SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average
Zero pillar defence.
@kiwimurph said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
And the blues offer a huge gap, defence rather average
Zero pillar defence.
Like the ABs for a fair few years
-
@yeetyaah said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
No way he's held, fucking bullshit
You don't think he was tackled? It's pretty fucken simple - can't hold the player on the ground, tackler must release. If that's the rules then tackles like that must be called correctly.
Or would you rather players having to hold the player on the ground?
-
The Blues breakdown work is very average ..Chiefs who met in the car park on Tuesday doing well ..
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Little half back pile driving huge lock, lol
Looks more like the huge lock trying to go to ground while the little half back was holding his legs
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Little half back pile driving huge lock, lol
FFS there's more damage from big Karl coming in to cleanout.
-
@bones said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
@chris said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
FFS Fraser you prodantic prick
So close
Haha have edited
-
I know its part of their game plan, but surely having someone with Robinson's workrate closer to the ball is better than stationed on the wing as they have him so often.
-
@machpants said in SRA Round 10: Blues v Chiefs:
Little half back pile driving huge lock, lol
FFS there's more damage from big Karl coming in to cleanout.
@antipodean oh yeah entirely nothing, just the players involved made me chortle.
Try methinks
