Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Cricket: NZ vs Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
1.4k Posts 62 Posters 129.2k Views 5 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • No QuarterN No Quarter

    @Xpat61 said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @No-Quarter
    Total Ambush!!!
    But I remain positive!!

    Yeah, I'm certain the Black Caps arrived at the ground expecting to play Sri Lanka's military medium pacers as usual.

    DonsteppaD Online
    DonsteppaD Online
    Donsteppa
    wrote on last edited by
    #386

    @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @Xpat61 said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

    @No-Quarter
    Total Ambush!!!
    But I remain positive!!

    Yeah, I'm certain the Black Caps arrived at the ground expecting to play Sri Lanka's military medium pacers as usual.

    I’m starting to wonder.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • No QuarterN No Quarter

      Hold on I was only half watching that. I didn't see any hot-spot or snicko? Why was that out?

      DonsteppaD Online
      DonsteppaD Online
      Donsteppa
      wrote on last edited by
      #387

      @No-Quarter said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

      Hold on I was only half watching that. I didn't see any hot-spot or snicko? Why was that out?

      Hometown decision.

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Chris B.C Online
        Chris B.C Online
        Chris B.
        wrote on last edited by
        #388

        CdG gets a roughie, I think.

        No evidence that hit anything except the helmet.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • No QuarterN Online
          No QuarterN Online
          No Quarter
          wrote on last edited by
          #389

          So it's impossible to overturn a caught behind. What an absurd decision.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • No QuarterN Online
            No QuarterN Online
            No Quarter
            wrote on last edited by
            #390

            Comms falling over themselves to justify the decision. That was an absolute shocker. Objectively wrong.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • westcoastieW Offline
              westcoastieW Offline
              westcoastie
              wrote on last edited by
              #391

              Getting absolutely reeeeemed.

              Also thinking they'll enforce the follow-on if possible. Bat until the start of the third session tomorrow and rip us out again.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • No QuarterN Online
                No QuarterN Online
                No Quarter
                wrote on last edited by
                #392

                These comms are fucking painful. Yeah I'm sure CdG actually wanted to be given out so he didn't have to face Starc again. What the fuck are they talking about.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • MokeyM Offline
                  MokeyM Offline
                  Mokey
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #393

                  162/8. So, so painful. And disappointing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • SnowyS Offline
                    SnowyS Offline
                    Snowy
                    wrote on last edited by Snowy
                    #394

                    When did they change the rules so that caught off the helmet was out?

                    boobooB SiamS 2 Replies Last reply
                    1
                    • SnowyS Snowy

                      When did they change the rules so that caught off the helmet was out?

                      boobooB Offline
                      boobooB Offline
                      booboo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #395

                      @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                      When did they change the rules so that caught off the helmet was out?

                      When Australia

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • SnowyS Offline
                        SnowyS Offline
                        Snowy
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #396

                        Only the back foot being outside is a no ball right?

                        SiamS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • MokeyM Offline
                          MokeyM Offline
                          Mokey
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #397

                          We're all out for 166, Aus back in for their second innings.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • K Offline
                            K Offline
                            kev
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #398

                            The bowling effort was admirable. One bowler down ( LF’s choice proved to be a mistake anyway ) and some reasonable discipline, bowling to fields set.

                            However, our Achilles heel for the series was always going to be batting. Aussies have the 3 best quicks in world cricket ( speed, bounce, movement esp. with pink ball, accuracy ) and Blackcaps always struggled when the dial is turned up. Not sure how they have prepared for the change but evidence is we still haven’t got that right.

                            Still this is a quality team and hopefully they can work it out. Jeet has to go for now though. Hopefully we can put up a better effort 2nd innings.

                            Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • SnowyS Snowy

                              Only the back foot being outside is a no ball right?

                              SiamS Offline
                              SiamS Offline
                              Siam
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #399

                              @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                              Only the back foot being outside is a no ball right?

                              I'm a bit confused about that. I know the back foot only has to touch the return crease, the one that runs parallel to the pitch, for a no ball. But not sure about the front foot, other than it can touch the return crease.

                              Staggered that a whole foot out of the white painted crease " box" is legal in any way shape or form.

                              Anyone got the oil on that?

                              boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • K kev

                                The bowling effort was admirable. One bowler down ( LF’s choice proved to be a mistake anyway ) and some reasonable discipline, bowling to fields set.

                                However, our Achilles heel for the series was always going to be batting. Aussies have the 3 best quicks in world cricket ( speed, bounce, movement esp. with pink ball, accuracy ) and Blackcaps always struggled when the dial is turned up. Not sure how they have prepared for the change but evidence is we still haven’t got that right.

                                Still this is a quality team and hopefully they can work it out. Jeet has to go for now though. Hopefully we can put up a better effort 2nd innings.

                                Chris B.C Online
                                Chris B.C Online
                                Chris B.
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #400

                                @kev I don't think the batting is an Achilles heel - it's just a different game when you're facing up to 6 ft 5 bowlers who can hurl it down at 145+kmh in Perth.

                                K 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • SnowyS Snowy

                                  When did they change the rules so that caught off the helmet was out?

                                  SiamS Offline
                                  SiamS Offline
                                  Siam
                                  wrote on last edited by Siam
                                  #401

                                  @Snowy said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:

                                  When did they change the rules so that caught off the helmet was out?

                                  Well done ICC, you just created a situation where your DRS system was deemed completely pointless.

                                  You can't allow and not allow on the same piece of evidence. The cameras and technology are either right or they are not. Rewarding a wrong decision is a ludicrous situation

                                  The cricket on display in the world lately has been exemplary, the umpiring principles have been so erratic and flawed that one wonders if the outcome of the contest runs second fiddle to the hype and entertainment package.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                    @kev I don't think the batting is an Achilles heel - it's just a different game when you're facing up to 6 ft 5 bowlers who can hurl it down at 145+kmh in Perth.

                                    K Offline
                                    K Offline
                                    kev
                                    wrote on last edited by kev
                                    #402

                                    @Chris-B For this series it already is. You can’t win or draw if you post 160 odd runs. So we have to make adjustments quickly. The quality of the bowling attack will not change.

                                    Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • K kev

                                      @Chris-B For this series it already is. You can’t win or draw if you post 160 odd runs. So we have to make adjustments quickly. The quality of the bowling attack will not change.

                                      Chris B.C Online
                                      Chris B.C Online
                                      Chris B.
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #403

                                      @kev I guess I look at it a bit differently - in that I'd say our batting line-up is much-of-a-muchness with Australia's.

                                      The problem is that on this sort of pitch (and in fact most pitches) their bowlers are better.

                                      We can certainly bat better than we did in the first innings - but, our bowlers also need to find a way to bowl them out much faster.

                                      mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Chris B.C Online
                                        Chris B.C Online
                                        Chris B.
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #404

                                        Santner misses a run out and now Colin drops a catch.

                                        Got to be taking everything!!!

                                        voodooV 1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • Chris B.C Chris B.

                                          Santner misses a run out and now Colin drops a catch.

                                          Got to be taking everything!!!

                                          voodooV Offline
                                          voodooV Offline
                                          voodoo
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #405

                                          @Chris-B does it really matter at this stage? I can't see how it matters how many wickets they lose on the way to putting us back in with 600 runs needed?

                                          Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search