Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

England v South Africa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
265 Posts 47 Posters 12.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    akan004
    wrote on last edited by akan004
    #6

    That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

    CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • A akan004

      That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

      CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

      That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

      Will certainly be a tough test for England's new back row. Will be some bruises to wear before facing us.

      I also suspect that Itoje may go missing in the tight once he gets smashed by the big Saffas a few times.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • MiketheSnowM Offline
        MiketheSnowM Offline
        MiketheSnow
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        This could go either way but if SA believe they can go 3-1 versus England in 2018

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • BonesB Online
          BonesB Online
          Bones
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          Yeah that forward pack is going to take England to the cleaners.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • CrucialC Crucial

            @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

            That England forward pack should get eaten up by the Bok eight.

            Will certainly be a tough test for England's new back row. Will be some bruises to wear before facing us.

            I also suspect that Itoje may go missing in the tight once he gets smashed by the big Saffas a few times.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            akan004
            wrote on last edited by akan004
            #10

            @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much for this English team.

            CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A akan004

              @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much for this English team.

              CatograndeC Offline
              CatograndeC Offline
              Catogrande
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

              @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much against this English team.

              Alec Hepburn does not look your archetypal loosehead, he looks a bit lightweight, however if his stats on the Exeter Chiefs website are to be believed he's no midget at 6'1" and 17 plus stone. Maybe he gets measured by the same guy that does Ardie Savea?

              He's probably the favoured loosehead at Exeter and rarely does it seem that he's a weak scrimmaging link and he gets about the park and carries well. He's now played at under 20 and senior level for England despite being born in Australia. not sure how he qualifies, parents or Grandparents I guess.

              Edit: Qualifies through his English father, apparently took up rugby at school in England and played county level under 17s.

              CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • CatograndeC Catogrande

                @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

                @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much against this English team.

                Alec Hepburn does not look your archetypal loosehead, he looks a bit lightweight, however if his stats on the Exeter Chiefs website are to be believed he's no midget at 6'1" and 17 plus stone. Maybe he gets measured by the same guy that does Ardie Savea?

                He's probably the favoured loosehead at Exeter and rarely does it seem that he's a weak scrimmaging link and he gets about the park and carries well. He's now played at under 20 and senior level for England despite being born in Australia. not sure how he qualifies, parents or Grandparents I guess.

                Edit: Qualifies through his English father, apparently took up rugby at school in England and played county level under 17s.

                CrucialC Offline
                CrucialC Offline
                Crucial
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                @catogrande said in England v South Africa:

                @akan004 said in England v South Africa:

                @crucial Don't know much about the English loosehead prop but Kyle Sinckler is one of the weakest scrummaging tightheads around. The only question is whether or not the Boks can lift against a team that is not wearing black, if they can then I think they should have too much against this English team.

                Alec Hepburn does not look your archetypal loosehead, he looks a bit lightweight, however if his stats on the Exeter Chiefs website are to be believed he's no midget at 6'1" and 17 plus stone. Maybe he gets measured by the same guy that does Ardie Savea?

                If that's the case he must be about 5'2" to start with

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  I'm always confused about the racial requirements of the boks. It's always in the news, 50% for rwc and 45% now. But that team has only a handful of players of colour. So they make these rules and just ignore them?

                  This will be a tight game, England b vs the boks minus their most important current player. As mentioned above, are the boks up for a non ABs game?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • RapidoR Offline
                    RapidoR Offline
                    Rapido
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

                    CrucialC Billy WebbB 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • RapidoR Rapido

                      2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

                      CrucialC Offline
                      CrucialC Offline
                      Crucial
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @rapido said in England v South Africa:

                      2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

                      lock will be the weak point for England as the game goes on. Could be a clever strategy.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • RapidoR Rapido

                        2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

                        Billy WebbB Offline
                        Billy WebbB Offline
                        Billy Webb
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @rapido said in England v South Africa:

                        2 locks on the bench for Boks. Interesting.

                        Pieter Steph du Toit will most likely be shifted to no. 7 (in your speak = no.6) at some point.
                        My guess is in place of Whitely with Duane moving to 8.

                        So likely subbed off will be Whitely for Lood de Jager(50min) and Etzebeth for RG Snyman(65min)...

                        I am guessing from all of the above that Rassie is expecting a heavy slow paddock requiring lots of grunt up front.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • StargazerS Offline
                          StargazerS Offline
                          Stargazer
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1058324604324847619

                          MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • StargazerS Stargazer

                            https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1058324604324847619

                            MiketheSnowM Offline
                            MiketheSnowM Offline
                            MiketheSnow
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            @stargazer said in England v South Africa:

                            https://twitter.com/EnglandRugby/status/1058324604324847619

                            He is fucking cursed. Poor bastard.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            1
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Machpants
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Jeez base an entire backline around the dreams of one guy and he keeps getting injured. Eddie must be spitting tacks.

                              CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                ACT Crusader
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                England by 3.

                                No QuarterN 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                  England by 3.

                                  No QuarterN Offline
                                  No QuarterN Offline
                                  No Quarter
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                  England by 3.

                                  No way, SA by 2.

                                  ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    Samurai Jack
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    SA by 15

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • No QuarterN No Quarter

                                      @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                      England by 3.

                                      No way, SA by 2.

                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                      ACT Crusader
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      @no-quarter said in England v South Africa:

                                      @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                      England by 3.

                                      No way, SA by 2.

                                      Nah, England all the way. Springboks are my hatiest team. Even cheer for the Aussies when they play each other.

                                      boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Machpants

                                        Jeez base an entire backline around the dreams of one guy and he keeps getting injured. Eddie must be spitting tacks.

                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        CrucialC Offline
                                        Crucial
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        @machpants said in England v South Africa:

                                        Jeez base an entire backline around the dreams of one guy and he keeps getting injured. Eddie must be spitting tacks.

                                        Eggs,baskets and all that.
                                        Eddie’s hopes and dreams hinge around Billy V and Tuilagi

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                                          @no-quarter said in England v South Africa:

                                          @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                          England by 3.

                                          No way, SA by 2.

                                          Nah, England all the way. Springboks are my hatiest team. Even cheer for the Aussies when they play each other.

                                          boobooB Offline
                                          boobooB Offline
                                          booboo
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                          @no-quarter said in England v South Africa:

                                          @act-crusader said in England v South Africa:

                                          England by 3.

                                          No way, SA by 2.

                                          Nah, England all the way. Springboks are my hatiest team. Even cheer for the Aussies when they play each other.

                                          Swap England and SethEfrika for me. Hate England. Always hope they lose.

                                          Last time i hoped they won was the Scotland GS in 1990. Quite liked the way they played with Barnes at 10. The fact they lost with Andrew at 10 serves them right.

                                          CatograndeC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search