The Trans Tasman Rugby War
-
@machpants That would mean the end of NPC rugby in Northland, Southland, Counties, and two of Otago, Harbour and Manawatu.
@stargazer said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@machpants That would mean the end of NPC rugby in Northland, Southland, Counties, and two of Otago, Harbour and Manawatu.
Nah, just have a 2nd division. Any NZ team that finishes below all the Aussie teams is relegated and replaced with a div 2 team
-
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
-
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
@mariner4life said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
Imagine how they would treat us if the roles were reversed? Just look at the Warriors, the Breakers and the Nix
-
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
@mariner4life said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
Our five pro teams have regular "boys on the booze" flair ups, but we still absolutely flog them. They're about the 7th best team in the world.
We're bound by geography though, and it will never change. Hopefully their group of dumb assholes will by a clue in the next decade.
-
@mariner4life said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
Our five pro teams have regular "boys on the booze" flair ups, but we still absolutely flog them. They're about the 7th best team in the world.
We're bound by geography though, and it will never change. Hopefully their group of dumb assholes will by a clue in the next decade.
@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@mariner4life said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
Our five pro teams have regular "boys on the booze" flair ups, but we still absolutely flog them. They're about the 7th best team in the world.
We're bound by geography though, and it will never change. Hopefully their group of dumb assholes will by a clue in the next decade.
Ya reckon they will? Even at their peak RA preferred to pay over the odds for league converts instead of spending the money to develop the game at the grass roots level. That's not a viable longterm strategy
-
@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@mariner4life said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Acknowledge they're shit. Acknowledge they hate us.
Cut them loose.
Play a Bledisloe every 3 years. Which they lose by 60 because apparently Shute Shield isn't good enough
Laugh
Fuck 'em, who cares
Our five pro teams have regular "boys on the booze" flair ups, but we still absolutely flog them. They're about the 7th best team in the world.
We're bound by geography though, and it will never change. Hopefully their group of dumb assholes will by a clue in the next decade.
Ya reckon they will? Even at their peak RA preferred to pay over the odds for league converts instead of spending the money to develop the game at the grass roots level. That's not a viable longterm strategy
-
These are the new franchises:
Northland and North Harbour
Auckland
Counties and BOP
Waikato and Taranaki
Manawatu and Hawkes Bay
Wellington
Ta$man
Canterbury
Otago and Southland
Moana Pasifika@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
These are the new franchises:
Northland and North Harbour
Auckland
Counties and BOP
Waikato and Taranaki
> Manawatu and Hawkes Bay
Wellington
Ta$man
Canterbury
Otago and Southland
Moana PasifikaYou'll be right behind this.
-
@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
These are the new franchises:
Northland and North Harbour
Auckland
Counties and BOP
Waikato and Taranaki
> Manawatu and Hawkes Bay
Wellington
Ta$man
Canterbury
Otago and Southland
Moana PasifikaYou'll be right behind this.
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
-
Given the chance, Aus would fuck over NZ without giving it a seconds thought. Anybody who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves. Ultimately you have to do what's in your own interests. Japan is where we should be focussing all our efforts.
-
Given the chance, Aus would fuck over NZ without giving it a seconds thought. Anybody who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves. Ultimately you have to do what's in your own interests. Japan is where we should be focussing all our efforts.
@rancid-schnitzel said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
Given the chance, Aus would fuck over NZ without giving it a seconds thought. Anybody who thinks otherwise is kidding themselves. Ultimately you have to do what's in your own interests. Japan is where we should be focussing all our efforts.
Agree. Oz have form in that regard
-
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
@taniwharugby said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
Well both teams are north of Auckland, they could call it something like … I dunno … North Auckland?
-
@taniwharugby said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
Well both teams are north of Auckland, they could call it something like … I dunno … North Auckland?
@jc said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@taniwharugby said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
Well both teams are north of Auckland, they could call it something like … I dunno … North Auckland?
North of, not northern part of. So no.
The NotJAFA Taniwhas would be better
-
@taniwharugby said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@gt12 someone had to do it.
I'd hate losing Northland, but if merging was the only way we survived and part of something, I'd grudgingly get over it and go along screaming and.bitching to watch Northland Harbour play..but we know nzr won't make any changes so drastic.
Well both teams are north of Auckland, they could call it something like … I dunno … North Auckland?
@jc wont happen, so I'll stick with Northland Harbour, which would obviously be shortened to Northland!
BUt you might be onto something!
-
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
-
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
I agree that we need each other. But we can't depend on them, they don't want to be a team player
-
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
Do we though? I agree that cooperation is best for both parties, at least from a content standpoint. But I don't think we need them.
-
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
Do we though? I agree that cooperation is best for both parties, at least from a content standpoint. But I don't think we need them.
@rancid-schnitzel said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
Do we though? I agree that cooperation is best for both parties, at least from a content standpoint. But I don't think we need them.
From the point of view of having a bigger product to sell to broadcasters, SA NZ and RA need each other
-
@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
These are the new franchises:
Northland and North Harbour
Auckland
Counties and BOP
Waikato and Taranaki
> Manawatu and Hawkes Bay
Wellington
Ta$man
Canterbury
Otago and Southland
Moana PasifikaYou'll be right behind this.
@gt12 said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@tim said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
These are the new franchises:
Northland and North Harbour
Auckland
Counties and BOP
Waikato and Taranaki
> Manawatu and Hawkes Bay
Wellington
Ta$man
Canterbury
Otago and Southland
Moana PasifikaYou'll be right behind this.
-
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
Do we though? I agree that cooperation is best for both parties, at least from a content standpoint. But I don't think we need them.
@rancid-schnitzel said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
@damo said in The Trans Ta$man Rugby War:
The idea we won't keep cooperating with Australia is daft in my opinion.
We need them and they need us. All this posturing from Australia is unhelpful, but we can't just ditch them.
For a long time, Australia had replaced SA as our primary foes. We cannot forget that just because Australia are going through a downswing.
Just playing NPC would be dull, and most casual fans wouldn't be interested. You can't just ignore the casual fans.
Do we though? I agree that cooperation is best for both parties, at least from a content standpoint. But I don't think we need them.
i think the NPC would always tick along...but it would never make enough money on its own to compete with what the players could get overseas so we would see more and more drift away
a TT or pacific comp probably earns enough to at least keep a core of the top players in the region
