Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

QF - Chiefs v Reds

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
chiefsreds
227 Posts 34 Posters 6.3k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Fish
    wrote on last edited by
    #162

    Looks like Poihipi has moved into 10.

    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

      @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

      @KiwiMurph Aus teams are 0/16 in NZ during finals so basically anything short of a top 2 finish guarantees an NZ series win. Anything short of a top 4 finish guarantees a quarter final exit.

      I hear you. I guess my point is that this Reds I think can improve. They've shown they can foot it with nz teams during regular season. Now they need to take the next step.

      H Offline
      H Offline
      Horatio
      wrote on last edited by
      #163

      Maybe.. doesn't make for a watchable finals series now though, sadly.

      KiwiMurphK Landers92L 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        Machpants
        wrote on last edited by
        #164

        alb with another (almost) intercept

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • KiwiMurphK Offline
          KiwiMurphK Offline
          KiwiMurph
          wrote on last edited by
          #165

          Perofeta got carded vs Crusaders Hunter should be too

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • NTAN Offline
            NTAN Offline
            NTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #166

            Lol here we go.

            Penalty try yellow card

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              Horatio
              wrote on last edited by
              #167

              Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.

              DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                pakman
                wrote on last edited by
                #168

                This yellow card protocol is pants.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • H Horatio

                  Maybe.. doesn't make for a watchable finals series now though, sadly.

                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurphK Offline
                  KiwiMurph
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #169

                  @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                  Maybe.. doesn't make for a watchable finals series now though, sadly.

                  It does if they improve

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Horatio

                    Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.

                    DamoD Offline
                    DamoD Offline
                    Damo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #170

                    @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                    Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.

                    You do go on a bit.

                    If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.

                    H 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • P pakman

                      This yellow card protocol is pants.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mr Fish
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #171

                      @pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                      This yellow card protocol is pants.

                      At least it's very straightforward, which isn't the case for pretty much any of the other laws/protocols.

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • Canes4lifeC Offline
                        Canes4lifeC Offline
                        Canes4life
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #172

                        Chiefs should ring the changes

                        M NTAN 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                          Chiefs should ring the changes

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mr Fish
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #173

                          @Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                          Chiefs should ring the changes

                          Think they've only got one or two left?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • DamoD Damo

                            @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                            Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.

                            You do go on a bit.

                            If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.

                            H Offline
                            H Offline
                            Horatio
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #174

                            @Damo so.. you agree?

                            DamoD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • H Horatio

                              @Damo so.. you agree?

                              DamoD Offline
                              DamoD Offline
                              Damo
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #175

                              @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                              @Damo so.. you agree?

                              I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.

                              H Crazy HorseC 2 Replies Last reply
                              1
                              • DamoD Damo

                                @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                @Damo so.. you agree?

                                I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.

                                H Offline
                                H Offline
                                Horatio
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #176

                                @Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.

                                KiwiMurphK DamoD 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • DamoD Damo

                                  @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                  @Damo so.. you agree?

                                  I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.

                                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                                  Crazy HorseC Offline
                                  Crazy Horse
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #177

                                  @Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                  @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                  @Damo so.. you agree?

                                  I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.

                                  Then what the hell are you doing on the Fern?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  4
                                  • H Horatio

                                    @Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.

                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurph
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #178

                                    @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                    @Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.

                                    Players know the rules. Don't stick your hand out.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • H Horatio

                                      @Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.

                                      DamoD Offline
                                      DamoD Offline
                                      Damo
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #179

                                      @Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                      @Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.

                                      I don't think it's absurd at all. He stuck a hand out when he was in a compromised poor position with an overlap. Clear YC. No dramas.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • M Mr Fish

                                        @pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                        This yellow card protocol is pants.

                                        At least it's very straightforward, which isn't the case for pretty much any of the other laws/protocols.

                                        P Offline
                                        P Offline
                                        pakman
                                        wrote on last edited by pakman
                                        #180

                                        @Mr-Fish said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                        @pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                        This yellow card protocol is pants.

                                        At least it's very straightforward, which isn't the case for pretty much any of the other laws/protocols.

                                        A penalty would have been entirely adequate there. Make it less codified and let experienced refs interpret based on feel for game.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                                          Chiefs should ring the changes

                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTAN Offline
                                          NTA
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #181

                                          @Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:

                                          Chiefs should ring the changes

                                          Just start dropping a player every 5 minutes

                                          Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search