Crusaders v Rebels
-
@Stargazer of course, but i thought shark was talking generally the existing stadium was holding them back, not just the period after a new stadium was opened.
-
@SammyC said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Lol they haven’t served Tui at the stadium for several years. True supporters would know that from actually attending games.
Really? I don't know what beer they sell at McLean Park for Magpies games so does that mean I'm not a true supporter? I do however know what beer they serve at Brookvale so I must be a true Manly/Tahs supporter then? :face_with_stuck-out_tongue_winking_eye:
-
@Chester-Draws said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
That is an example when advantage should be over in my book. Rebels might have gone 80m if that pass had stuck. They had a clear advantage.
Instead we go back for a scrum 10 metres back from where the lineout would have been. Especially since it was only a scrum advantage. PK advantage would be different.
And again. Scrum advantage should be over once a team gets clean ball and are free to use it as they wish.
Except that's not what the rules say.
And I prefer referees who play to the actual rules, not dodgy commentators on chat groups.
Oh yeah. What does the law say? Enlighten me.
-
@shark said in Crusaders v Rebels:
I think Jade/AMI Stadium had a capacity of approx 38,000 in 2010. That year we hosted the Wallabies. The brand new Deans Stand was unofficially re-named the Henry stand for the night. The ground was sold out. Prior to that the capacity was greater - possibly closer to 45,000 which at more than 10% of the population was possibly a little high and some tests may not have sold out.
I used to live in Chch, and the attendance at games was often average. More recently, the last game at Jade (which was a good stadium) for the NPC final was aroudn 3,000 (2010). So yeah - a roof may attract more, but the harsh reality of modern stadia is they only get filled intermittently, and the economics really struggle to stack up.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Chester-Draws said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
That is an example when advantage should be over in my book. Rebels might have gone 80m if that pass had stuck. They had a clear advantage.
Instead we go back for a scrum 10 metres back from where the lineout would have been. Especially since it was only a scrum advantage. PK advantage would be different.
And again. Scrum advantage should be over once a team gets clean ball and are free to use it as they wish.
Except that's not what the rules say.
And I prefer referees who play to the actual rules, not dodgy commentators on chat groups.
Oh yeah. What does the law say? Enlighten me.
Fudge it. Can't resist:
Law 7(1):
Advantage:
a. May be tactical. The non-offending team is free to play the ball as they wish.
b. May be territorial. Play has moved towards the offending team’s dead-ball line.
c. May be a combination of tactical and territorial.
d. Must be clear and real. A mere opportunity to gain an advantage is not sufficient.What do you know, I almost quoted the actual law exactly in my post.
-
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Since he probably won't tell you himself, I'm pretty sure that Damo is a ref.
Like, has a whistle and shorts he pulls up his ass, the full deal.
Not a particularly good one, I'm happy to admit. But law knowledge is one of my strengths.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Fudge it. Can't resist:
Law 7(1):
Advantage:
a. May be tactical. The non-offending team is free to play the ball as they wish.
b. May be territorial. Play has moved towards the offending team’s dead-ball line.
c. May be a combination of tactical and territorial.
d. Must be clear and real. A mere opportunity to gain an advantage is not sufficient.Although I love it when refs play short advantages (as in call advantage over, not blow the whistle for no advantage), I do think there are lot of opportunities for a and d to contradict each other.
I.e - if you pass the ball to somebody 5 m behind the advantage line with nobody in front of them. At that point you satisfy a, advan over. Then if drop it ... did they get a, or did d come into play?
Hard to judge really.
-
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@SammyC said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Lol they haven’t served Tui at the stadium for several years. True supporters would know that from actually attending games.
Really? I don't know what beer they sell at McLean Park for Magpies games so does that mean I'm not a true supporter? I do however know what beer they serve at Brookvale so I must be a true Manly/Tahs supporter then? :face_with_stuck-out_tongue_winking_eye:
You’re from Sydney and Hawkes bay and work at a film school or something don’t you?
I highly doubt you even drink beer, probably just sip on shitty Sav Blanc and lattes aye
-
@SammyC said in Crusaders v Rebels:
You’re from Sydney and Hawkes bay and work at a film school or something don’t you?
I highly doubt you even drink beer, probably just sip on shitty Sav Blanc and lattes aye
Dunno if the above is accurate or not, but the above reeks of being a craft beer piston wristed gibbon surely!
-
@MajorRage said in Crusaders v Rebels:
I do think there are lot of opportunities for a and d to contradict each other.
I.e - if you pass the ball to somebody 5 m behind the advantage line with nobody in front of them. At that point you satisfy a, advan over. Then if drop it ... did they get a, or did d come into play?I'd have to see it, but could be either in my book.
The advantage law gives a huge amount of discretion to the referee.
In the last year and a half, there has been a trend towards longer advantages for scrum offences. I don't like it. Others may.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Since he probably won't tell you himself, I'm pretty sure that Damo is a ref.
Like, has a whistle and shorts he pulls up his ass, the full deal.
Not a particularly good one, I'm happy to admit. But law knowledge is one of my strengths.
You seem qualified to be a Super Rugby ref. It's probably the second part that is letting you down.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
In the last year and a half, there has been a trend towards longer advantages for scrum offences. I don't like it. Others may.
Longer advantages in general annoy me. It's wasted time. Modern defences don't break down in a few phases any more - so for me, if you don't see real advantage within 2-3 phases, go back and play the penalty (or scrum after 1 decent phase). It's even more irritating when some refs play two pass advantages from knock ons, and others wait to see how kicks go before they whistle up something.
Tough job, but coudl be done more consistently
-
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@gt12 said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Since he probably won't tell you himself, I'm pretty sure that Damo is a ref.
Like, has a whistle and shorts he pulls up his ass, the full deal.
Not a particularly good one, I'm happy to admit. But law knowledge is one of my strengths.
You seem qualified to be a Super Rugby ref. It's probably the second part that is letting you down.
Poor peripheral vision/awareness, a general inability to process multiple things all at once and a lack of fitness lets me down. Some people just aren't made to be great refs I think. Still, I have found my level (first XV college stuff) and really enjoy secondary school rugby much more than senior club rugby.
But I do not appreciate people telling me what the rules say without even bothering to quote them or provide a law reference.
-
@Canes4life said in Crusaders v Rebels:
In replace of who though? Man we have some talent in NZ atm.
My backs atm are: Smith, Perenara, Hall, Barrett, Mo'unga, Leinert-Brown, Laumape, Goodhue, Crotty, Ioane, Bridge, Barrett, Smith, assuming they go with 13 backs - add in Ennor if they take 14.
I'd take Ennor ahead of Bridge. It's super handy to have a guy who covers centre as well as the back 3. The guy has been the find of the season IMHO. In saying that Bridge, Havili and Reece have also played well for the Crusaders. Ioane, B Smith and J Barrett are certainties IMO, so one place open in the back 3.
-
@taniwharugby said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Stargazer of course, but i thought shark was talking generally the existing stadium was holding them back, not just the period after a new stadium was opened.
I'm saying the shit stadium is a special hindrance in finals games which would otherwise attract more fans and alleviate the costs of hosting games. I'm assuming you're au fait with the SANZAAR arrangement which sees the host side cover a large chunk of the visiting team's costs. I referenced 2018 where we barely made a dollar after hosting the Lions because of the high value of our share to host them. The ground was packed and I'd be surprised if they couldn't have sold 30,000+ tickets and made some decent coin if we were in any decent stadium. A brand new one might be worth another 5-10,000 punters even.
A rematch with the Rebels would be a financial disaster because noone would go, expecting to be able to attend a game or games over the following weeks, and the cost of hosting would be higher than if it were the Chiefs, who would also put more bums on seats.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Chester-Draws said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
That is an example when advantage should be over in my book. Rebels might have gone 80m if that pass had stuck. They had a clear advantage.
Instead we go back for a scrum 10 metres back from where the lineout would have been. Especially since it was only a scrum advantage. PK advantage would be different.
And again. Scrum advantage should be over once a team gets clean ball and are free to use it as they wish.
Except that's not what the rules say.
And I prefer referees who play to the actual rules, not dodgy commentators on chat groups.
Oh yeah. What does the law say? Enlighten me.
Fudge it. Can't resist:
Law 7(1):
Advantage:
a. May be tactical. The non-offending team is free to play the ball as they wish.
b. May be territorial. Play has moved towards the offending team’s dead-ball line.
c. May be a combination of tactical and territorial.
d. Must be clear and real. A mere opportunity to gain an advantage is not sufficient.I think that d. is the bit that annoys most viewers. This is exactly the previously described scenario where a player in the clear is passed to but drops the ball. Laws say that opportunity is not sufficient but to the viewer it looks like the team has already experienced an advantage to the point where they could have done well.
The other annoying one doesn't happen that often but can be awful. That is when a team is on attack in the 'red zone' and they keep making small inroads breaking down the defence. It can go on for ever giving them every chance to score a try before a handling error dictates going back.
-
@SammyC said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@Nepia said in Crusaders v Rebels:
@SammyC said in Crusaders v Rebels:
Lol they haven’t served Tui at the stadium for several years. True supporters would know that from actually attending games.
Really? I don't know what beer they sell at McLean Park for Magpies games so does that mean I'm not a true supporter? I do however know what beer they serve at Brookvale so I must be a true Manly/Tahs supporter then? :face_with_stuck-out_tongue_winking_eye:
You’re from Sydney and Hawkes bay and work at a film school or something don’t you?
I highly doubt you even drink beer, probably just sip on shitty Sav Blanc and lattes aye
Damn, you're looking to get cut mother fudger! I'm from Hawkes Bay and just happen to live in Sydney ... sadly I don't work at the film school anymore which is annoying as I don't get wander round the film studios anymore.
Wine??? Lattes??? You're 0/4. Despite being from HB I don't drink wine and I like coffee not milk so no lattes for me.
-
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
The advantage law gives a huge amount of discretion to the referee.
Yeah. You actually missed out "The referee deems..." bit in when advantage is over. 7.2 I think... but is relevant to your point - basically the ref decides and players and fans have to adjust to the ref's "deeming" advantage to be over.
@Damo said in Crusaders v Rebels:
But I do not appreciate people telling me what the rules say without even bothering to quote them or provide a law reference.
He implied that I don't watch rugby on another thread. I mentioned that I needed to watch more rugby to my wife - she replied that it wasn't possible and that he had obviously never met me. I wouldn't give too much credit to some peoples comments on here.
-
@Crucial said in Crusaders v Rebels:
I think that d. is the bit that annoys most viewers.
Simple solution - remove d).
