Chiefs vs Hurricanes
-
@Crucial said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Nisbo showing some Alzheimer's signs tonight. Getting himself really confused.
Its not just tonight. Nisbo has been mixing up players for a few years.
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Crucial said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Nisbo showing some Alzheimer's signs tonight. Getting himself really confused.
Its not just tonight. Nisbo has been mixing up players for a few years.
The Highlanders Blues final flashed up on my YouTube yesterday. Nisbo calling Lomu as Vidiri. Comforting stuff.
-
Oh, and....
BEAVER!!!!
-
@Blackeye said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Well at least Nisbo is no where near as annoying as Tony Johnson = should never comment on an Auckland or Blues game again period
Speak for yourself!
-
Poor conditions. Poor refereeing and some very poor rugby by the Canes gives the Chiefs a well-deserved win at home.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Crucial said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Nisbo showing some Alzheimer's signs tonight. Getting himself really confused.
Its not just tonight. Nisbo has been mixing up players for a few years.
The Highlanders Blues final flashed up on my YouTube yesterday. Nisbo calling Lomu as Vidiri. Comforting stuff.
@Bones said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@KiwiMurph said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Crucial said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
Nisbo showing some Alzheimer's signs tonight. Getting himself really confused.
Its not just tonight. Nisbo has been mixing up players for a few years.
The Highlanders Blues final flashed up on my YouTube yesterday. Nisbo calling Lomu as Vidiri. Comforting stuff.
Those were the days aye bro. Super 12 not Super bang bang wank shit whatever it's called nowadays....
-
@canefan
Even Murray Mexted could at least be humours when getting stuff wrong - actually i feel for Nisbo its been his job for (i don't know how many) years, he probably enjoy's the environment and is good to get along with. Possibly has quite a high ranking in agmonst his peers and it may be hard for reality to kick in - although sooner or later it will happen -
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
-
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
-
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
@Kirwan said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
You reckon hitting someone without the ball shouldn't play a part in these decisions? That's just bollocks.
If the judiciary give him some weeks off then so be it, but I didn't think Luatua should have got as many of his weeks either.
-
@Nepia
Yes i did, but TJ is probably the most biased commentator going in nz in the so called professional circuit. Nisbo is really starting to remind me of a really passionate Keith Quinn who in the end was just shocking@Blackeye said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Nepia
Yes i did, but TJ is probably the most biased commentator going in nz in the so called professional circuit. Nisbo is really starting to remind me of a really passionate Keith Quinn who in the end was just shockingAhh, stop your moaning it's not even a Blues game.
And everybody knows the most biased commentator is that salty dickhead Grant Fox.
-
@Kirwan said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
You reckon hitting someone without the ball shouldn't play a part in these decisions? That's just bollocks.
If the judiciary give him some weeks off then so be it, but I didn't think Luatua should have got as many of his weeks either.
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Kirwan said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Nepia said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@Stargazer said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
If Luatua deserved red, then Leitch should have had one, too.
Luatua hit a guy high without the ball, Leitch at least got the ball carrier ....
Which had nothing to do with the card, which was given because of contact to the head with force - with his arm.
Leitch hit the guy in the head with his shoulder, with force. Should have been a red card by the new standard, and if Luatua's ban is the standard 4-6 weeks holiday. Let's see how consistent the Judiciary is.
Yeah right.
You reckon hitting someone without the ball shouldn't play a part in these decisions? That's just bollocks.
If the judiciary give him some weeks off then so be it, but I didn't think Luatua should have got as many of his weeks either.
I never said that, nice strawman. The fact is he got a red card because of the new focus on contact to the head.
The one that was ignored for Leitch.
-
@canefan
Even Murray Mexted could at least be humours when getting stuff wrong - actually i feel for Nisbo its been his job for (i don't know how many) years, he probably enjoy's the environment and is good to get along with. Possibly has quite a high ranking in agmonst his peers and it may be hard for reality to kick in - although sooner or later it will happen@Blackeye said in Chiefs vs Hurricanes:
@canefan
Even Murray Mexted could at least be humours when getting stuff wrong - actually i feel for Nisbo its been his job for (i don't know how many) years, he probably enjoy's the environment and is good to get along with. Possibly has quite a high ranking in agmonst his peers and it may be hard for reality to kick in - although sooner or later it will happenMex and Bill McLaren are commentating Gods. Everyone else sucks compared to them.
