All Blacks vs Wallabies 2
-
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
Players that should be rested:
Taylor, Lomax, A. Savea, D Mac, J.Barrett, R. Ioane
Why?
Because we should be more worried about England, Ireland and France away than 10th in world Australia who we should beat by 30+ points at home even with the changes.
So your idea is to rest some of the players we're relying on in the vain hope another loss at home will somehow transform new guys into world beaters?
-
@antipodean Australia are ranked 10th in the world. Below Fiji. We can rest 6 or 7 guys and still beat them by 30+ points.
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean Australia are ranked 10th in the world. Below Fiji. We can rest 6 or 7 guys and still beat them by 30+ points.
Guessing you didn't watch our last game.
-
I'm a big fan of Plummer now days and what he did for the Blues but I don't see him as some kind of saviour. I think his style of play really suited Vernball but I'm not convinced he's right for the style of game that Razor likes to play.
-
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean Australia are ranked 10th in the world. Below Fiji. We can rest 6 or 7 guys and still beat them by 30+ points.
Guessing you didn't watch our last game.
-
@antipodean I did.
Let's stop pretending that beating Australia is a big achievement.
The away games against England, Ireland and France are all going to be much more challenging.
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean I did.
Let's stop pretending that beating Australia is a big achievement.
The away games against England, Ireland and France are all going to be much more challenging.
No shit Sherlock. So the win against a donkey opposition by only three points should have you concerned about replacing most of the good players for the next fixture.
-
Winning Wallabies 2 is very important. Small steps.
-
I think Sparky is saying the Bled is won, and a loss at home for Test 2 against Australia is not as important or as valuable as winning on the northern tour.
Not sure that is my preference but I see the reasoning. -
Higgins for me! The guy oozes class
-
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean I did.
Let's stop pretending that beating Australia is a big achievement.
The away games against England, Ireland and France are all going to be much more challenging.
No shit Sherlock. So the win against a donkey opposition by only three points should have you concerned about replacing most of the good players for the next fixture.
@antipodean said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@sparky said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@antipodean I did.
Let's stop pretending that beating Australia is a big achievement.
The away games against England, Ireland and France are all going to be much more challenging.
No shit Sherlock. So the win against a donkey opposition by only three points should have you concerned about replacing most of the good players for the next fixture.
The so called 'good' ie experienced players are the ones stinking up the joint. ALB, DMac, Cane, Ardie, etc. It's some of the noobs who are playing well
-
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
Yeah he said they would look at bringing someone in to be a training body
-
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
Love it, but he's played a handful of games there. It's a massive risk - he looks good, but inexpereince is real. A season at 12 in Super however, and if he handles what gets thrown at him will show he's at least a level below Tests and may step. up.
-
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
Love it, but he's played a handful of games there. It's a massive risk - he looks good, but inexpereince is real. A season at 12 in Super however, and if he handles what gets thrown at him will show he's at least a level below Tests and may step. up.
@nzzp said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
Love it, but he's played a handful of games there. It's a massive risk - he looks good, but inexpereince is real. A season at 12 in Super however, and if he handles what gets thrown at him will show he's at least a level below Tests and may step. up.
I would say coming through the business end of Super Rugby at the position has shown he is up to 12 at the level below.
I think you are over egging the massive risk part. Jordie plays a fairly simple game at 12 currently where he essentially trucks the ball up and realistically - whoever they bring in isn't going to be starting anyway.
He's an experienced player who had played a lot of rugby and anyone can see he looks super comfortable at 12. With his utility value he could be an intriguing bench option (God knows we need help there).
-
@nzzp said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
I think Razor did hint that they might bring cover in.
Lam looked a million bucks at 12 for Blues in the playoffs and had a standout game for Auckland at 12 yesterday.
Love it, but he's played a handful of games there. It's a massive risk - he looks good, but inexpereince is real. A season at 12 in Super however, and if he handles what gets thrown at him will show he's at least a level below Tests and may step. up.
I would say coming through the business end of Super Rugby at the position has shown he is up to 12 at the level below.
I think you are over egging the massive risk part. Jordie plays a fairly simple game at 12 currently where he essentially trucks the ball up and realistically - whoever they bring in isn't going to be starting anyway.
He's an experienced player who had played a lot of rugby and anyone can see he looks super comfortable at 12. With his utility value he could be an intriguing bench option (God knows we need help there).
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
ordie plays a fairly simple game at 12 currently where he essentially trucks the ball up
He's been frustratingly poor at doing this with any physicality. And teh big boot seems to have disappeared. The two big reasons he seemed a sensible option at 12!
-
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
ordie plays a fairly simple game at 12 currently where he essentially trucks the ball up
He's been frustratingly poor at doing this with any physicality. And teh big boot seems to have disappeared. The two big reasons he seemed a sensible option at 12!
@nzzp said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
@KiwiMurph said in All Blacks vs Wallabies 2:
ordie plays a fairly simple game at 12 currently where he essentially trucks the ball up
He's been frustratingly poor at doing this with any physicality. And teh big boot seems to have disappeared. The two big reasons he seemed a sensible option at 12!
I remember as a young fella he appeared to have a good wide passing game too , not sure what happened there
