Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Eden Park

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
334 Posts 48 Posters 24.0k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • AuckmanA Auckman

    @JK - fair enough. When I lived in the Shore years ago, the buses were terrible. I’m told they still are recently with all the public transport disruptions this year.

    JKJ Offline
    JKJ Offline
    JK
    wrote on last edited by
    #324

    @Auckman said in Eden Park:

    @JK - fair enough. When I lived in the Shore years ago, the buses were terrible. I’m told they still are recently with all the public transport disruptions this year.

    Yes I think they still are. I don't catch them for daily commutes but the ferries are very unreliable.

    For a game though its quite different with buses direct to Eden Park from most bus stations as well as other handy locations like Takapuna central. Its very easy and no charge as all included within your ticket (not that they even check).

    nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • AuckmanA Auckman

      @ARHS - most of downtown Auckland is reclaimed from the sea. Not sure what the problem is. According to you Britomart station (ie: that underground station right next to the harbour) should’ve been flooded by now. Well, it hasn’t flooded. Not even with the recent floods.

      ARHSA Offline
      ARHSA Offline
      ARHS
      wrote on last edited by
      #325

      @Auckman said in Eden Park:

      @ARHS - most of downtown Auckland is reclaimed from the sea. Not sure what the problem is. According to you Britomart station (ie: that underground station right next to the harbour) should’ve been flooded by now. Well, it hasn’t flooded. Not even with the recent floods.

      Read what I wrote. You promoted the steps down to the harbour water. Maybe I read it wrong in thinking it was being built immediately adjacent to the water. But I understood it was to be a floating roof for the promoted design.

      Because of the roof thing i asked about the plan for watering the turf at that level and whether the roof would block all rain.
      There will be lots of water pumped out for people and services.
      If you published the engineering plan that might help the cause.

      AuckmanA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • JKJ JK

        @Auckman said in Eden Park:

        @JK - fair enough. When I lived in the Shore years ago, the buses were terrible. I’m told they still are recently with all the public transport disruptions this year.

        Yes I think they still are. I don't catch them for daily commutes but the ferries are very unreliable.

        For a game though its quite different with buses direct to Eden Park from most bus stations as well as other handy locations like Takapuna central. Its very easy and no charge as all included within your ticket (not that they even check).

        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamusN Offline
        nostrildamus
        wrote on last edited by nostrildamus
        #326

        I shouldn't get involved in a thread where people have such strong opinions but I would like to note just recently Auckland City Council had an over 200 million $ bill for leaky buildings, it is a problematic and expensive thing to fix a portside stadium if things go wrong and even modern architecture gets it wrong, spectacularly.

        And the most famous harbourside architectural landmark of the 20th century went massively over budget and they sacked the architect.

        If it was my money I'd be very sceptical of a stadium set into the water, especially in terms of costs, construction quality, and getting it built on time. Surely there is an easier way and a location that is more accessible than an overcrowded pimple on the edge of an isthmus.

        KirwanK AuckmanA 2 Replies Last reply
        2
        • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

          I shouldn't get involved in a thread where people have such strong opinions but I would like to note just recently Auckland City Council had an over 200 million $ bill for leaky buildings, it is a problematic and expensive thing to fix a portside stadium if things go wrong and even modern architecture gets it wrong, spectacularly.

          And the most famous harbourside architectural landmark of the 20th century went massively over budget and they sacked the architect.

          If it was my money I'd be very sceptical of a stadium set into the water, especially in terms of costs, construction quality, and getting it built on time. Surely there is an easier way and a location that is more accessible than an overcrowded pimple on the edge of an isthmus.

          KirwanK Offline
          KirwanK Offline
          Kirwan
          wrote on last edited by
          #327

          @nostrildamus said in Eden Park:

          I shouldn't get involved in a thread where people have such strong opinions but I would like to note just recently Auckland City Council had an over 200 million $ bill for leaky buildings, it is a problematic and expensive thing to fix a portside stadium if things go wrong and even modern architecture gets it wrong, spectacularly.

          And the most famous harbourside architectural landmark of the 20th century went massively over budget and they sacked the architect.

          If it was my money I'd be very sceptical of a stadium set into the water, especially in terms of costs, construction quality, and getting it built on time. Surely there is an easier way and a location that is more accessible than an overcrowded pimple on the edge of an isthmus.

          Yeah it's called Eden Park, just keep iterating on improving access. As a bonus, you don't throw away a century of history.

          nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • KirwanK Kirwan

            @nostrildamus said in Eden Park:

            I shouldn't get involved in a thread where people have such strong opinions but I would like to note just recently Auckland City Council had an over 200 million $ bill for leaky buildings, it is a problematic and expensive thing to fix a portside stadium if things go wrong and even modern architecture gets it wrong, spectacularly.

            And the most famous harbourside architectural landmark of the 20th century went massively over budget and they sacked the architect.

            If it was my money I'd be very sceptical of a stadium set into the water, especially in terms of costs, construction quality, and getting it built on time. Surely there is an easier way and a location that is more accessible than an overcrowded pimple on the edge of an isthmus.

            Yeah it's called Eden Park, just keep iterating on improving access. As a bonus, you don't throw away a century of history.

            nostrildamusN Offline
            nostrildamusN Offline
            nostrildamus
            wrote on last edited by
            #328

            @Kirwan said in Eden Park:

            Yeah it's called Eden Park, just keep iterating on improving access. As a bonus, you don't throw away a century of history.

            yeah I think my family have been supporters there for getting up to close to a century and you forgot arguably the biggest advantage: the AB Eden Park record!
            https://www.allblacks.com/news/eden-park-winning-streak-on-the-line-2/

            But in my opinion, there has to be a line beyond which it wouldn't be feasible to upgrade Eden Park-I don't know what that line is and if it would be reached but I think there should be one.

            Oh and I've walked top of Queen St (where I used to live) to Eden Park and it was a great little walk.

            To the poster who said North Shore was too far with public transport, that has definitely improved in the last few years but yeah it still depends on exactly where one lives on the Shore.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

              I shouldn't get involved in a thread where people have such strong opinions but I would like to note just recently Auckland City Council had an over 200 million $ bill for leaky buildings, it is a problematic and expensive thing to fix a portside stadium if things go wrong and even modern architecture gets it wrong, spectacularly.

              And the most famous harbourside architectural landmark of the 20th century went massively over budget and they sacked the architect.

              If it was my money I'd be very sceptical of a stadium set into the water, especially in terms of costs, construction quality, and getting it built on time. Surely there is an easier way and a location that is more accessible than an overcrowded pimple on the edge of an isthmus.

              AuckmanA Offline
              AuckmanA Offline
              Auckman
              wrote on last edited by
              #329

              @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

              KirwanK nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
              1
              • ARHSA ARHS

                @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                @ARHS - most of downtown Auckland is reclaimed from the sea. Not sure what the problem is. According to you Britomart station (ie: that underground station right next to the harbour) should’ve been flooded by now. Well, it hasn’t flooded. Not even with the recent floods.

                Read what I wrote. You promoted the steps down to the harbour water. Maybe I read it wrong in thinking it was being built immediately adjacent to the water. But I understood it was to be a floating roof for the promoted design.

                Because of the roof thing i asked about the plan for watering the turf at that level and whether the roof would block all rain.
                There will be lots of water pumped out for people and services.
                If you published the engineering plan that might help the cause.

                AuckmanA Offline
                AuckmanA Offline
                Auckman
                wrote on last edited by
                #330

                @ARHS refer to my reply to Nostrilimius. Cheers

                ARHSA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • AuckmanA Auckman

                  @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                  KirwanK Offline
                  KirwanK Offline
                  Kirwan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #331

                  @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                  @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                  Everything’s solvable with enough money.

                  boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • AuckmanA Auckman

                    @ARHS refer to my reply to Nostrilimius. Cheers

                    ARHSA Offline
                    ARHSA Offline
                    ARHS
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #332

                    @Auckman all good. I was challenging around the terms: waterfront, beside Bledisloe Wharf, floating roof and sunken from the promo articles. Quay Park seems to be a more practical option.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • AuckmanA Auckman

                      @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamusN Offline
                      nostrildamus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #333

                      @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                      @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                      Yeah um it takes money to keep reclaimed land as land. Especially with the projections for sea rise.

                      He's an architect not an engineer but:
                      https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2018/11/13/auckland-stadium-not-waterfront.html

                      and if you can zoom in via this:
                      https://interactives.stuff.co.nz/2022/04/sinking-cities-sea-level-rise/

                      as to the costs (and some section details) consider (and extrapolate from) this:
                      https://www.tonkintaylor.co.nz/news/2021/4/sea-change-safeguarding-tāmaki-makaurau/

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • KirwanK Kirwan

                        @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                        @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                        Everything’s solvable with enough money.

                        boobooB Offline
                        boobooB Offline
                        booboo
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #334

                        @Kirwan said in Eden Park:

                        @Auckman said in Eden Park:

                        @nostrildamus - well I’m a supporter of the Quay park site. Surely though, the “sunken stadium” isn’t actually sitting in water? It’s going to be reclaimed land like everywhere else in downtown Auckland. Engineers have repeatedly said it on here that it’s not a problem.

                        Everything’s solvable with enough money.

                        As an old colleague of mine used to say "There's no such thing as an engineering problem, it's a money problem."

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Search
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Search