Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks v France Test #2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksfrance
830 Posts 75 Posters 75.8k Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • antipodeanA antipodean

    @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

    You mean this?
    https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

    Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy TellB Offline
    Billy Tell
    wrote on last edited by
    #64

    @antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

    @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

    You mean this?
    https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

    Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

    Neither of those 2 are clearly lawyers. In fact, what I like about the whole judicial process is that it is strictly legal. The lawyers don't give a rat's arse whether people want the ABs hung drawn and quartered.

    I'm not a lawyer but one guy threw a punch...if you take that as a precedent then you would have to prove Ofa deliberately set out to maim the French lad...not a chance that gets through a court of law.

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • antipodeanA antipodean

      @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

      @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

      You mean this?
      https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

      Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

      SapetyviS Offline
      SapetyviS Offline
      Sapetyvi
      wrote on last edited by
      #65

      @antipodean Yea, those people don't live in the same reality as the rest of us.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Billy TellB Billy Tell

        @antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

        @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

        @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

        You mean this?
        https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

        Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

        Neither of those 2 are clearly lawyers. In fact, what I like about the whole judicial process is that it is strictly legal. The lawyers don't give a rat's arse whether people want the ABs hung drawn and quartered.

        I'm not a lawyer but one guy threw a punch...if you take that as a precedent then you would have to prove Ofa deliberately set out to maim the French lad...not a chance that gets through a court of law.

        boobooB Offline
        boobooB Offline
        booboo
        wrote on last edited by
        #66

        @billy-tell said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

        @antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

        @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

        @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

        You mean this?
        https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

        Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

        Neither of those 2 are clearly lawyers. In fact, what I like about the whole judicial process is that it is strictly legal. The lawyers don't give a rat's arse whether people want the ABs hung drawn and quartered.

        I'm not a lawyer but one guy threw a punch...if you take that as a precedent then you would have to prove Ofa deliberately set out to maim the French lad...not a chance that gets through a court of law.

        Hence the citing commissioner looked at the legalities and decided no laws had been transgressed.

        boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • boobooB booboo

          @billy-tell said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

          You mean this?
          https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

          Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

          Neither of those 2 are clearly lawyers. In fact, what I like about the whole judicial process is that it is strictly legal. The lawyers don't give a rat's arse whether people want the ABs hung drawn and quartered.

          I'm not a lawyer but one guy threw a punch...if you take that as a precedent then you would have to prove Ofa deliberately set out to maim the French lad...not a chance that gets through a court of law.

          Hence the citing commissioner looked at the legalities and decided no laws had been transgressed.

          boobooB Offline
          boobooB Offline
          booboo
          wrote on last edited by
          #67

          @booboo said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @billy-tell said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @antipodean said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @sapetyvi said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

          @mn5 If you scroll down the that thread, someone mentions there is precedence for a lawsuit from 1996 or whatever.

          You mean this?
          https://twitter.com/JohnFColl/status/1006200921326383106

          Because an accident in an entirely legal element of the game is a very, very different thing to assault.

          Neither of those 2 are clearly lawyers. In fact, what I like about the whole judicial process is that it is strictly legal. The lawyers don't give a rat's arse whether people want the ABs hung drawn and quartered.

          I'm not a lawyer but one guy threw a punch...if you take that as a precedent then you would have to prove Ofa deliberately set out to maim the French lad...not a chance that gets through a court of law.

          Hence the citing commissioner looked at the legalities and decided no laws had been transgressed.

          At least that's what the Illuminati told him to say. Bwahahahaha

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • W Wreck Diver

            Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

            canefanC Offline
            canefanC Offline
            canefan
            wrote on last edited by
            #68

            @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

            Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

            All the conspiracy talk is hilarious. Funny how, for a team who basically gets all the calls from the ref, it took us 24 years between winning world cups

            W ACT CrusaderA 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • canefanC canefan

              @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

              Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

              All the conspiracy talk is hilarious. Funny how, for a team who basically gets all the calls from the ref, it took us 24 years between winning world cups

              W Offline
              W Offline
              Wreck Diver
              wrote on last edited by
              #69

              @canefan It was said we were chokers up until then, now we are dirty thugs that have the referees association in our back pocket and brown paper bags full of cash left at WR HQ in Ireland.

              Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                Wreck Diver
                wrote on last edited by Wreck Diver
                #70

                Rugby vision, has given the French a 2.8% chance of wining this weekend. Is that a bit harsh? I do think the points margin is spot on.
                0_1528805746812_e39529a3-c5ec-48d2-87a9-4c19f73e524b-image.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • W Wreck Diver

                  Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

                  MajorPomM Offline
                  MajorPomM Offline
                  MajorPom
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #71

                  @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                  Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

                  Reading through, it’s actually not too bad. Jones is full of shit as usual, and Gallgher is adamant it’s a red and AB leniency but outside those 2, opinions are fair. Actually to be fair, Gallagher’s problem is with world rugby, not ABs.

                  Cleary thinks red to be consistent with other decisons, but is no buyer of AB ref myths and dirty players. Barnes is actually in full agreeance of everything. Kelleher is similar to Cleary.

                  So actually, Jones is the only one gone full predictable retard. But his opinion counts for nothing, as we all know he rarely writes what he actually thinks.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • MajorPomM MajorPom

                    @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                    Dont let logic get in the way of another AB witch hunt by Nth Hem rugby media, and social media fans. Just wait until Nov it will be ramped up 1000 times.

                    Reading through, it’s actually not too bad. Jones is full of shit as usual, and Gallgher is adamant it’s a red and AB leniency but outside those 2, opinions are fair. Actually to be fair, Gallagher’s problem is with world rugby, not ABs.

                    Cleary thinks red to be consistent with other decisons, but is no buyer of AB ref myths and dirty players. Barnes is actually in full agreeance of everything. Kelleher is similar to Cleary.

                    So actually, Jones is the only one gone full predictable retard. But his opinion counts for nothing, as we all know he rarely writes what he actually thinks.

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    Wreck Diver
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #72

                    @majorrage Nick Cain subscribes to the theory that we get special treatment. I still think the amount of crap in the press leading up till the Nov tests will be worse than normal due to the ABs having not played England in awhile and after the Lions series.

                    F CrucialC Victor MeldrewV 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • W Wreck Diver

                      @canefan It was said we were chokers up until then, now we are dirty thugs that have the referees association in our back pocket and brown paper bags full of cash left at WR HQ in Ireland.

                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #73

                      @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                      @canefan It was said we were chokers up until then, now we are dirty thugs that have the referees association in our back pocket and brown paper bags full of cash left at WR HQ in Ireland.

                      Jones has had to shut up about us being chokers.

                      Jones has had to shut up about us being poachers.

                      Too much to expect that he will just shut up. 🙂

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • W Wreck Diver

                        @majorrage Nick Cain subscribes to the theory that we get special treatment. I still think the amount of crap in the press leading up till the Nov tests will be worse than normal due to the ABs having not played England in awhile and after the Lions series.

                        F Offline
                        F Offline
                        Frank
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #74

                        @wreck-diver
                        Based on the way they're going - England will need 15 points from the ref' when they play us.:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

                        W Victor MeldrewV 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        • PNP Offline
                          PNP Offline
                          PN
                          wrote on last edited by PN
                          #75

                          The fact he is issued with a warning makes the issue worse. WR basically admitting they got it wrong, and yet not issuing any sort of punishment as this would mean theyd be setting a dangerous precedent.

                          RapidoR 1 Reply Last reply
                          2
                          • antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodeanA Offline
                            antipodean
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #76

                            It's entirely possible Freek in his capacity as citing commissioner arrived at this conclusion all on his own. It's just unfortunate that World Rugby is run by incompetents.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • PNP PN

                              The fact he is issued with a warning makes the issue worse. WR basically admitting they got it wrong, and yet not issuing any sort of punishment as this would mean theyd be setting a dangerous precedent.

                              RapidoR Offline
                              RapidoR Offline
                              Rapido
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #77

                              @pn said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                              The fact he is issued with a warning makes the issue worse. WR basically admitting they got it wrong, and yet not issuing any sort of punishment as this would mean theyd be setting a dangerous precedent.

                              Is that how you read it?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                                @canefan It was said we were chokers up until then, now we are dirty thugs that have the referees association in our back pocket and brown paper bags full of cash left at WR HQ in Ireland.

                                Jones has had to shut up about us being chokers.

                                Jones has had to shut up about us being poachers.

                                Too much to expect that he will just shut up. 🙂

                                W Offline
                                W Offline
                                Wreck Diver
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #78

                                @chris-b Im not going to hold my breath 🙂

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • F Frank

                                  @wreck-diver
                                  Based on the way they're going - England will need 15 points from the ref' when they play us.:grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

                                  W Offline
                                  W Offline
                                  Wreck Diver
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #79

                                  @frank that should compensate for aura and the haka.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • W Wreck Diver

                                    @majorrage Nick Cain subscribes to the theory that we get special treatment. I still think the amount of crap in the press leading up till the Nov tests will be worse than normal due to the ABs having not played England in awhile and after the Lions series.

                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    Crucial
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #80

                                    @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                                    @majorrage Nick Cain subscribes to the theory that we get special treatment. I still think the amount of crap in the press leading up till the Nov tests will be worse than normal due to the ABs having not played England in awhile and after the Lions series.

                                    I really don't know how much is click baiting to perpetuate opinions that have been created over years and how much is trying to reinforce those opinions for the future.
                                    Just about any crumb thrown out by UK media about the ABs attracts a torrent of cliched responses about favourable treatment, cheating, the haka, thuggery etc etc
                                    Why change it if it works?

                                    It's just uneducated headline readers with no factual basis to the claims they hold dear. A great example is how apparently the ABs always blame the ref so hard after losses that WR is scared of offending them. Try and find me a quote from Hansen blaming the ref.

                                    W 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • Chris B.C Offline
                                      Chris B.C Offline
                                      Chris B.
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #81

                                      Pah - it is Man. United, Aussie cricket team, dominant team syndrome.

                                      When you're desperate to see someone beaten, their every transgression is magnified ten-fold.

                                      Even worse when they would've been beaten, but the ref. makes a fuck up (Aussie cricket team in Perth). 🙂

                                      But, winners are grinners. Revel in their angst! 🙂

                                      mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      5
                                      • CrucialC Crucial

                                        @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                                        @majorrage Nick Cain subscribes to the theory that we get special treatment. I still think the amount of crap in the press leading up till the Nov tests will be worse than normal due to the ABs having not played England in awhile and after the Lions series.

                                        I really don't know how much is click baiting to perpetuate opinions that have been created over years and how much is trying to reinforce those opinions for the future.
                                        Just about any crumb thrown out by UK media about the ABs attracts a torrent of cliched responses about favourable treatment, cheating, the haka, thuggery etc etc
                                        Why change it if it works?

                                        It's just uneducated headline readers with no factual basis to the claims they hold dear. A great example is how apparently the ABs always blame the ref so hard after losses that WR is scared of offending them. Try and find me a quote from Hansen blaming the ref.

                                        W Offline
                                        W Offline
                                        Wreck Diver
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #82

                                        @crucial All of it is to just keep reinforcing the opinion(in the UK) that we are not good for the game and that we need taking down a peg or 2. They can not stand it how we keep winning and they just cannot fathom why. The advent of twitter hasn't help but just made the opinions stronger. They have a 73% losing record to the AB's at Twickenham they just love that.

                                        CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • W Wreck Diver

                                          @crucial All of it is to just keep reinforcing the opinion(in the UK) that we are not good for the game and that we need taking down a peg or 2. They can not stand it how we keep winning and they just cannot fathom why. The advent of twitter hasn't help but just made the opinions stronger. They have a 73% losing record to the AB's at Twickenham they just love that.

                                          CrucialC Offline
                                          CrucialC Offline
                                          Crucial
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #83

                                          @wreck-diver said in All Blacks v France Test #2:

                                          @crucial All of it is to just keep reinforcing the opinion(in the UK) that we are not good for the game and that we need taking down a peg or 2. They can not stand it how we keep winning and they just cannot fathom why. The advent of twitter hasn't help but just made the opinions stronger. They have a 73% losing record to the AB's at Twickenham they just love that.

                                          I just usually respond by pointing out that it is an old English tradition to introduce sports to the world so that they can show you how to play them better.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search