Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Black Caps - Bangladesh tour 2021

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
231 Posts 22 Posters 6.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L LABCAT

    @canes4life said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

    As a former HIBS lad it’s awesome to see two of them in the Black Caps side tonight.

    The start of long careers for NZ I hope. I don’t think this pitch suits Ben Sears though.

    He might not even get a bowl.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    LABCAT
    wrote on last edited by
    #79

    @labcat said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

    @canes4life said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

    As a former HIBS lad it’s awesome to see two of them in the Black Caps side tonight.

    The start of long careers for NZ I hope. I don’t think this pitch suits Ben Sears though.

    He might not even get a bowl.

    Just took a good catch though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • JKJ Offline
      JKJ Offline
      JK
      wrote on last edited by
      #80

      3 wickets and all of a sudden we are back

      nzzpN JKJ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • JKJ JK

        3 wickets and all of a sudden we are back

        nzzpN Offline
        nzzpN Offline
        nzzp
        wrote on last edited by
        #81

        @jk said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

        3 wickets and all of a sudden we are back

        120 is a tough chase on these wickets

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • JKJ JK

          3 wickets and all of a sudden we are back

          JKJ Offline
          JKJ Offline
          JK
          wrote on last edited by
          #82

          @jk said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

          3 wickets and all of a sudden we are back

          Didn’t watch any of game 1 but am watching this and didn’t realise no crowds there either. Pumped in crowd noises tho

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • JKJ Offline
            JKJ Offline
            JK
            wrote on last edited by
            #83

            Need Naim out for my no 50s bet.

            JKJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • DonsteppaD Offline
              DonsteppaD Offline
              Donsteppa
              wrote on last edited by
              #84

              Leaking too many runs.

              Blundell too far in from the boundary there

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • JKJ JK

                Need Naim out for my no 50s bet.

                JKJ Offline
                JKJ Offline
                JK
                wrote on last edited by
                #85

                @jk said in Black Caps vs Bangladesh:

                Need Naim out for my no 50s bet.

                Yes!!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • DonsteppaD Offline
                  DonsteppaD Offline
                  Donsteppa
                  wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
                  #86

                  What is with our outfielders missing out on wickets and conceding fours and sixes by fielding too far in from the rope? Careless AF

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Offline
                    L Offline
                    LABCAT
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #87

                    Seemers showing how stupid our selectors are for not sending more spinners.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • Canes4lifeC Online
                      Canes4lifeC Online
                      Canes4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #88

                      Lol why aren’t our fielders on the boundary? Some seriously sloppy cricket in this game. Could have saved a tone of runs.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • DonsteppaD Offline
                        DonsteppaD Offline
                        Donsteppa
                        wrote on last edited by Donsteppa
                        #89

                        Bennett’s Pies. Another poor selection.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JKJ Offline
                          JKJ Offline
                          JK
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #90

                          Alright then….here we go with the batting bit

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • DonsteppaD Offline
                            DonsteppaD Offline
                            Donsteppa
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #91

                            Both openers looked like they were just trying to swat and hope before a good one got their number.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • L Offline
                              L Offline
                              LABCAT
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #92

                              Latham has batted brilliantly but unfortunately didn't have any support from the rest of the team.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • canefanC Online
                                canefanC Online
                                canefan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #93

                                Latham trying to will them over the line. We come up short.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  LABCAT
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #94

                                  Being only 5 wickets down is a bit disappointing, suggests the batters were a bit too cautious. Could have a least sent Bracewell up the order to try a fluke a few boundaries.

                                  I know this is essentially our A team but the selections are all wrong. Blundell shouldn't be opening and we shouldn't be playing three seamers (not much choice but could at have picked Kuggeleijn who can hold a bat).

                                  GodderG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • L LABCAT

                                    Being only 5 wickets down is a bit disappointing, suggests the batters were a bit too cautious. Could have a least sent Bracewell up the order to try a fluke a few boundaries.

                                    I know this is essentially our A team but the selections are all wrong. Blundell shouldn't be opening and we shouldn't be playing three seamers (not much choice but could at have picked Kuggeleijn who can hold a bat).

                                    GodderG Offline
                                    GodderG Offline
                                    Godder
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #95

                                    @labcat Based on earlier posts about 100 being a good score in Bangladesh, I don't know that we can really conclude that the selections were all wrong or anything else about the game plan. Maybe Bangladesh are just hard at home, and we don't have our best team available, so we lost.

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • RapidoR Offline
                                      RapidoR Offline
                                      Rapido
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #96

                                      Not bad.

                                      Although that might be our best game of the series.

                                      Fielding sloppy, though.

                                      Much better pitch. But, even so, too much seam. Need minimum 3 and a half spinners. But hands are tied now.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ARHSA Offline
                                        ARHSA Offline
                                        ARHS
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #97

                                        Surely Kuggeleijn plays next time. Weird use of Sears. Need a boundary hitter firing in top order too. Maybe Finn Allen comes in.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • DonsteppaD Offline
                                          DonsteppaD Offline
                                          Donsteppa
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #98

                                          Bring Allen in for one of the seamers. Time for CDG to step up with the ball (and with the bat and in the field, for that matter).

                                          canefanC 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search