Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Caps v Ireland v Bangledesh ODIs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
67 Posts 17 Posters 10.3k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.C Online
    Chris B.
    wrote on last edited by
    #22

    And, in fact, the only change is Bennett in for Kuggeleijn.

    Rain fade has wiped out my TV for the past half hour, so I might not see any of this.

    Full strength Bangles should be a very good test for "almost NZ A".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Chris B.C Online
      Chris B.C Online
      Chris B.
      wrote on last edited by
      #23

      Rance getting a bit of treatment. Looks to be lacking a yard of pace to me.

      Bennett getting the ball through, though - asking more questions. He looks a bit like a right arm Richard Collinge!

      SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Chris B.C Chris B.

        Rance getting a bit of treatment. Looks to be lacking a yard of pace to me.

        Bennett getting the ball through, though - asking more questions. He looks a bit like a right arm Richard Collinge!

        SiamS Offline
        SiamS Offline
        Siam
        wrote on last edited by
        #24

        @Chris-B.
        Seth confirms the fact that there's a mile of distance between good domestic and international cricketer

        Nice call on Bennett - huge run up too

        Ball ain't swinging at all. Coney commentating - always pleasant I reckon

        Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • SiamS Siam

          @Chris-B.
          Seth confirms the fact that there's a mile of distance between good domestic and international cricketer

          Nice call on Bennett - huge run up too

          Ball ain't swinging at all. Coney commentating - always pleasant I reckon

          Chris B.C Online
          Chris B.C Online
          Chris B.
          wrote on last edited by
          #25

          @Siam Yeah - we could be in a fair bit of trouble in this game. - though as I type, Neesh gets the breakthrough.

          Yeah - there's something about Coney's commentary - very smooth... mellifluous!

          Unlike Owais Shah - with that grating "see if I can sound thicker than I am" Essex sort of accent.

          1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • Chris B.C Online
            Chris B.C Online
            Chris B.
            wrote on last edited by
            #26

            And Santner gets the second one quickly. I can't now see this because rain fade is back.

            Worst ever evening for that! It's pissing down!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • JKJ Offline
              JKJ Offline
              JK
              wrote on last edited by JK
              #27

              Quite good having this series on as it gives me something (albeit not very exciting) to follow while working up this way.

              We've been set 258 to win. Ronchi looking to hit out again (which is good) and a 4 and 6 off first two balls he faced

              Rain forecast soon so not sure they will get 20 overs in

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JKJ Offline
                JKJ Offline
                JK
                wrote on last edited by
                #28

                Ronchi out 27 off 27

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Chris B.C Online
                  Chris B.C Online
                  Chris B.
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  A narrow points victory to Tom Latham over Ronchi in this game. Tom scored more runs, but Luke got his faster and gave the innings some initial impetus (and Luke is wearing the gloves, while Tom is not - though he is captain).

                  Otherwise, Broom and Neesham both doing good jobs with the bat and Bennett, Santner and Sodhi doing good jobs with the ball - Rance and Neesham both very expensive.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mimicM Offline
                    mimicM Offline
                    mimic
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    Latham with a ton, thanks to the Irish bowler overstepping when Latham was caught on 90ish..

                    Seems to have won the battle against Ronchi.. hopefully Latham keeps in the odis..

                    Anderson is struggling out in the middle.. seems like he's trying too hard

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Chris B.C Online
                      Chris B.C Online
                      Chris B.
                      wrote on last edited by Chris B.
                      #31

                      Yeah - that's a convincing win for Tom.

                      Ronchi has done quite well in the BMac role of coming out and giving the innings impetus, but notably he hasn't managed to go on with any of his innings and we're playing Ireland and the Bangles not England and Australia.

                      Anderson looked terribly out of form - I'm not convinced he's a guy who can come out and hit from ball one in any case. He seems to need a few overs to have a look and scratch about. Rossco looked a bit scratchy as well.

                      Munro showed Corey how it's done in this innings.

                      I guess there's a couple more ODIs to play before the CT but I'd lean towards:

                      Guptill, Latham, Williamson, Taylor, Broom, Neesham, Santner, Milne, Southee, McClenaghan, Boult

                      Slightly light in batting - I blame Southee who could have developed into a decent and reliable 8, but hasn't.

                      I don't think this line-up will be quite good enough to win the Trophy -but, they might be able to burgle it. Will need some luck and most likely Kane and Guppy to play multiple big innings at the right time.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • Chris B.C Online
                        Chris B.C Online
                        Chris B.
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        Final game of this series.

                        Bennett, Neesham and Jeetan come in for Kuggelijn, Milne and Sodhi (I think?).

                        NZ will bat, so a chance to see whether Ronchi can put more pressure on Latham and whether Anderson can show some form.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Chris B.C Online
                          Chris B.C Online
                          Chris B.
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #33

                          And Tom Latham sees out an eventful first over that started with a wide, a wide that wasn't called, a reasonable lbw shout, an easy dropped catch, and a boundary...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Chris B.C Online
                            Chris B.C Online
                            Chris B.
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #34

                            Tom gets most of the early strike and gets away quickly to 20*.

                            Ronchi finally gets strike and is out for 2 - caught off a mistimed shot again.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • gollumG Offline
                              gollumG Offline
                              gollum
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #35

                              Lathams run of scores on this tour -

                              52, 15, 54, 104, 52* (so far today)

                              I'd argue in a team with Guppy, Anderson, Taylor & Neesham who all capable of smashing it he looks the right bet at the top. Also he's not 40.

                              Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • gollumG gollum

                                Lathams run of scores on this tour -

                                52, 15, 54, 104, 52* (so far today)

                                I'd argue in a team with Guppy, Anderson, Taylor & Neesham who all capable of smashing it he looks the right bet at the top. Also he's not 40.

                                Chris B.C Online
                                Chris B.C Online
                                Chris B.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #36

                                @gollum Yeah - I think the key thing for Tom will be not to bat himself into any sort of hole. No matter how good the bowling he needs to play some shots.

                                Might be a temptation - with the team I named above - to replace one of the seamers with Anderson and require him and Neesham to bowl 10 overs between them (maybe Kane to bowl a few as well).

                                If Corey can find some form, that would strengthen the batting quite a lot - Neesham at 7 and Santner at 8.

                                gollumG 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                  @gollum Yeah - I think the key thing for Tom will be not to bat himself into any sort of hole. No matter how good the bowling he needs to play some shots.

                                  Might be a temptation - with the team I named above - to replace one of the seamers with Anderson and require him and Neesham to bowl 10 overs between them (maybe Kane to bowl a few as well).

                                  If Corey can find some form, that would strengthen the batting quite a lot - Neesham at 7 and Santner at 8.

                                  gollumG Offline
                                  gollumG Offline
                                  gollum
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @Chris-B.

                                  Yip, totally agree, he just needs that mindset that if we are 70 / 0 & he's not timing hit have a slog, best case he hits a few, worst case he steps aside for Kane. Otherwise his role is to just go at 85% strike rate, not get out & take singles to get the other guy on strike.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • Chris B.C Online
                                    Chris B.C Online
                                    Chris B.
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #38

                                    Tom gets bowled for 84, in a pretty dribbly fashion - rebounds off the back pad onto the front leg and back onto the stumps.

                                    In terms of the game situation, this is ideal for Anderson - coming in at 167/3 after 30 overs. He can take a little bit of time to get in and then hopefully find some form and confidence and smack it around.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gollumG Offline
                                      gollumG Offline
                                      gollum
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #39

                                      As expected Jeets is carrying us home here...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • JKJ Offline
                                        JKJ Offline
                                        JK
                                        wrote on last edited by JK
                                        #40

                                        @gollum said in Black Caps v Ireland v Bangledesh ODIs:

                                        As expected Jeets is carrying us home here...

                                        Nope....

                                        We just lost to Bangladesh

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Chris B.C Online
                                          Chris B.C Online
                                          Chris B.
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #41

                                          I left this when Anderson went out and we were cruising at 210/4 just short of 40 overs.

                                          Neesham, Santner and Munro somehow seem to have conspired to reduce us to 228/7 and we've ended up 30-40 runs short of where we should have.

                                          Looks like none of our bowlers covered themselves in glory - the Anderson-Neesham combo were particularly ineffectual and probably bring CdGh into contention by dint of not playing.

                                          Piss poor final 60 overs!

                                          Anderson did at least look a lot more fluent in making his 24. Good efforts by Latham, Rossco and Broom.

                                          SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          2
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search