Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
486 Posts 41 Posters 38.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #476

    @virgil said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

    As I wrong in saying Pakistan had never lost a Test series in the UAE before?
    Quick look back I can see most series either won or drawn.

    Even we drew last time we played there

    Sri Lanka won their series there last year:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lankan_cricket_team_against_Pakistan_in_the_UAE_in_2017–18

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • VirgilV Virgil

      As I wrong in saying Pakistan had never lost a Test series in the UAE before?
      Quick look back I can see most series either won or drawn.

      Even we drew last time we played there

      SiamS Offline
      SiamS Offline
      Siam
      wrote on last edited by Siam
      #477

      @virgil possibly more noteworthy than 2 losses in about 12 years was how they smashed into submission quality teams. Aus and Eng would rock up all keen and by half way through the series the writing was on the wall. Lesser teams were a mere formality

      To people that know cricket, this was a win well worth celebrating

      1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • MokeyM Offline
        MokeyM Offline
        Mokey
        wrote on last edited by
        #478

        Just watched that Day 5 highlights package (nice work, Pakistan cricket, 20 mins is good.) Really good bowling effort, and have to say, good use of the review. Umps got a lot of calls wrong. Ross had some dropsies he will not want to re-watch, and you could just see Stead's pulse rate accelerate when Raval dropped that catch.

        My only complaint, not nearly enough shots of the Pakistan coach watching his team implode. Again.

        canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • MN5M Offline
          MN5M Offline
          MN5
          wrote on last edited by
          #479

          Without heralding false dawn number 127 for the BCs it's encouraging they won when so many batsmen failed. Surely they'll all come right by our home series ( which starts next weekend ! Crikey )

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • MokeyM Mokey

            Just watched that Day 5 highlights package (nice work, Pakistan cricket, 20 mins is good.) Really good bowling effort, and have to say, good use of the review. Umps got a lot of calls wrong. Ross had some dropsies he will not want to re-watch, and you could just see Stead's pulse rate accelerate when Raval dropped that catch.

            My only complaint, not nearly enough shots of the Pakistan coach watching his team implode. Again.

            canefanC Away
            canefanC Away
            canefan
            wrote on last edited by
            #480

            @mokey said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

            Just watched that Day 5 highlights package (nice work, Pakistan cricket, 20 mins is good.) Really good bowling effort, and have to say, good use of the review. Umps got a lot of calls wrong. Ross had some dropsies he will not want to re-watch, and you could just see Stead's pulse rate accelerate when Raval dropped that catch.

            My only complaint, not nearly enough shots of the Pakistan coach watching his team implode. Again.

            Mick Arthur must be sick of coaching teams that choke like dogs

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • MN5M Offline
              MN5M Offline
              MN5
              wrote on last edited by
              #481

              There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

              The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

              CyclopsC 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • MN5M MN5

                There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

                The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

                CyclopsC Offline
                CyclopsC Offline
                Cyclops
                wrote on last edited by
                #482

                @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

                The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

                One of the articles posted above makes the point that the difference was that almost all of our players chipped in through out the series, whereas Pakistan were reliant on a couple of guys going big. That gave us the strength to recover after earlier failures while Pakistan were boom or bust.

                MN5M Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • CyclopsC Cyclops

                  @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                  There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

                  The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

                  One of the articles posted above makes the point that the difference was that almost all of our players chipped in through out the series, whereas Pakistan were reliant on a couple of guys going big. That gave us the strength to recover after earlier failures while Pakistan were boom or bust.

                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5M Offline
                  MN5
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #483

                  @cyclops said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                  @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                  There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

                  The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

                  One of the articles posted above makes the point that the difference was that almost all of our players chipped in through out the series, whereas Pakistan were reliant on a couple of guys going big. That gave us the strength to recover after earlier failures while Pakistan were boom or bust.

                  That's pretty much what Craig McMillan said. We also only got 2 centuries to their 5.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Crazy HorseC Offline
                    Crazy HorseC Offline
                    Crazy Horse
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #484

                    Raval is a shit house catcher. Every time I watch the Craps he seems to drop one.

                    BovidaeB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • CyclopsC Cyclops

                      @mn5 said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                      There's some top quality talk back ( is that an oxymoron) from Devlin calling this one of the great NZ test series wins.

                      The Black Caps were behind Pakistan in every single stat.. ..except the one that mattered. Shah took 29 wickets and his team still lost the series !

                      One of the articles posted above makes the point that the difference was that almost all of our players chipped in through out the series, whereas Pakistan were reliant on a couple of guys going big. That gave us the strength to recover after earlier failures while Pakistan were boom or bust.

                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.C Offline
                      Chris B.
                      wrote on last edited by Chris B.
                      #485

                      @cyclops

                      There's quite an interesting pattern in the run scoring figures.

                      Kane...and Nicholls
                      Four Pakistanis
                      Four New Zealanders

                      Then Safraz, CdG, Imam and Hafeez who all had awful series.

                      And then all the bowlers who batted 8-11, none of whom scored many runs.

                      http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/batting/most_runs_career.html?id=12620;type=series

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

                        Raval is a shit house catcher. Every time I watch the Craps he seems to drop one.

                        BovidaeB Offline
                        BovidaeB Offline
                        Bovidae
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #486

                        @crazy-horse said in Cricket - NZ vs Pakistan:

                        Raval is a shit house catcher. Every time I watch the Craps he seems to drop one.

                        He started off in the slips before being banished to the outfield.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Search
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Search