Australia v India
-
My only grrr around DRS is ones like that. That is out. When it is got that much on the bail, it's out!
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
My only grrr around DRS is ones like that. That is out. When it is got that much on the bail, it's out!
Yep, that looked pretty solid. I guess it allows for any margin of error in ball tracking from that far out though.
Either way, perhaps Gill will use his bat from now on.
-
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
My only grrr around DRS is ones like that. That is out. When it is got that much on the bail, it's out!
Yep, that looked pretty solid. I guess it allows for any margin of error in ball tracking from that far out though.
Either way, perhaps Gill will use his bat from now on.
@Donsteppa said in Australia v India:
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
My only grrr around DRS is ones like that. That is out. When it is got that much on the bail, it's out!
Yep, that looked pretty solid. I guess it allows for any margin of error in ball tracking from that far out though.
And that's it, isn't it? If that's 10cm from the stumps it's out out out. If it's as far down the track as that was, there's margin of error that amplifies the further the ball has to go.
I'd be happy to write 'benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman' into the rules, and tweak the DRS. It's there to avoid howlers; that wasn't a howler, it was a tactical review
-
@Donsteppa said in Australia v India:
@Hooroo said in Australia v India:
My only grrr around DRS is ones like that. That is out. When it is got that much on the bail, it's out!
Yep, that looked pretty solid. I guess it allows for any margin of error in ball tracking from that far out though.
And that's it, isn't it? If that's 10cm from the stumps it's out out out. If it's as far down the track as that was, there's margin of error that amplifies the further the ball has to go.
I'd be happy to write 'benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman' into the rules, and tweak the DRS. It's there to avoid howlers; that wasn't a howler, it was a tactical review
@nzzp said in Australia v India:
I'd be happy to write 'benefit of the doubt goes to the batsman' into the rules, and tweak the DRS. It's there to avoid howlers; that wasn't a howler, it was a tactical review
That is in the rules already, but the benefit doesn't go to the batsman, it goes to the umpire. Which I think is the right way to do it.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
Warne very critical of the field.
It's getting tedious! We get it, Warne, it's not what you want.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
Warne very critical of the field.
It's getting tedious! We get it, Warne, it's not what you want.
-
@KiwiMurph said in Australia v India:
@Hooroo that's Warne on commentary for you.
That hat is for tools too! Craig McMillan, I'm looking at you too.
-
Warne does know his shit, but he's just critical all the fucking time.
We get it Shane, you think you should have captained Australia...
-
@Chris-B said in Australia v India:
If I were Lyon, I'd have a bat pad on the off side to Pujara.
Very surprised he hasn't!
I can't understand it???
-
@Chris-B said in Australia v India:
If I were Lyon, I'd have a bat pad on the off side to Pujara.
Very surprised he hasn't!
Might have stopped that four with his throat....
-
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
-
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
@Crucial said in Australia v India:
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
If Dravid is The Wall, this guy would keep the Mongols out 400 years ago
-
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
@Crucial I think the Australians will be getting a bit worried.
For India, the first two sessions today are about saving the test, the third session might be about winning it.
For the Aussies it could be the reverse.
Pujara taking the shine off the ball and wearing the bowlers down. And I think they're only about 15 runs shy of where they probably need to to be in this session.
-
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
@Crucial said in Australia v India:
Pujara 6 runs off 52 balls! Dravid like numbers.
I would be happy for this to be a draw. Puts more pressure on both teams to win future games for Test Champ points. Oz are already in need of a decent win % from here to close out their spot so a draw would be good for NZs chances (if I have got that right)
Australia vs SA series is not confirmed yet, so if they win or draw, they can can cancel that series knowing they have a higher percentage than NZ.
