QF - Chiefs v Reds
-
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
You do go on a bit.
If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.
-
-
Chiefs should ring the changes
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Chiefs should ring the changes
Think they've only got one or two left?
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Yellow card for a missed intercept but not for a dangerous tackle with (possible) head contact is peak rugby.
You do go on a bit.
If it wasn't head contact the argument how it had to be a YC is diminished. I agree that it ought to have been a card but it was not as straightforward as you are suggesting.
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo so.. you agree?
I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo so.. you agree?
I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.
-
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo so.. you agree?
I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.
@Damo said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo so.. you agree?
I don't agree with keeping on going on and on about a marginal call an hour ago that could have gone either way.
Then what the hell are you doing on the Fern?
-
@Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.
-
@Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.
@Horatio said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@Damo I was comparing it to the call just made to illustrate the inconsistent nature of the laws of rugby and to highlight how absurd the intercept rule is.
I don't think it's absurd at all. He stuck a hand out when he was in a compromised poor position with an overlap. Clear YC. No dramas.
-
@pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
This yellow card protocol is pants.
At least it's very straightforward, which isn't the case for pretty much any of the other laws/protocols.
@Mr-Fish said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@pakman said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
This yellow card protocol is pants.
At least it's very straightforward, which isn't the case for pretty much any of the other laws/protocols.
A penalty would have been entirely adequate there. Make it less codified and let experienced refs interpret based on feel for game.
-
Chiefs should ring the changes
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Chiefs should ring the changes
Just start dropping a player every 5 minutes
-
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Chiefs should ring the changes
Just start dropping a player every 5 minutes
-
@NTA haha imagine if the Chiefs just took five players off with 5 to go
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@NTA haha imagine if the Chiefs just took five players off with 5 to go
Think you need a minimum of 11 for a game unless yellow cards
-
Who is the backline guru at the Chiefs? I have been really impressed with their angles, passing and drawing this season.
@Crazy-Horse said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
Who is the backline guru at the Chiefs? I have been really impressed with their angles, passing and drawing this season.
Is it Roger the (redacted)
-
@Canes4life said in QF - Chiefs v Reds:
@NTA haha imagine if the Chiefs just took five players off with 5 to go
Think you need a minimum of 11 for a game unless yellow cards
@NTA may aswell go to 11 at this point.
