NZ v Australia Test #2
-
50 from 39 balls for Corey.
-
Um what the fuck? I go out we're 3 for nothing off a thousand. I come home and this has happened? Cricket gods love them some Baz
-
There's some agricultural shit being played out there
-
This session so far: 1 wicket, 164 runs from 17 overs at 9.25 an over.<br><br>
Aaahhhh WTF! -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="No Quarter" data-cid="559698" data-time="1455928032"><p>Anderson belts a 6. Time for these two to counter punch our way up to 300 ;)</p></blockquote>
I was in no way serious when I made this comment.... -
<p>Cricket is a fucking funny game sometimes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the first test we cried that NZ batsmen didn't respect their wickets, weren't patient enough, played at too many balls they should have left.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Williamson, Latham and Nicholls obviously take note of this, and try and grind through a tough period. They play the classical, gritty innings that we were all craving in the first test, and all lose their wickets to decent balls and great catches on a seaming deck.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then McCullum comes in and throws all of this out the window, swinging like a dunny door. Gets a few lucky edges, catch off a no-ball and he's away. Against all advice or technique, he has gone a long way to winning the game for the Black Caps.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Poor old Kane would be spewing.</p>
<p>.</p> -
Baz goes for 145 from 79 balls.<br><br>
Special innings. -
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="barbarian" data-cid="559734" data-time="1455932482">
<div>
<p>Cricket is a fucking funny game sometimes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In the first test we cried that NZ batsmen didn't respect their wickets, weren't patient enough, played at too many balls they should have left.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Williamson, Latham and Nicholls obviously take note of this, and try and grind through a tough period. They play the classical, gritty innings that we were all craving in the first test, and all lose their wickets to decent balls and great catches on a seaming deck.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Then McCullum comes in and throws all of this out the window, swinging like a dunny door. Gets a few lucky edges, catch off a no-ball and he's away. Against all advice or technique, he has gone a long way to winning the game for the Black Caps.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Poor old Kane would be spewing.</p>
<p>.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>McCullum played that fantastic innings because that is the only way he can play. He could have been out 2nd ball or the ball before lunch or the no-ball. He wasn't out and he took advantage. If McCullum had tried to grind it wouldn't have worked because McCullum doesn't have a defensive game anymore. Williamson and Latham are both proper cricketers who should be aiming to build innings because they have the techniques to do it. If Kane went for a golden duck then McCullum comes out earlier when the ball is doing more and maybe gets a duck himself.</p> -
Anderson not smart
-
<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="hydro11" data-cid="559739" data-time="1455933761">
</p>
<div>
<p>McCullum played that fantastic innings because that is the only way he can play. He could have been out 2nd ball or the ball before lunch or the no-ball. He wasn't out and he took advantage. If McCullum had tried to grind it wouldn't have worked because McCullum doesn't have a defensive game anymore. Williamson and Latham are both proper cricketers who should be aiming to build innings because they have the techniques to do it. If Kane went for a golden duck then McCullum comes out earlier when the ball is doing more and maybe gets a duck himself.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>That's the trick, talk about what he <em>didn't </em>do</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>
