Super Rugby News
-
@KiwiMurph First Fekitoa, then Li, next Collins. Any other superstars you want us to prove the potential of?
-
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
-
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
Lions news
Swys de Bruin, current assistant coach to Johan Ackerman, has been appointed as the new head coach, taking over from Ackers next season. Also keeping the core of the players next season as well, and no his son is not joining him Gloucester.
Lions players: Warren Whiteley, Albertus Smith, Andries Coetzee, Andries Ferreira (renewed), Anthony Volminck, Aphiwe Dyantyi, Corné Fourie, Courtnall Skosan (renewed), Cyle Brink, Dillon Smit (renewed), Dylan Smith, Elton Jantjies, Francois Mostert, Harold Vorster, Howard Mnisi, Jaco Kriel, Jaco van der Walt (renewed), Jacques van Rooyen (renewed), Johannes Jonker, Justin Ackerman (renewed), Lionel Mapoe (renewed), Lourens Erasmus, Malcolm Marx (renewed), Marvin Orie, Robbie Coetzee, Rohan Janse van Rensburg, Ross Cronjé, Ruan Ackermann, Ruan Combrinck, Ruan Dreyer, Shaun Reynolds, Sithembiso Sithole, Sylvian Mahuza (renewed).
And on that note....C'mon CANES!!!!
-
The Hurricanes have moved swiftly to future-proof their championship-winning team by retaining four leading players.
They include new All Blacks Ngani Laumape, signed for two more seasons, and Vaea Fifita, who has committed through to 2020.
Laumape and Fifita join midfielder Matt Proctor and lock Geoff Cridge in inking new deals.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=11889655
-
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
@Bovidae That's quite a significant change - messes up my plan that the Crusaders could finish top and might only have to face teams travelling from South Africa.
The plus side right now is that if we finish second, although we'd have to play the Highlanders - if we managed to get past them we'd get a team travelling from SA for the semi - whereas finish first we should get the Sharks, but then a team travelling only a few hours from Canberra for the semi.
-
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
@Bovidae said in Super Rugby News:
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
Both the Sanzaar website and the final version of the 2017 Super Rugby Media Guide (March 2017) say this:
-
@Bovidae said in Super Rugby News:
There has been a tweak in the playoff format, which has problems too.
For the NZ teams, finishing 3rd in the NZC maybe an advantage over 2nd as although this would mean a trip to SA your reward is a home SF if you win that game and the overall no.2 seed also loses.
Both the Sanzaar website and the final version of the 2017 Super Rugby Media Guide (March 2017) say this:
@Stargazer Yeah - that's exactly what that article describes.
-
@Stargazer Yeah - that's exactly what that article describes.
-
@Stargazer Yeah - that's exactly what that article describes.
-
@Kruse Yes, that's why I wonder why the article suggests that this has gone largely unnoticed. Info was easily available, especially to the media.
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:
@Kruse Yes, that's why I wonder why the article suggests that this has gone largely unnoticed. Info was easily available, especially to the media.
Ah sorry - I misunderstood, thinking you'd misunderstood.
So... you were thinking "the media" are competent - and that's where the misunderstanding actually was? -
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby News:
@Kruse Yes, that's why I wonder why the article suggests that this has gone largely unnoticed. Info was easily available, especially to the media.
Ah sorry - I misunderstood, thinking you'd misunderstood.
So... you were thinking "the media" are competent - and that's where the misunderstanding actually was? -
@Kruse Haha, yes, I'm naively hoping that there may still be some good sports journos out there. Silly me! :person_facepalming_tone3:
-
@Stargazer You have to wonder if the only reason it's being reported on now was that SANZAAR "prompted" them to do so, as it's long past time people were warned.
@Kruse said in Super Rugby News:
@Stargazer You have to wonder if the only reason it's being reported on now was that SANZAAR "prompted" them to do so, as it's long past time people were warned.
I see the jaapies noticed back in January.
And the aussies - well, it's irrelevant to them really, isn't it? -
So with all teams now even on games played (14) the situation is
-
Crusaders 63 (v Hurricanes / 68-63 / 1 or 2 )
-
Lions 61 (v Sharks / 65-61 / 1 or 2 )
-
Stormers 39 (v Bulls / 44-39 / 3 )
-
Brumbies 34 (v Chiefs / 39-34 / 4 )
-
Hurricanes 54 (v Crusaders / 59-54 / 5 or 6)
-
Chiefs 53 (v Brumbies / 58-53 / 5 or 6)
-
Highlanders 46 (v Reds / 51-46 / 7 or 8 )
-
Sharks 42 (v Lions / 47-42 / 7 or 8 )
So (my guesses at end)
Q1: Crusaders OR Lions V Highlanders OR Sharks (Crusaders v Sharks)
Q2: Crusaders OR Lions V Highlanders OR Sharks (Lions v Highlanders)
Q3: Stormers V Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Stormers vChiefsCanes)
Q4: Brumbies V Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Brumbies vHurricanesChiefs)S1: Crusaders OR Lions OR Highlanders OR Sharks V Brumbies OR Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Crusaders v
HurricanesChiefs)
S2: Crusaders OR Lions OR Highlanders OR Sharks V Stormers OR Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Lions vChiefsCanes) -
-
So with all teams now even on games played (14) the situation is
-
Crusaders 63 (v Hurricanes / 68-63 / 1 or 2 )
-
Lions 61 (v Sharks / 65-61 / 1 or 2 )
-
Stormers 39 (v Bulls / 44-39 / 3 )
-
Brumbies 34 (v Chiefs / 39-34 / 4 )
-
Hurricanes 54 (v Crusaders / 59-54 / 5 or 6)
-
Chiefs 53 (v Brumbies / 58-53 / 5 or 6)
-
Highlanders 46 (v Reds / 51-46 / 7 or 8 )
-
Sharks 42 (v Lions / 47-42 / 7 or 8 )
So (my guesses at end)
Q1: Crusaders OR Lions V Highlanders OR Sharks (Crusaders v Sharks)
Q2: Crusaders OR Lions V Highlanders OR Sharks (Lions v Highlanders)
Q3: Stormers V Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Stormers vChiefsCanes)
Q4: Brumbies V Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Brumbies vHurricanesChiefs)S1: Crusaders OR Lions OR Highlanders OR Sharks V Brumbies OR Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Crusaders v
HurricanesChiefs)
S2: Crusaders OR Lions OR Highlanders OR Sharks V Stormers OR Hurricanes OR Chiefs (Lions vChiefsCanes) -
-
@Crucial If I read that right - you're picking the Chiefs to lose to the Brumbies this weekend?
-
@Crucial If I read that right - you're picking the Chiefs to lose to the Brumbies this weekend?
