Aussie Pro Rugby
-
@Tim said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Bloody good on them. Should be aiming for the top, and this is but a start.
@Dan54 said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Tim said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Bloody good on them. Should be aiming for the top, and this is but a start.
I agree. Setting goals is important as it allows you to identify the steps required to achieve them, measure progress and adapt as required.
Given SA have fucked off to seek greener pastures where they can win (URC snigger) we need Australia to get better.; competition improves the breed.
-
@Tim tbh it would be a shame if Fox got the rights back. They were fucking hopeless (Greg Clarke aside) and I much prefer the coverage we get with Stan.
If the federal government has any sense they'll be having a quiet word to 9 about making Stan happen again
-
@Tim tbh it would be a shame if Fox got the rights back. They were fucking hopeless (Greg Clarke aside) and I much prefer the coverage we get with Stan.
If the federal government has any sense they'll be having a quiet word to 9 about making Stan happen again
@NTA said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Tim tbh it would be a shame if Fox got the rights back. They were fucking hopeless (Greg Clarke aside) and I much prefer the coverage we get with Stan.
If the federal government has any sense they'll be having a quiet word to 9 about making Stan happen again
Coverage is way better on Stan and from a couch perspective that’s great, however if RA can secure more funding going to a DANZ route then surely they need to focus on that
-
@NTA said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Tim tbh it would be a shame if Fox got the rights back. They were fucking hopeless (Greg Clarke aside) and I much prefer the coverage we get with Stan.
If the federal government has any sense they'll be having a quiet word to 9 about making Stan happen again
Coverage is way better on Stan and from a couch perspective that’s great, however if RA can secure more funding going to a DANZ route then surely they need to focus on that
@bayimports said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@NTA said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
@Tim tbh it would be a shame if Fox got the rights back. They were fucking hopeless (Greg Clarke aside) and I much prefer the coverage we get with Stan.
If the federal government has any sense they'll be having a quiet word to 9 about making Stan happen again
Coverage is way better on Stan and from a couch perspective that’s great, however if RA can secure more funding going to a DANZ route then surely they need to focus on that
Hopefully it creates competition on the financial front between bidders.
Hopefully the fish heads spend it more wisely than the last windfall, regardless of the source.
Hopefully they they're a heap of it into developing pathways - particularly in western Sydney - and start realigning the pathways.
That's a lot of hope.
And it's the hope that kills you.
-
Isn't DANZ a company that loses a billion dollars a year?
-
Isn't DANZ a company that loses a billion dollars a year?
@antipodean For the last two reported years at least. They're claiming an increase of revenue to GBP3.2B in 2023 (up from GBP1.4B in 2022), but who knows how much more they spent.
https://dazngroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ANNUAL-REVIEW-2023.pdf#page=6.04
-
-
@SBW1 I'd be astonished if he didn't stick with them through to a home RWC.
-
Aust are losing some young players. First Gleeson, now Hooper.
https://www.rugby.com.au/news/tom-hooper-to-depart-act-brumbies-at-the-end-of-2025-2025113
-
These are the sort of fringe guys that we're losing more and more of. Good enough at Super level, probably not quite up to Wallaby quality at the moment.
We just can't pay them what they can get overseas. So I suppose you tip your cap and say good luck. But it's one reason why we can't support five teams and struggle now to support four.
-
These are the sort of fringe guys that we're losing more and more of. Good enough at Super level, probably not quite up to Wallaby quality at the moment.
We just can't pay them what they can get overseas. So I suppose you tip your cap and say good luck. But it's one reason why we can't support five teams and struggle now to support four.
@barbarian said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
But it's one reason why we can't support five teams and struggle now to support four.
And that would be true if we went back to 3 - the product has a certain value, out of which RUPA's slice of the pie is given to players.
Less teams = smaller pie.
-
Aus need to identify the ones they absolutely need to keep, and pay them. Bell, Valetini, i reckon Ikitau as well.
Let Thor go, he's not worth anywhere near what he is on.
-
Aus need to identify the ones they absolutely need to keep, and pay them. Bell, Valetini, i reckon Ikitau as well.
Let Thor go, he's not worth anywhere near what he is on.
@mariner4life said in Aussie Pro Rugby:
Let Thor go, he's not worth anywhere near what he is on.
He has the most expensive calf muscles in world rugby.
-
A short-term injury replacement for Pieter-Steph du Toit at Toyota Verblitz.
-
Bad move
