Cricket: NZ vs Aus
-
It's a shame that after all the 85/86 and "best team ever to go to" hype, instead this is just another business as usual hiding to start a test series in Australia. Those 2004 analogies unfortunately look more apt at this stage. Hoping for a Bolt led MCG bounceback now.
-
@NTA said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
Game to be abandoned after pitch became unplayable.
0-0 going into Melbourne
Which also got abandoned after pitch deemed unplayable and then 5 days of rain in Sydney
0-0 worst Christmas ever and New Zealand never invited back
-
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
@canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
You must have made a mistake. For lbw, ball can pitch outside off stump. It cannot pitch outside leg stump.
-
A mosque shooting in Perth would be handy right about now.
Just saying
Or an ISIS attack on the casino, ( just to keep everyone happy
)Too narcissistic?? Too soon?
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
A mosque shooting in Perth would be handy right about now.
Just saying
Or an ISIS attack on the casino, ( just to keep everyone happy
)Too narcissistic?? Too soon?
That's a bit drastic.
Really all we need is for these guys to bat for 3.5-4 sessions and then get support from the tail.
-
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
A mosque shooting in Perth would be handy right about now.
Just saying
Or an ISIS attack on the casino, ( just to keep everyone happy
)Too narcissistic?? Too soon?
That's a bit drastic.
Really all we need is for these guys to bat for 3.5-4 sessions and then get support from the tail.
@Damo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Siam said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
A mosque shooting in Perth would be handy right about now.
Just saying
Or an ISIS attack on the casino, ( just to keep everyone happy
)Too narcissistic?? Too soon?
That's a bit drastic.
Really all we need is for these guys to bat for 3.5-4 sessions and then get support from the tail.
You're right. I'll make some phone calls....
-
@canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
You must have made a mistake. For lbw, ball can pitch outside off stump. It cannot pitch outside leg stump.
@Damo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
You must have made a mistake. For lbw, ball can pitch outside off stump. It cannot pitch outside leg stump.
I didn't think so but I must have. It was off Santner's bowling, can't remember exactly but it definitely pitched outside off
-
@Damo said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@canefan said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
You must have made a mistake. For lbw, ball can pitch outside off stump. It cannot pitch outside leg stump.
I didn't think so but I must have. It was off Santner's bowling, can't remember exactly but it definitely pitched outside off
-
@canefan always remember there's actually no provision in the law for "pitching" outside off.
"Hitting" outside the line is the relevant thing, while playing a shot
-
One of our DRS challenges for LBW was dismissed because the ball pitched outside off (or so I thought the comms said). So why was Latham given out?
-
@Donsteppa Christ - we don't need freak dismissals hastening the demise!
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Donsteppa Christ - we don't need freak dismissals hastening the demise!
Watling is still there for one half of the '89 partnership. [/straw clutching]
-
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Donsteppa Christ - we don't need freak dismissals hastening the demise!
Watling is still there for one half of the '89 partnership. [/straw clutching]
@Donsteppa hasn't actually been impossible to bat out there so far, so being five down is a bit disappointing. If we'd played really well and had more luck we might have been only two or three down.
Ball is likely to play tricks in the final session - I don't think we'll need to set aside time for cricket watching tomorrow!
-
@Donsteppa hasn't actually been impossible to bat out there so far, so being five down is a bit disappointing. If we'd played really well and had more luck we might have been only two or three down.
Ball is likely to play tricks in the final session - I don't think we'll need to set aside time for cricket watching tomorrow!
@Chris-B said in Cricket: NZ vs Aus:
@Donsteppa hasn't actually been impossible to bat out there so far, so being five down is a bit disappointing. If we'd played really well and had more luck we might have been only two or three down.
Ball is likely to play tricks in the final session - I don't think we'll need to set aside time for cricket watching tomorrow!
We are done for sure
