QF - Chiefs v Reds
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Aus teams are 0/16 in NZ during finals so basically anything short of a top 2 finish guarantees an NZ series win. Anything short of a top 4 finish guarantees a quarter final exit.
I hear you. I guess my point is that this Reds I think can improve. They've shown they can foot it with nz teams during regular season. Now they need to take the next step.
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Aus teams are 0/16 in NZ during finals so basically anything short of a top 2 finish guarantees an NZ series win. Anything short of a top 4 finish guarantees a quarter final exit.
I hear you. I guess my point is that this Reds I think can improve. They've shown they can foot it with nz teams during regular season. Now they need to take the next step.
They also utterly shit the bed against the Force ...
-
@Yeetyaah said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Mr-Fish said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Wouldn't be opposed to a back three selection of:
Clarke, Narawa, Tele'a, Nanai-Seturo, Love
So you’re leaving out the best wing in the comp?
Fark me go circle jerk in the Canes thread. Up the Rebels.
I was talking about Sevu Reece, a Crusader…
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Yeetyaah said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Mr-Fish said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Wouldn't be opposed to a back three selection of:
Clarke, Narawa, Tele'a, Nanai-Seturo, Love
So you’re leaving out the best wing in the comp?
Fark me go circle jerk in the Canes thread. Up the Rebels.
I was talking about Sevu Reece, a Crusader…
Nah mate, he's off to the Canes next year. Source: I dreamed it
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Hope Razor is watching Finau
Pick any of your top 3 in any position, Razor.
Wallabies won't get within 20
-
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Hope Razor is watching Finau
Pick any of your top 3 in any position, Razor.
Wallabies won't get within 20
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Hope Razor is watching Finau
Pick any of your top 3 in any position, Razor.
Wallabies won't get within 20
I'm interested in tier 1 opposition
-
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Hope Razor is watching Finau
Pick any of your top 3 in any position, Razor.
Wallabies won't get within 20
I'm interested in tier 1 opposition
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@NTA said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Hope Razor is watching Finau
Pick any of your top 3 in any position, Razor.
Wallabies won't get within 20
I'm interested in tier 1 opposition
You won't get it here
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@KiwiMurph Aus teams are 0/16 in NZ during finals so basically anything short of a top 2 finish guarantees an NZ series win. Anything short of a top 4 finish guarantees a quarter final exit.
I hear you. I guess my point is that this Reds I think can improve. They've shown they can foot it with nz teams during regular season. Now they need to take the next step.
-
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
You do go on a bit.
If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.
-
-
Chiefs should ring the changes
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Chiefs should ring the changes
Think they've only got one or two left?
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
You do go on a bit.
If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.
