Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

6N 2018

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
532 Posts 49 Posters 27.6k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mooshld
    wrote on last edited by
    #325

    I have never seen worse game management by an international team then I saw in that France England game.

    With 3 minutes to go and a lead of 3 points France win a penalty deep in the English half.

    Why would you ever decide to kick that? England were never playing for the draw. So even if you kick it they still need a try to win. Insurance against the conversion thats pretty shit insurance at this level. They needed to bang that into the corner and burn up the 3 minutes going for the try.

    Then once time is up. Beauxis putting a beautiful spiral on the ball and not finding touch is unthinkable he was only 10 meters from the side line he could have put it on the second deck from there.

    France deserved to lose for being so dumb. They would have learnt a lot more if they had lost.

    A 1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • jeggaJ jegga

      @mn5 said in 6N 2018:

      @stargazer said in 6N 2018:

      @taniwharugby said in 6N 2018:

      an unwanted record...and a shitty headline.

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12010929

      I actually find it a disgusting article and headline. He's an international, a good player in a team that may be the weakest in the 6 Nations and no. 14 in the world rankings, but reaching 133 test caps is a huge achievement nevertheless. He deserves respect, not rubbish like this.

      Come on Scotland! Get him to the milestone in style !

      Italy are lucky that Scotland have been pretty dire particularly in the mid 2000s when it was always an entertaining scrap for bottom place. In saying that they've still picked up 13 wooden spoons in 18 years.

      They've brought precisely 3 5ths of 5 8ths of fuck all to the tournament as a whole.

      Money . They bought money to tournament. That it though, they’ve bought fuck all else.

      The Ferald having a cheap shot? There’s a surprise.

      MN5M Online
      MN5M Online
      MN5
      wrote on last edited by
      #326

      @jegga said in 6N 2018:

      @mn5 said in 6N 2018:

      @stargazer said in 6N 2018:

      @taniwharugby said in 6N 2018:

      an unwanted record...and a shitty headline.

      http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12010929

      I actually find it a disgusting article and headline. He's an international, a good player in a team that may be the weakest in the 6 Nations and no. 14 in the world rankings, but reaching 133 test caps is a huge achievement nevertheless. He deserves respect, not rubbish like this.

      Come on Scotland! Get him to the milestone in style !

      Italy are lucky that Scotland have been pretty dire particularly in the mid 2000s when it was always an entertaining scrap for bottom place. In saying that they've still picked up 13 wooden spoons in 18 years.

      They've brought precisely 3 5ths of 5 8ths of fuck all to the tournament as a whole.

      Money . They bought money to tournament. That it though, they’ve bought fuck all else.

      The Ferald having a cheap shot? There’s a surprise.

      I wonder if Georgia or Romania could have managed their level of consistent shitness?

      MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M mooshld

        @sapetyvi said in 6N 2018:

        @bovidae I once saw an introduction clip about the HIA's and the doctor had a laptop there and said the first check is an eye-test, he watches a replay from the incident and if he doesn't like the look of it, the player fails and also said he watches the game if he sees something worth checking he can inform the refereeing team to get a player for the test.

        Aren't Ireland claiming it was not a head injury but a stinger? The video some what disputes this.

        SapetyviS Offline
        SapetyviS Offline
        Sapetyvi
        wrote on last edited by
        #327

        @mooshld Haven't read anything from it bar from here, but after that video we all know it was a concussion.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M mooshld

          I have never seen worse game management by an international team then I saw in that France England game.

          With 3 minutes to go and a lead of 3 points France win a penalty deep in the English half.

          Why would you ever decide to kick that? England were never playing for the draw. So even if you kick it they still need a try to win. Insurance against the conversion thats pretty shit insurance at this level. They needed to bang that into the corner and burn up the 3 minutes going for the try.

          Then once time is up. Beauxis putting a beautiful spiral on the ball and not finding touch is unthinkable he was only 10 meters from the side line he could have put it on the second deck from there.

          France deserved to lose for being so dumb. They would have learnt a lot more if they had lost.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          akan004
          wrote on last edited by akan004
          #328

          @mooshld Couldn't agree more. Taking the 3 with 3 minutes to go was as dumb a decision as I have seen. Was surprised that none of the commentators mentioned anything. All that the penalty achieved was to hand back field position to England.

          CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • CrucialC Offline
            CrucialC Offline
            Crucial
            wrote on last edited by
            #329

            Reading more comments from Eddie and the English players I am glad to see they are still fixated on size and power over speed.
            It was plain to see that their forwards were too slow to support the ball carrier but apparently the problem is not having enough power.
            Jake the Muss would be happy to explain.

            1 Reply Last reply
            3
            • A akan004

              @mooshld Couldn't agree more. Taking the 3 with 3 minutes to go was as dumb a decision as I have seen. Was surprised that none of the commentators mentioned anything. All that the penalty achieved was to hand back field position to England.

              CatograndeC Online
              CatograndeC Online
              Catogrande
              wrote on last edited by
              #330

              @akan004 said in 6N 2018:

              @mooshld Couldn't agree more. Taking the 3 with 3 minutes to go was as dumb a decision as I have seen. Was surprised that none of the commentators mentioned anything. All that the penalty achieved was to hand back field position to England.

              The Argies did a similar thing during the Summer tests and the comms guys were spluttering about it, so yeah strange they had nothing to say. Maybe they realised England were never going to string enough phases together.

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • MN5M MN5

                @jegga said in 6N 2018:

                @mn5 said in 6N 2018:

                @stargazer said in 6N 2018:

                @taniwharugby said in 6N 2018:

                an unwanted record...and a shitty headline.

                http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12010929

                I actually find it a disgusting article and headline. He's an international, a good player in a team that may be the weakest in the 6 Nations and no. 14 in the world rankings, but reaching 133 test caps is a huge achievement nevertheless. He deserves respect, not rubbish like this.

                Come on Scotland! Get him to the milestone in style !

                Italy are lucky that Scotland have been pretty dire particularly in the mid 2000s when it was always an entertaining scrap for bottom place. In saying that they've still picked up 13 wooden spoons in 18 years.

                They've brought precisely 3 5ths of 5 8ths of fuck all to the tournament as a whole.

                Money . They bought money to tournament. That it though, they’ve bought fuck all else.

                The Ferald having a cheap shot? There’s a surprise.

                I wonder if Georgia or Romania could have managed their level of consistent shitness?

                MiketheSnowM Offline
                MiketheSnowM Offline
                MiketheSnow
                wrote on last edited by
                #331

                @mn5 said in 6N 2018:

                @jegga said in 6N 2018:

                @mn5 said in 6N 2018:

                @stargazer said in 6N 2018:

                @taniwharugby said in 6N 2018:

                an unwanted record...and a shitty headline.

                http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=12010929

                I actually find it a disgusting article and headline. He's an international, a good player in a team that may be the weakest in the 6 Nations and no. 14 in the world rankings, but reaching 133 test caps is a huge achievement nevertheless. He deserves respect, not rubbish like this.

                Come on Scotland! Get him to the milestone in style !

                Italy are lucky that Scotland have been pretty dire particularly in the mid 2000s when it was always an entertaining scrap for bottom place. In saying that they've still picked up 13 wooden spoons in 18 years.

                They've brought precisely 3 5ths of 5 8ths of fuck all to the tournament as a whole.

                Money . They bought money to tournament. That it though, they’ve bought fuck all else.

                The Ferald having a cheap shot? There’s a surprise.

                I wonder if Georgia or Romania could have managed their level of consistent shitness?

                Romania definitely

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugbyT Offline
                  taniwharugby
                  wrote on last edited by taniwharugby
                  #332

                  So Healey only got a 'stinger' to the shoulder/traps

                  No Head injury

                  https://www.breakingnews.ie/sport/rugby/irfu-defends-appropriate-treatment-given-to-cian-healy-832109.html

                  Eddie missed a trick on this

                  https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/102212198/mentally-draining-lions-tour-of-nz-is-badly-affecting-england--jeremy-guscott

                  Billy TellB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

                    So Healey only got a 'stinger' to the shoulder/traps

                    No Head injury

                    https://www.breakingnews.ie/sport/rugby/irfu-defends-appropriate-treatment-given-to-cian-healy-832109.html

                    Eddie missed a trick on this

                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/102212198/mentally-draining-lions-tour-of-nz-is-badly-affecting-england--jeremy-guscott

                    Billy TellB Offline
                    Billy TellB Offline
                    Billy Tell
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #333

                    @taniwharugby said in 6N 2018:

                    So Healey only got a 'stinger' to the shoulder/traps

                    No Head injury

                    https://www.breakingnews.ie/sport/rugby/irfu-defends-appropriate-treatment-given-to-cian-healy-832109.html

                    Eddie missed a trick on this

                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/rugby/international/102212198/mentally-draining-lions-tour-of-nz-is-badly-affecting-england--jeremy-guscott

                    What a crock of shit. It's not mentally affecting Ireland. Imagine if NZ started wheeling out these excuses.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    5
                    • CatograndeC Online
                      CatograndeC Online
                      Catogrande
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #334

                      @Billy-Tell @taniwharugby To be fair to Guscott and to re-confirm Stuff's status as a journalistic cesspool, his article was much longer than that and his reasons (which he accompanied with a rationale), were, in order:-

                      1. England are over thinking it at the moment.
                      2. People assume the team lack leaders.
                      3. England's best players are playing well below their best.
                      4. England have only 3-4 world class players
                      5. Eddie is the main leader and he's not preparing the team well enough at present.
                      6. England are plodding in attack.
                      7. A Lions tour is so mentally draining.
                      8. There's no clarity at the breakdown.
                      9. George Ford has been almost anonymous.

                      So, a bit more to it than Stuff would have you believe.

                      MajorPomM 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • CatograndeC Catogrande

                        @Billy-Tell @taniwharugby To be fair to Guscott and to re-confirm Stuff's status as a journalistic cesspool, his article was much longer than that and his reasons (which he accompanied with a rationale), were, in order:-

                        1. England are over thinking it at the moment.
                        2. People assume the team lack leaders.
                        3. England's best players are playing well below their best.
                        4. England have only 3-4 world class players
                        5. Eddie is the main leader and he's not preparing the team well enough at present.
                        6. England are plodding in attack.
                        7. A Lions tour is so mentally draining.
                        8. There's no clarity at the breakdown.
                        9. George Ford has been almost anonymous.

                        So, a bit more to it than Stuff would have you believe.

                        MajorPomM Offline
                        MajorPomM Offline
                        MajorPom
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #335

                        @catogrande Yeah, you are right Cato, that stuff article is not exactly telling the whole picture. I read Guscotts column today as he's pretty good and usually on the money.

                        The biggest thing that shocked me though, was he didn't list Itoje in his world class players. That's certainly going against the grain of England rugby journalism, who almost seem to have some sort of illness which prevents them saying anything negative, or even neutral about him.

                        FWIW I think he's been relatively anonymous in this years 6N.

                        CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • MajorPomM MajorPom

                          @catogrande Yeah, you are right Cato, that stuff article is not exactly telling the whole picture. I read Guscotts column today as he's pretty good and usually on the money.

                          The biggest thing that shocked me though, was he didn't list Itoje in his world class players. That's certainly going against the grain of England rugby journalism, who almost seem to have some sort of illness which prevents them saying anything negative, or even neutral about him.

                          FWIW I think he's been relatively anonymous in this years 6N.

                          CatograndeC Online
                          CatograndeC Online
                          Catogrande
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #336

                          @majorrage said in 6N 2018:

                          @catogrande Yeah, you are right Cato, that stuff article is not exactly telling the whole picture. I read Guscotts column today as he's pretty good and usually on the money.

                          The biggest thing that shocked me though, was he didn't list Itoje in his world class players. That's certainly going against the grain of England rugby journalism, who almost seem to have some sort of illness which prevents them saying anything negative, or even neutral about him.

                          FWIW I think he's been relatively anonymous in this years 6N.

                          Yeah English rugby journalism have a love affair with Itoje and I sometimes wonder if he asks himself "is it because I'm a poster boy for the black community"? For sure he's a very good player and also he had that long winning streak last season but the wankfest over him has been excessive. He's a pretty intelligent guy so I'd hope it doesn't go to his head - it certainly doesn't seem as though it has affected him going by the odd interview I've seen.

                          His form since the Lions has not been up there and I'd guess that is for a mixture of reasons. Tiredness, staleness, playing in sides that are not as dominant as they were, mixed messages in game management and likely more. I do think that he's got real potential though, both as a player and as a leader and I really hope he fulfils both.

                          He has been a fair bit quieter in this years 6N (and far from the only culprit here) but oddly made some impressive line out steals v France. Maybe he's getting his mojo back?

                          MajorPomM taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • BovidaeB Offline
                            BovidaeB Offline
                            Bovidae
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #337

                            Who are the world class players in Guscott's view? I assume Farrell is one but I'm curious about who he thinks the others are.

                            CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • BovidaeB Bovidae

                              Who are the world class players in Guscott's view? I assume Farrell is one but I'm curious about who he thinks the others are.

                              CatograndeC Online
                              CatograndeC Online
                              Catogrande
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #338

                              @bovidae said in 6N 2018:

                              Who are the world class players in Guscott's view? I assume Farrell is one but I'm curious about who he thinks the others are.

                              Farrell, Daly, Billy Vunipola with mentions of Mako Vunipola and Anthony Watson.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnowM Offline
                                MiketheSnow
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #339

                                Time for Eddie to admit that his selections have been off / players not playing to their ability.

                                Farrell to 10
                                Daly and Joseph in midfield

                                CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • CatograndeC Catogrande

                                  @majorrage said in 6N 2018:

                                  @catogrande Yeah, you are right Cato, that stuff article is not exactly telling the whole picture. I read Guscotts column today as he's pretty good and usually on the money.

                                  The biggest thing that shocked me though, was he didn't list Itoje in his world class players. That's certainly going against the grain of England rugby journalism, who almost seem to have some sort of illness which prevents them saying anything negative, or even neutral about him.

                                  FWIW I think he's been relatively anonymous in this years 6N.

                                  Yeah English rugby journalism have a love affair with Itoje and I sometimes wonder if he asks himself "is it because I'm a poster boy for the black community"? For sure he's a very good player and also he had that long winning streak last season but the wankfest over him has been excessive. He's a pretty intelligent guy so I'd hope it doesn't go to his head - it certainly doesn't seem as though it has affected him going by the odd interview I've seen.

                                  His form since the Lions has not been up there and I'd guess that is for a mixture of reasons. Tiredness, staleness, playing in sides that are not as dominant as they were, mixed messages in game management and likely more. I do think that he's got real potential though, both as a player and as a leader and I really hope he fulfils both.

                                  He has been a fair bit quieter in this years 6N (and far from the only culprit here) but oddly made some impressive line out steals v France. Maybe he's getting his mojo back?

                                  MajorPomM Offline
                                  MajorPomM Offline
                                  MajorPom
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #340

                                  @catogrande said in 6N 2018:

                                  @majorrage said in 6N 2018:

                                  @catogrande Yeah, you are right Cato, that stuff article is not exactly telling the whole picture. I read Guscotts column today as he's pretty good and usually on the money.

                                  The biggest thing that shocked me though, was he didn't list Itoje in his world class players. That's certainly going against the grain of England rugby journalism, who almost seem to have some sort of illness which prevents them saying anything negative, or even neutral about him.

                                  FWIW I think he's been relatively anonymous in this years 6N.

                                  Yeah English rugby journalism have a love affair with Itoje and I sometimes wonder if he asks himself "is it because I'm a poster boy for the black community"? For sure he's a very good player and also he had that long winning streak last season but the wankfest over him has been excessive. He's a pretty intelligent guy so I'd hope it doesn't go to his head - it certainly doesn't seem as though it has affected him going by the odd interview I've seen.

                                  His form since the Lions has not been up there and I'd guess that is for a mixture of reasons. Tiredness, staleness, playing in sides that are not as dominant as they were, mixed messages in game management and likely more. I do think that he's got real potential though, both as a player and as a leader and I really hope he fulfils both.

                                  He has been a fair bit quieter in this years 6N (and far from the only culprit here) but oddly made some impressive line out steals v France. Maybe he's getting his mojo back?

                                  I've often wondered similar from the journo community, not from his.

                                  Don't get me wrong ... he's a great player ... and to call him over rated is not because he's not a fantastic player, it's because (as yet) he's not the once in a generation sort of player which is a mantle many have given him.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                                    Time for Eddie to admit that his selections have been off / players not playing to their ability.

                                    Farrell to 10
                                    Daly and Joseph in midfield

                                    CatograndeC Online
                                    CatograndeC Online
                                    Catogrande
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #341

                                    @mikethesnow said in 6N 2018:

                                    Time for Eddie to admit that his selections have been off / players not playing to their ability.

                                    Farrell to 10
                                    Daly and Joseph in midfield

                                    Ford has not been influencing games like he should, so I can understand the call for Farrell to move in one and TBH I wouldn't be averse to that nowadays. I wouldn't have that midfield though, Daly and Joseph are too much alike. I'd be OK with either Slade or Teo at 12 and then either of the other two at 13. Just which one would likely be dictated by the available wings. With Nowell out and Watson probably at 15 then it would be Daly on the wing.

                                    MiketheSnowM CrucialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • CatograndeC Catogrande

                                      @mikethesnow said in 6N 2018:

                                      Time for Eddie to admit that his selections have been off / players not playing to their ability.

                                      Farrell to 10
                                      Daly and Joseph in midfield

                                      Ford has not been influencing games like he should, so I can understand the call for Farrell to move in one and TBH I wouldn't be averse to that nowadays. I wouldn't have that midfield though, Daly and Joseph are too much alike. I'd be OK with either Slade or Teo at 12 and then either of the other two at 13. Just which one would likely be dictated by the available wings. With Nowell out and Watson probably at 15 then it would be Daly on the wing.

                                      MiketheSnowM Offline
                                      MiketheSnowM Offline
                                      MiketheSnow
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #342

                                      @catogrande said in 6N 2018:

                                      @mikethesnow said in 6N 2018:

                                      Time for Eddie to admit that his selections have been off / players not playing to their ability.

                                      Farrell to 10
                                      Daly and Joseph in midfield

                                      Ford has not been influencing games like he should, so I can understand the call for Farrell to move in one and TBH I wouldn't be averse to that nowadays. I wouldn't have that midfield though, Daly and Joseph are too much alike. I'd be OK with either Slade or Teo at 12 and then either of the other two at 13. Just which one would likely be dictated by the available wings. With Nowell out and Watson probably at 15 then it would be Daly on the wing.

                                      Understand your thoughts on Slade, but Daly is the closest in-form player to the Farrell role.

                                      England won't beat Ireland with Te'O trucking it up. The English back row aren't quick enough to support him.

                                      Wales opened up the Irish midfield quite comfortably, an English backline of Care, Farrell, Daly, Joseph, May, Watson, Brown is the answer IMHO

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • MajorPomM Offline
                                        MajorPomM Offline
                                        MajorPom
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #343

                                        I don't think changing the backline will do much - although perhaps some ball retention skills for that part of the team won't hurt.

                                        A faster, balanced and competitive back row and some proper leadership will change things somewhat.

                                        MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • MajorPomM MajorPom

                                          I don't think changing the backline will do much - although perhaps some ball retention skills for that part of the team won't hurt.

                                          A faster, balanced and competitive back row and some proper leadership will change things somewhat.

                                          MiketheSnowM Offline
                                          MiketheSnowM Offline
                                          MiketheSnow
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #344

                                          @majorrage said in 6N 2018:

                                          I don't think changing the backline will do much - although perhaps some ball retention skills for that part of the team won't hurt.

                                          A faster, balanced and competitive back row and some proper leadership will change things somewhat.

                                          No disputing the backrow situation and solution.

                                          However despite that shortcoming the English backs had more than enough ball against the French to win, they were just ineffectual.

                                          The backline I proposed are proven line breakers and try scorers.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search