Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

All Blacks vs Pumas II

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
allblacksargentina
1.1k Posts 75 Posters 89.1k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dan54D Dan54

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    @act-crusader yikes

    I suggest ALB is probably our first choice 12, and Goodhue our first choice 13 ... But not sure those who count see it that way

    I always reckon ALB is a better 13 than Goodhue, and Havili is now best 12 we got. I actually tjink Tupaea will put a bit of pressure on as a 12 too.

    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT CrusaderA Offline
    ACT Crusader
    wrote on last edited by
    #119

    @dan54 said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    @booboo said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

    @act-crusader yikes

    I suggest ALB is probably our first choice 12, and Goodhue our first choice 13 ... But not sure those who count see it that way

    I always reckon ALB is a better 13 than Goodhue, and Havili is now best 12 we got. I actually tjink Tupaea will put a bit of pressure on as a 12 too.

    Yeah I’ve always liked ALB at 13 and reckon he’s played his best test footy there.

    It was a pretty good combo (when one of them wasn’t crook) 12-Crotty 13-ALB

    1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • CrucialC Crucial

      @act-crusader sum of the parts will be the key though. Still very much a team game.

      ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT CrusaderA Offline
      ACT Crusader
      wrote on last edited by
      #120

      @crucial said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

      @act-crusader sum of the parts will be the key though. Still very much a team game.

      Yeah still some very good pieces there.

      I like the front row. A little worried about the locking pair, but Tui has experience so that’s something.

      Back row have 2 work horses and a damaging ball runner.

      9 and 10 - hold ya breath kids 😉

      The midfield could be explosive but worry about defence and communication coming together.

      Back 3 - George to score a double

      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • Daffy JaffyD Daffy Jaffy

        KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurphK Offline
        KiwiMurph
        wrote on last edited by
        #121

        @daffy-jaffy said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

        Richard Knowler's question sums up nz rugby journalism.

        Richard Knowler "Just one specialist lock on the bench in Scott Barrett, does that mean Luke Jacobson is covering the engine room?"

        Fozzie: "......."

        1 Reply Last reply
        11
        • L_n_PL L_n_P

          Although I don't like any of options, with 2 years to a RWC I don't think we should be shuffling players around now the AB's are starting to show a more coherent structure based on specialization (and competition per place). 6-7-8 and 12-13 starting to look much better.

          Havilli is a class act, but he's still bedding down at 12 - yet still offers way more potential than anyone we've seen there since Nonu. If Havilli and ALB play, leave them at 12 and 13.

          I'd treat it like RWC 2007, down to #3 or #4 first five. Who would play at 10 in 2023 if RM and BB are both injured? Risk a loss as a team learning experience now. If DMac, play DMac at 10, if Jordie play Jordie at 10, DMac at 15.

          AND if DMac at 10, tell the b_gger (when he runs) to run straight and direct until the AB's are 20 ahead. At least that way the team knows what the f*ck he's doing. If he can't do that at 10 now, imho drop him because ... he's never learning ... and there are certainly 2 better options at 15 by the RWC.

          Y Offline
          Y Offline
          Yeahtheboys
          wrote on last edited by
          #122

          @l_n_p have you guys ever watched NRL? Their playmakers (who are far better than Union playmakers imo) just about run sideways more than they run forward… if you’re fast enough and agile enough then running across field occasionally can cause a defence to bite out of the line, leaving holes. If the space is there in front of him, he takes it by running straight. If it’s not there then he tries to create something but changing running lines.

          BonesB boobooB F broughieB L_n_PL 5 Replies Last reply
          2
          • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

            @crucial said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

            @act-crusader sum of the parts will be the key though. Still very much a team game.

            Yeah still some very good pieces there.

            I like the front row. A little worried about the locking pair, but Tui has experience so that’s something.

            Back row have 2 work horses and a damaging ball runner.

            9 and 10 - hold ya breath kids 😉

            The midfield could be explosive but worry about defence and communication coming together.

            Back 3 - George to score a double

            BonesB Offline
            BonesB Offline
            Bones
            wrote on last edited by
            #123

            @act-crusader you and your optimism.

            I saw the team and thought yuck. Felt a bit sorry for the likes of Jordan and Jordie who are fighting for a spot and have to do it outside a mish-mash team.

            I expect us to win and will be livid if we lose. But if this team clicks and looks gooood, well that's fucken fantastic and I will only be left with about half a leg dangling off the Fozzy bandwagon. Ok maybe a whole leg.

            ACT CrusaderA voodooV 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • Y Yeahtheboys

              @l_n_p have you guys ever watched NRL? Their playmakers (who are far better than Union playmakers imo) just about run sideways more than they run forward… if you’re fast enough and agile enough then running across field occasionally can cause a defence to bite out of the line, leaving holes. If the space is there in front of him, he takes it by running straight. If it’s not there then he tries to create something but changing running lines.

              BonesB Offline
              BonesB Offline
              Bones
              wrote on last edited by
              #124

              @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

              who are far better than Union playmakers imo

              Can't say I see a lot of union playmakers in league. Is DC on a jolly?

              Y 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • BonesB Bones

                @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                who are far better than Union playmakers imo

                Can't say I see a lot of union playmakers in league. Is DC on a jolly?

                Y Offline
                Y Offline
                Yeahtheboys
                wrote on last edited by
                #125

                @bones huh

                BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Y Yeahtheboys

                  @bones huh

                  BonesB Offline
                  BonesB Offline
                  Bones
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #126

                  @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                  @bones huh

                  How can they possibly be better than union playmakers? They don't play union - and vice versa.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • boobooB Offline
                    boobooB Offline
                    booboo
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #127

                    @kiwimurph said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    @daffy-jaffy said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                    Richard Knowler's question sums up nz rugby journalism.

                    Richard Knowler "Just one specialist lock on the bench in Scott Barrett, does that mean Luke Jacobson is covering the engine room?"

                    Fozzie: "......."

                    Fuck me

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • Y Yeahtheboys

                      @l_n_p have you guys ever watched NRL? Their playmakers (who are far better than Union playmakers imo) just about run sideways more than they run forward… if you’re fast enough and agile enough then running across field occasionally can cause a defence to bite out of the line, leaving holes. If the space is there in front of him, he takes it by running straight. If it’s not there then he tries to create something but changing running lines.

                      boobooB Offline
                      boobooB Offline
                      booboo
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #128

                      @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                      @l_n_p have you guys ever watched NRL? Their playmakers (who are far better than Union playmakers imo) just about run sideways more than they run forward… if you’re fast enough and agile enough then running across field occasionally can cause a defence to bite out of the line, leaving holes. If the space is there in front of him, he takes it by running straight. If it’s not there then he tries to create something but changing running lines.

                      When they are playing loigue

                      BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • boobooB booboo

                        @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                        @l_n_p have you guys ever watched NRL? Their playmakers (who are far better than Union playmakers imo) just about run sideways more than they run forward… if you’re fast enough and agile enough then running across field occasionally can cause a defence to bite out of the line, leaving holes. If the space is there in front of him, he takes it by running straight. If it’s not there then he tries to create something but changing running lines.

                        When they are playing loigue

                        BonesB Offline
                        BonesB Offline
                        Bones
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #129

                        @booboo the props are way better at propping too.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        2
                        • BonesB Bones

                          @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                          I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                          KirwanK Offline
                          KirwanK Offline
                          Kirwan
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #130

                          @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                          @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                          I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                          It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                          Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                          Never said that about Akira, not once.

                          Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • KirwanK Kirwan

                            @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                            @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                            I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                            It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                            Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                            Never said that about Akira, not once.

                            Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                            BonesB Offline
                            BonesB Offline
                            Bones
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #131

                            @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                            @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                            @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                            I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                            It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                            Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                            Never said that about Akira, not once.

                            Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                            I'm all about a bad argument. I'm not so keen on selecting players who are playing poop. Until they're not playing poop that is.

                            KirwanK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • BonesB Bones

                              @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                              @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                              @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                              I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                              It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                              Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                              Never said that about Akira, not once.

                              Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                              I'm all about a bad argument. I'm not so keen on selecting players who are playing poop. Until they're not playing poop that is.

                              KirwanK Offline
                              KirwanK Offline
                              Kirwan
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #132

                              @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                              @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                              @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                              @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                              I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                              It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                              Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                              Never said that about Akira, not once.

                              Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                              I'm all about a bad argument. I'm not so keen on selecting players who are playing poop. Until they're not playing poop that is.

                              ABs commonly select players coming back from injuries, or keep them in the squad. Ofa, Patrick, Moody are just a few recent examples.

                              BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • KirwanK Offline
                                KirwanK Offline
                                Kirwan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #133

                                And as Duluth pointed out, CCS last form in 15s was pretty good.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • KirwanK Kirwan

                                  @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                                  I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                                  It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                                  Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                                  Never said that about Akira, not once.

                                  Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                                  I'm all about a bad argument. I'm not so keen on selecting players who are playing poop. Until they're not playing poop that is.

                                  ABs commonly select players coming back from injuries, or keep them in the squad. Ofa, Patrick, Moody are just a few recent examples.

                                  BonesB Offline
                                  BonesB Offline
                                  Bones
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #134

                                  @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @kirwan said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                  @chris-b Rieko drop in form? Injured. Akira drop in form? Injured. Tuipulotu drop in form? Injured.

                                  I'm sure there's a pattern but I just can't see it.

                                  It’s a sign of a bad argument when you have to make things up.

                                  Have discussed RI and CC injuries as an explanation of a drop off in form, when that factor wasn’t being considered when the copped criticism. Foster even brought up the RI calf injury last week.

                                  Never said that about Akira, not once.

                                  Patrick? Man you are reaching now.

                                  I'm all about a bad argument. I'm not so keen on selecting players who are playing poop. Until they're not playing poop that is.

                                  ABs commonly select players coming back from injuries, or keep them in the squad. Ofa, Patrick, Moody are just a few recent examples.

                                  Unless they've been overtaken by other players.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • StargazerS Offline
                                    StargazerS Offline
                                    Stargazer
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #135

                                    3bd906f1-7926-42ba-b59a-3036741fc454-image.png

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • TheMojomanT TheMojoman

                                      @nepia Sotutu is a curious case. IMO he was the or in top 3 Number 8's in Super Rugby but then got surpassed by Jacobson. Now Blackadder has leapt frogged him in the squad due to his versatility.

                                      Billy TellB Offline
                                      Billy TellB Offline
                                      Billy Tell
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #136

                                      @themojoman said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                      @nepia Sotutu is a curious case. IMO he was the or in top 3 Number 8's in Super Rugby but then got surpassed by Jacobson. Now Blackadder has leapt frogged him in the squad due to his versatility.

                                      Blackadder has leapfrogged him because he’s playing better.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • boobooB Offline
                                        boobooB Offline
                                        booboo
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #137

                                        @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                        @yeahtheboys said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                        @bones huh

                                        How can they possibly be better than union playmakers? They don't play union - and vice versa.

                                        Kinda #booboo'ed meself.

                                        Reminds me of something back in the day when TSF 'legend' Red Beard bigged up a column by loigue 'legend' Graham Lowe, whose point was basically the All Blacks props didn't do as many many hit ups as loigue props, therefore they was not as good 'footballers' as the loiguies.

                                        I do recall asking how many greens they hit in regulation, or what their free throw percentage was.

                                        They are different games.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        4
                                        • BonesB Bones

                                          @act-crusader you and your optimism.

                                          I saw the team and thought yuck. Felt a bit sorry for the likes of Jordan and Jordie who are fighting for a spot and have to do it outside a mish-mash team.

                                          I expect us to win and will be livid if we lose. But if this team clicks and looks gooood, well that's fucken fantastic and I will only be left with about half a leg dangling off the Fozzy bandwagon. Ok maybe a whole leg.

                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT Crusader
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #138

                                          @bones said in All Blacks vs Pumas II:

                                          @act-crusader you and your optimism.

                                          I saw the team and thought yuck. Felt a bit sorry for the likes of Jordan and Jordie who are fighting for a spot and have to do it outside a mish-mash team.

                                          I expect us to win and will be livid if we lose. But if this team clicks and looks gooood, well that's fucken fantastic and I will only be left with about half a leg dangling off the Fozzy bandwagon. Ok maybe a whole leg.

                                          Given this “short sharp 7 day lockdown” in Melbourne has now been going for 6 weeks, the ABs bring some optimism!

                                          Mark Ranby, Stephen Bates, Caleb Ralph, David Hill and Ben Atiga could be running out for the ABs this weekend and I’d find a positive

                                          BonesB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          7
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search