All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

NTA

alt text

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

hydro11

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.

Donsteppa

@NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

With correct decisions?

booboo

Penalty try for me. Quota disagrees

Rapido

After defending marshy in that other thread, ..... You are driving me nuts at the moment along with the other 2.

Stargazer

@Donsteppa Because he's still playing great; not looking tired. Read is not playing his best game.

rotated

@booboo said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Penalty try for me. Quota disagrees

It looked innocuous but his arm closest to the ball was totally impeded. Penalty try would be correct call.

They even out for me.

Mokey

After doing all the hard work, Coles butchered that a bit in the end by pausing before diving.

Sapetyvi

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.

So you are saying that if that that little push happened in half way behind a ruck, it would have been a penalty?

It was a shit decision by Nige and the TMO in my opinion, you think it wasn't and neither of us is going to change our minds so lets MOVE on.

Edited

dingo

I think Nigel just did a even up there. The wallabies should have scored Savea foul try, and another day that would have been a penalty try.

Donsteppa

Who are these work experience kids risking a 30 year Eden Park streak tonight?

Tackle FFS.

Unco

@NTA said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

So...

Any of you still think the officials don't favour the ABs?

Yeah because the ABs never get harsh calls against them.

Cry more.

hydro11

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@hydro11 said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

@Sapetyvi said in All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.:

Savea was never going to run Speight down. Fucking fuck.

Why is that relevant?

Materiality? That little push changed nothing, but overruling the try might have changed a lot. It might be a 'right call' to the letter of the law but certainly over officitiating

Off the ball stuff is often immaterial but results in penalties.

So you are saying that if that that little push happened in half way behind a ruck, it would have been a penalty?

It was a shit decision by Nige and the TMO in my opinion, you think it wasn't and neither of us is going to change our minds so lets go on.

No. I'm saying that Haylett-Petty deliberately tried to impede Savea. A push on the half way line wouldn't have been taking an action trying to stop a try being scored.

The Silver Fern

All Blacks v Wallabies at Eden Park.