New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday
-
@paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?
That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.
Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.
Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??
-
-
-
@hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@dogmeat said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@hooroo accelerate the run rate to contrive a declaration?
I like that but how in 20/20?
Basically it was spite I think - although he denies that it was deliberate. Could sort of understand if there was cash for fastest hundred or something.
-
@hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?
That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.
Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.
Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??
Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"
-
@chris-b said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?
That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.
Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.
Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??
Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"
Paddy batch in that world cup, so the story goes
-
-
@barbarian you only do it once!!
-
@siam said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@chris-b said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@hooroo said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
@paekakboyz said in New Cricket Laws Coming Thursday:
Really like those - but wonder if any ump will have the stones to send someone off. Do we know of any recent instances that would have led to a send off?
That deliberate front foot no ball (in the Windies 20/20 comp?) would be a good example of no more bowling in that innings.
Good to see the bat sizes reigned in also - that was starting to get a bit out of hand.
Can you help me out with this? I don't understand why they would intentially bowl a front foot no ball??
Can't recall who Curtly Ambrose (I think) was bowling to, but the batsman charged him and got a warning - "If you don't stay behind your line, I won't stay behind mine!"
Paddy batch in that world cup, so the story goes
The man who put Malcolm Marshall over Extra Cover for 6... Doubt he would have had any fear at all!
