first 30. Just really untidy. Patchell's honeymoon seems over. His flat passing at the line created some opps in the first few games. Now it seems easily read. For all of Gilbert's physical attributes, he lacks the ability to do much at speed. Struggles to change direction and gets found out in D. Fakatava was great. Harmon tried really hard. Naholo out Tavatavanawai'd Tavatavanawai. Some of our guys could develop well around talented veterans. They are judt having to carry too much.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • YeetyaahY Online
              YeetyaahY Online
              Yeetyaah
              wrote on last edited by
              #212

              Tyrel is a well spoken lad, for some reason I expected him to sound like a meathead.

              1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • Canes4lifeC Offline
                Canes4lifeC Offline
                Canes4life
                wrote on last edited by
                #213

                The one silver lining for the Canes with Cam’s injury is that TJ gets plenty of opportunity to push his case to be the AB starter again and then we have a young gun in Jordi Vijoen waiting in the wings. Not all doom and gloom.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • antipodeanA antipodean

                  @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                  Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                  The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                  DamoD Offline
                  DamoD Offline
                  Damo
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #214

                  @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                  @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                  Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                  The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                  They should just copy the cricket law.

                  Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                  Simple, easy and done.

                  antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • DamoD Damo

                    @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                    @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                    Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                    The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                    They should just copy the cricket law.

                    Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                    Simple, easy and done.

                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodeanA Offline
                    antipodean
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #215

                    @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                    @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                    @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                    Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                    The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                    They should just copy the cricket law.

                    Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                    Simple, easy and done.

                    I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                    DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • antipodeanA antipodean

                      @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                      The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                      They should just copy the cricket law.

                      Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                      Simple, easy and done.

                      I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                      DamoD Offline
                      DamoD Offline
                      Damo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #216

                      @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      @Damo said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      @antipodean said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      @Machpants said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                      Such a stupid rule you can jump from out of the field of play, and take ball back in

                      The plane of touch must be the most confusing area of law in the game. So easy to simplify IMO.

                      They should just copy the cricket law.

                      Ball is out if it touches the ground or something touching the ground over the sideline, or it touches a player that started from outside the field of play.

                      Simple, easy and done.

                      I think for consistency they'd have to address the ability of a player out of the field of play to score a try too.

                      I think the point of that particular law is that the moment the ball is touched it is simultaneously a try and in touch, so it is defendable in principle.

                      I refereed for 13 odd years and never struck it once. I don't think it is big on the list of priorities.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • DuluthD Offline
                        DuluthD Offline
                        Duluth
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #217

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Offline
                          S Offline
                          SBW1
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #218

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • boobooB Online
                            boobooB Online
                            booboo
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #219

                            Remember those days when we were kids and one team was so far ahead they'd swap the backs and forwards for the second half? ...

                            20240330_184924.jpg

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            5
                            • BerniesCornerB Offline
                              BerniesCornerB Offline
                              BerniesCorner
                              wrote on last edited by BerniesCorner
                              #220

                              Didn't see the game. Hopefully injury not serious.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O Offline
                                O Offline
                                Old Samurai Jack
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #221

                                Bloody hell! Little Clan no-nothing shithead injures Roigard! (And I am a Clan supporter!) Shittings!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                2
                                • TimT Away
                                  TimT Away
                                  Tim
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #222

                                  Hurricanes coach Clark Laidlaw was delighted with the Hurricanes’ performance but admitted that Roigard’s injury put a dampener on the evening.

                                  “Injuries are part of the game,” he said. “It’s hugely disappointing for him, not just us.

                                  “We're not really sure what he's done, but we'll get that assessed.

                                  “He went to hospital to get X-rays and get it checked, so we'll find out tonight or tomorrow morning.

                                  “It’s always a little bit sad to see one of your best players pick up what looks like a serious injury.

                                  “...it’s maybe a patella tendon, but takes a lot for for Cam to stay down. He's a pretty tough bugger, so he was obviously sore.

                                  “Hopefully it's not as serious as it would look like.”

                                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/350230884/hurricanes-lose-cam-roigard-huge-blow-super-rugby-hopes

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Jailbreak7J Offline
                                    Jailbreak7J Offline
                                    Jailbreak7
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #223

                                    Far out that frickin ref should face some kind of censure for wrecking the season of our most gun player. He definitely got in Roigard's path.

                                    Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Canes4lifeC Offline
                                      Canes4lifeC Offline
                                      Canes4life
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #224

                                      Vote for your Canes MOTM here - https://www.forum.thesilverfern.com/topic/6596/hurricanes-motm-vs-highlanders

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Jailbreak7J Jailbreak7

                                        Far out that frickin ref should face some kind of censure for wrecking the season of our most gun player. He definitely got in Roigard's path.

                                        Dan54D Offline
                                        Dan54D Offline
                                        Dan54
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #225

                                        @Jailbreak7 said in Highlanders v Hurricanes:

                                        Far out that frickin ref should face some kind of censure for wrecking the season of our most gun player. He definitely got in Roigard's path.

                                        That's stretching it a bit isn't it? Ref didn't injure him!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • WingerW Offline
                                          WingerW Offline
                                          Winger
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #226

                                          Just watching the game now

                                          Weird 2nd try by the Highlanders. In that it wasn't one

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search