Awesome stuff you see on the internet
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="MajorRage" data-cid="566480" data-time="1458615359">
<div>
<p>I weight discriminate. And I will continue to do so.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If you are interviewing and you have 2 identical candidates but one is obese and one isn't, why would you choose the obese?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>In fact, I would probably go so far to take a lesser candidate who was fit and healthy over a better candidate who was obese.</strong></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The problem being that 'skinnier' people can be as unhealthy and unfit as a fatty - unless of course you just hire gym bunnies, but they'll likely be on the juice anyway ;).</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="566564" data-time="1458640457">
<div>
<p>As is Kelly McGillis.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Someone, somewhere back in the 80s was not pulling his weight.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Or over pulling his weight, given she was raped.</p> -
<p>Not wishing to appear to trivialise such a thing but she had been treading the left hand path for sometime before that incident.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Edit: My bad. I read her and her girlfriend before realising it was before she came out. And before she got married. However she was by all accounts struggling with her sexuality long beforehand.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="Catogrande" data-cid="566587" data-time="1458658619">
<div>
<p>Not wishing to appear to trivialise such a thing but she had been treading the left hand path for sometime before that incident.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Edit: My bad. I read her and her girlfriend before realising it was before she came out. And before she got married. However she was by all accounts struggling with her sexuality long beforehand.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>She said at some stage that she was gay, got married, got divorced (because gay) got raped, viewed that maybe the rape was gods judgement on her for being gay. Then got married again. Thats some messed up shit. Good ole religious guilt...</p> -
Not to do a Gollum but I suspect the jiggler (Mel, Kim?) died a few years back of cancer.<br><br>
These days off course every rap video has chicks in bikinis, u see the fat ass of hoes like Nicki Minaj and titless and talentless Hannah oops sorry Miley Cyrus all the time.<br>
But in the 80's jiggling like that was enough to set impressionable 15 year olds like me 'off' -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="saulityvi" data-cid="566568" data-time="1458641809">
<div>
<p><br>
And to stay ontopic, I give you the former sports and Culture minister of Finland Tanja Karpela(Saarela)<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg">https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Very, very interesting. Top post. :drinks:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sorry, you were saying something about benefits or something?</p> -
<p>some of them are good tracks, </p>
'>[media]</a><br>
<p> </p>
<p>One more to add</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href='
</p>
<p></p>
<p><a data-ipb='nomediaparse' href=''>[/media]</a></p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="jegga" data-cid="566623" data-time="1458675810">
<div>
<p>I notice none of these songs are appearing in the " what are you listening too right now?"thread, I'm guessing you're all watching them with the volume down too?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Do we need to start a "What are you whipping the head off it to?" Thread?</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="saulityvi" data-cid="566568" data-time="1458641809">
<div>
<p>The finnish social services are a mess and very expensive for the taxpayer as there are two instances, the aforementioned Kela and a Social welfare office and about a hundred different support payments. Anyone with half a brain understands that there is too much bureacracy and too many bureacrates running this shit.<br><br>
That is exactly why the majority are leaning towards basic income and also becouse at present, if you are on social support/welfare and get a short term job, say 1-2 month with "possible" extension, you loose the welfare for 1-3 months afterwards, so long term unemployed people cant afford to take short term jobs and I can assure you, it is a MASSIVE shame in Finland to be unemployed, so the majority of unemployed people would take those part time chances of it wouldnt wreck their personal economies for months.<br><br>
And to stay ontopic, I give you the former sports and Culture minister of Finland Tanja Karpela(Saarela)<br><br><a class="bbc_url" href="https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg">https://media.riemurasia.net/albumit/m10001/483241510.jpg</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Someone at work here did the back-of-napkin calculations: social welfare versus a basic living wage in Australia worked out to be within $2B of each other.</p> -
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
-
<p>am i too late to this party?</p>
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>[media]
<p> </p>
<p>I actually really like this song</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="566650" data-time="1458685274">
<div>
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And there is ZERO chance that they would get rid of welfare, they would still need top ups.</p>
<p>The plans is retarded and just another deluded fantasy of the regressive left.</p> -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="taniwharugby" data-cid="566650" data-time="1458685274">
<div>
<p>I thought I saw something the other day saying it would be another 1/3 on top of the existing budget in NZ?</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Might be a remark about welfare levels in NZ in general, cost of living etc. Unemployment rate is only 5.8% compared to our 6.2% for example. Smaller population.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I wasn't sure if the back-of-napkin would include the cost of the public service support to it, or whether it was just payments.</p>
