All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.

[hydro11]

It doesn't matter whether Speight would have scored anyway. It matters whether or not there was an infringement.

[Donsteppa]

More subs needed. Get the decent Savea on.

[hydro11]

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

[Unco]

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Clearly changes his line.

He did but I don't think it changed anything, so it was pretty fuckin harsh.

Still, I'll take it, if only to see that Chieka tantrum.

[Donsteppa]

Fucking Cruden chip kicks.... a reletively new 2016 and unwanted habit...

[Stargazer]

@Donsteppa To replace who? Because it's too early to take Todd off. Read?

[Donsteppa]

@Stargazer said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Donsteppa To replace who? Because it's too early to take Todd off. Read?

Either. Why too early for Todd?

[Sapetyvi]

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

[NTA]

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

[hydro11]

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.

[Donsteppa]

@NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

With correct decisions?

[booboo]

Penalty try for me. Quota disagrees

[Rapido]

After defending marshy in that other thread, ..... You are driving me nuts at the moment along with the other 2.

[Stargazer]

@Donsteppa Because he's still playing great; not looking tired. Read is not playing his best game.

[rotated]

@booboo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Penalty try for me. Quota disagrees

It looked innocuous but his arm closest to the ball was totally impeded. Penalty try would be correct call.

They even out for me.

[Mokey]

After doing all the hard work, Coles butchered that a bit in the end by pausing before diving.

[Sapetyvi]

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.

So you are saying that if that that little push happened in half way behind a ruck, it would have been a penalty?

It was a shit decision by Nige and the TMO in my opinion, you think it wasn't and neither of us is going to change our minds so lets MOVE on.

Edited

[dingo]

I think Nigel just did a even up there. The wallabies should have scored Savea foul try, and another day that would have been a penalty try.

[Donsteppa]

Who are these work experience kids risking a 30 year Eden Park streak tonight?

Tackle FFS.

[Unco]

@NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

Yeah because the ABs never get harsh calls against them.

Cry more.