Super Rugby 2023
-
Good news.
I would think the new rules would be things like time off/time limits at scrumtime etc
at very least you would hope this kind of certainty will make sponsors happy and easier to find as well as new broadcast deal
-
at very least you would hope this kind of certainty will make sponsors happy and easier to find as well as new broadcast deal
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:
at very least you would hope this kind of certainty will make sponsors happy and easier to find as well as new broadcast deal
Thank god that's over. always thought it would sort itself out regardless of Hamish Mclennans yapping.
-
This post is deleted!
-
Good news.
I would think the new rules would be things like time off/time limits at scrumtime etc
@KiwiMurph said in Super Rugby 2023:
Good news.
I would think the new rules would be things like time off/time limits at scrumtime etc
That Im ok with, but I think most rules should fall in line with International rules as it looked liked we failed to adjust early in our AB campaign this year
-
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.
This is interesting:
The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.
However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.
“RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).
I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.
@Chris said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.
This is interesting:
The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.
However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.
“RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).
I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.
Good lord. That's marketing creatives personified, completely detached from the sport. Far out
-
@Chris said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.
This is interesting:
The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.
However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.
“RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).
I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.
Good lord. That's marketing creatives personified, completely detached from the sport. Far out
@nzzp said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Chris said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Stargazer said in Super Rugby 2023:
@Kiwiwomble It was clear from the start that McLennan's threats to leave the comp was just a load of hot air. Not surprised the comp will continue.
This is interesting:
The confirmation of the current Super Rugby Pacific format – with the eight-team finals format – will disappoint some fans and will be seen as a win for Australia, which has generally struggled with player depth.
However, Marinos said there would be rule changes in Super Rugby Pacific to make the game more appealing.
“RA and NZ Rugby are committed to the development of the most exciting form of rugby in the world, through trialling and implementing new rules, new ways of engaging fans and broadcast innovations with our partners,” he said in a statement.Hopefully, those rule changes do not include the same stupid "sin-bin power-play" rule that the RFU is proposing for the new Premiership and Championship Cup competition (or similar nonsense).
I really hope it is not what they are alluding to,What a stupid idea that is.
Good lord. That's marketing creatives personified, completely detached from the sport. Far out
yep bat shit crazy idea.
-
i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double
-
i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:
i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double
I hope not,I don't like this either.
-
i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double
@Kiwiwomble said in Super Rugby 2023:
i'll say it now, i fully expect to see a "max zone", under the posts maybe, where tries are worth double
They could try reducing how long a team can be in possession and up the power play sin bin to two players. Also make a try worth one less point in the power play.
-
@Bones maybe asking to swap a player at half time would work too.
I mean then teams could get real tactical and pick someone shit, then at halftime give him to the opposition.
-
I reckon a 3 second rule. Ball must be played in the open after every 3 seconds.
3 to complete a scrum, 3 to complete a ruck/tackle, 3 to complete a maul etc -
https://www.instagram.com/p/ClpafXdvQRP/
Congratulations to our QBE North Harbour men who have stepped in to provide Super Rugby cover for the summer!
Blues
@jed_melvin
@kadebanks
@tamaraumcgahanChiefs
@wallacesititi -
I'd be interested to know who else is with the Chiefs as there are plenty of options at loose forward without having to look outside the area.
@Bovidae said in Super Rugby 2023:
I'd be interested to know who else is with the Chiefs as there are plenty of options at loose forward without having to look outside the area.
Yep, staggered by that. Who misses out from McCurran, Lasaqa, Norris, Brash, Burr and Reuben?
