Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

The Current State of Rugby

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.5k Posts 90 Posters 173.6k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

    It's a scrum

    We need that guy

    I'm on the lineout spot. But if you move me it will injure me further

    No chance a ref can police

    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodeanA Offline
    antipodean
    wrote on last edited by
    #592

    @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

    It's a scrum

    We need that guy

    I'm on the lineout spot. But if you move me it will injure me further

    No chance a ref can police

    I think the solution is to remove the ability to game the referee. Prop or lock is suddenly injured during a break in play so can't compete at the set piece? Either replace him or free kick awarded to the opposition. You've magically chosen this spot to complain about a niggle? Free kick to the opposition.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • taniwharugbyT taniwharugby

      @Crucial well it clearly isnt that simple when you get different refs ruling it differently...therefore my reasoning for taking them needing to interpret what they saw from the equation.

      CrucialC Offline
      CrucialC Offline
      Crucial
      wrote on last edited by
      #593

      @taniwharugby said in The Current State of Rugby:

      @Crucial well it clearly isnt that simple when you get different refs ruling it differently...therefore my reasoning for taking them needing to interpret what they saw from the equation.

      We are probably arguing semantics but to me the law is very simple. It just isn't applied in a simple manner.

      "A player must not intentionally knock the ball forward with hand or arm. Sanction: Penalty.
      It is not an intentional knock-on if, in the act of trying to catch the ball, the player knocks on provided that there was a reasonable expectation that the player could gain possession."

      KiwiwombleK 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • CrucialC Crucial

        @taniwharugby said in The Current State of Rugby:

        @Crucial well it clearly isnt that simple when you get different refs ruling it differently...therefore my reasoning for taking them needing to interpret what they saw from the equation.

        We are probably arguing semantics but to me the law is very simple. It just isn't applied in a simple manner.

        "A player must not intentionally knock the ball forward with hand or arm. Sanction: Penalty.
        It is not an intentional knock-on if, in the act of trying to catch the ball, the player knocks on provided that there was a reasonable expectation that the player could gain possession."

        KiwiwombleK Offline
        KiwiwombleK Offline
        Kiwiwomble
        wrote on last edited by Kiwiwomble
        #594

        @Crucial my issue with that is the use of "intentional" and "reasonable"...both are subjective

        personally i think laws should be black and white, regather?...all good...dont?...i would just have a scrum as the knock on rule but i know others think it should be punished with a penalty

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • antipodeanA Offline
          antipodeanA Offline
          antipodean
          wrote on last edited by
          #595

          The simple issue is no one will ever be happy with the rule however you amend and apply it. Thought he could get the intercept and hence think a penalty is ridiculous for a failed catch, versus clearly deliberate act preventing a certain try only results in a free kick...

          Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Dan54D Offline
            Dan54D Offline
            Dan54
            wrote on last edited by
            #596

            I know we can get frustrated with laws that are not seemingly black and white and the way they are interpreted, but personally I actually find it one of the things I have always loved about game, ball knocked on, play advantage, same as penalty etc. I don't get too upset if different refs have a bit different ways of looking at it, as long as they consistent during the game as they ref it.
            I understand where some find it frustrating, but I prefer a fluid game, and not too quick to blow whistle at every little thing.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

              It's a scrum

              We need that guy

              I'm on the lineout spot. But if you move me it will injure me further

              No chance a ref can police

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Machpants
              wrote on last edited by
              #597

              @mariner4life said in The Current State of Rugby:

              It's a scrum

              We need that guy

              I'm on the lineout spot. But if you move me it will injure me further

              No chance a ref can police

              If he's not available scrum is a free kick to opposition, second time it happens penalty

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Steve

                @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @ARHS said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                Gerhard Van der Heever on the bench. For crying out loud. How sterile. How fake. What has the game become. Do the ends just justify the means for everyone now?

                Yeah he has only lived in Japan for six years. What gives there?

                Couldn't give a fiddlers how long he lived there. I live in Spain. Im not fucking Spanish.

                But you’re an amateur Spaniard

                Id be their starting 10 judging by the standard.

                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT CrusaderA Offline
                ACT Crusader
                wrote on last edited by
                #598

                @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @ARHS said in The Current State of Rugby:

                @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                Gerhard Van der Heever on the bench. For crying out loud. How sterile. How fake. What has the game become. Do the ends just justify the means for everyone now?

                Yeah he has only lived in Japan for six years. What gives there?

                Couldn't give a fiddlers how long he lived there. I live in Spain. Im not fucking Spanish.

                But you’re an amateur Spaniard

                Id be their starting 10 judging by the standard.

                “It’s always been my dream to play for Spain”

                Victor MeldrewV 1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • ACT CrusaderA ACT Crusader

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @ARHS said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  Gerhard Van der Heever on the bench. For crying out loud. How sterile. How fake. What has the game become. Do the ends just justify the means for everyone now?

                  Yeah he has only lived in Japan for six years. What gives there?

                  Couldn't give a fiddlers how long he lived there. I live in Spain. Im not fucking Spanish.

                  But you’re an amateur Spaniard

                  Id be their starting 10 judging by the standard.

                  “It’s always been my dream to play for Spain”

                  Victor MeldrewV Offline
                  Victor MeldrewV Offline
                  Victor Meldrew
                  wrote on last edited by Victor Meldrew
                  #599

                  @ACT-Crusader said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @MiketheSnow said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @ARHS said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                  Gerhard Van der Heever on the bench. For crying out loud. How sterile. How fake. What has the game become. Do the ends just justify the means for everyone now?

                  Yeah he has only lived in Japan for six years. What gives there?

                  Couldn't give a fiddlers how long he lived there. I live in Spain. Im not fucking Spanish.

                  But you’re an amateur Spaniard

                  Id be their starting 10 judging by the standard.

                  “It’s always been my dream to play for Spain”

                  "Soy tan español como las tapas y el rioja"

                  Slightly OT, but couldn't help thinking of Brad Shields and @Steve....

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaioT Offline
                    TeWaio
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #600

                    Could simplify the intercept thing even more and make any deflection of a pass by opposition totally fine, regardless of intent. Want to avoid deliberate knock downs etc? Throw better passes the opposition can't reach. Same as basketball/netball.

                    mariner4lifeM Dan54D 2 Replies Last reply
                    5
                    • TeWaioT TeWaio

                      Could simplify the intercept thing even more and make any deflection of a pass by opposition totally fine, regardless of intent. Want to avoid deliberate knock downs etc? Throw better passes the opposition can't reach. Same as basketball/netball.

                      mariner4lifeM Online
                      mariner4lifeM Online
                      mariner4life
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #601

                      @TeWaio I watch a lot of NRL. An overlap gets blown by the defender slapping the ball? Everyone shrugs and moves on. It's a dumb ass interpretation brought about because scoring in rugby is hard enough apparently. And rugby players are shithouse at basics like draw and pass.

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      5
                      • antipodeanA antipodean

                        The simple issue is no one will ever be happy with the rule however you amend and apply it. Thought he could get the intercept and hence think a penalty is ridiculous for a failed catch, versus clearly deliberate act preventing a certain try only results in a free kick...

                        Victor MeldrewV Offline
                        Victor MeldrewV Offline
                        Victor Meldrew
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #602

                        @antipodean said in The Current State of Rugby:

                        The simple issue is no one will ever be happy with the rule however you amend and apply it

                        Yep. It can't be fixed 100% but I think it can be improved and be made more consistent because at the moment it's a bit of a lottery.

                        We have a protocol/flowchart for dangerous play, so perhaps something similar might help? Hand on top of ball is deliberate = card, Hand on bottom or end of ball and no upward movement = penalty, Hand on bottom of ball and ball goes up = knock-on.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • S Steve

                          @MN5 said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          This is the Rugby I used to enjoy. Jeopardy on both sides. Either team could have scored in this passage. Forwards were strong, backs were fast. When the ball went wide it was on.

                          Notice how not one player or commentator complained when Marty Holah arrowed Dawson into the turf like a sack of garbage.

                          Good times.

                          Holah would be red carded today no question.

                          I think the most amazing thing of all is Mike Tindalls flowing tresses on display.

                          Post O'Driscoll and Alastair Campbell we shat the bed with foul play. I was upended like that many times in my playing days and never once complained. I was fond of dishing out the odd dump/spear tackle myself too.

                          BonesB Online
                          BonesB Online
                          Bones
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #603

                          @Steve said in The Current State of Rugby:

                          I was upended like that many times in my playing days

                          This does help clarify things.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          7
                          • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

                            @TeWaio I watch a lot of NRL. An overlap gets blown by the defender slapping the ball? Everyone shrugs and moves on. It's a dumb ass interpretation brought about because scoring in rugby is hard enough apparently. And rugby players are shithouse at basics like draw and pass.

                            M Offline
                            M Offline
                            muddyriver
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #604

                            @mariner4life 6 again is massive in league though.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • TeWaioT TeWaio

                              Could simplify the intercept thing even more and make any deflection of a pass by opposition totally fine, regardless of intent. Want to avoid deliberate knock downs etc? Throw better passes the opposition can't reach. Same as basketball/netball.

                              Dan54D Offline
                              Dan54D Offline
                              Dan54
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #605

                              @TeWaio said in The Current State of Rugby:

                              Could simplify the intercept thing even more and make any deflection of a pass by opposition totally fine, regardless of intent. Want to avoid deliberate knock downs etc? Throw better passes the opposition can't reach. Same as basketball/netball.

                              Yep TW the trouble is in Netball and basketball it not illegal to throw the ball forward, don't forget it meant to be a penalty if you throw ball forward in rugby, the whole tenet of rugby is that the ball has to be passed backwards.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • TimT Away
                                TimT Away
                                Tim
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #606

                                https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/reduced-tackle-height-revealed-for-1st-xv-rugby-and-club-rugby/ENTFXQZ3MZD2PB3INFN2MH3TKE/

                                antipodeanA taniwharugbyT 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • TimT Tim

                                  https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/reduced-tackle-height-revealed-for-1st-xv-rugby-and-club-rugby/ENTFXQZ3MZD2PB3INFN2MH3TKE/

                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodeanA Offline
                                  antipodean
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #607

                                  @Tim given all the things refs get wrong, they're now asked to determine where the sternum is. whoever came up with this idea is a retard.

                                  CrucialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • antipodeanA antipodean

                                    @Tim given all the things refs get wrong, they're now asked to determine where the sternum is. whoever came up with this idea is a retard.

                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    CrucialC Offline
                                    Crucial
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #608

                                    @antipodean said in The Current State of Rugby:

                                    @Tim given all the things refs get wrong, they're now asked to determine where the sternum is. whoever came up with this idea is a retard.

                                    Hits to the chest and above are pretty easy to spot from looking at the tackled player reactions.

                                    It certainly is a strange way to mitigate problems though. By preparing players in an environment of a completely different nature to the top levels.
                                    IMO this will cement the early identification and separation of players into categories to play two very different games.
                                    Will be even more obvious in the womens game where top players still play club.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • DonsteppaD Offline
                                      DonsteppaD Offline
                                      Donsteppa
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #609

                                      While I get the intent of what they're trying to do, I imagine it won't help the cause of recruiting more referees...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • TimT Tim

                                        https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/reduced-tackle-height-revealed-for-1st-xv-rugby-and-club-rugby/ENTFXQZ3MZD2PB3INFN2MH3TKE/

                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugbyT Offline
                                        taniwharugby
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #610

                                        @Tim pretty sure NH 1st 15 comp did something similar this year, was a free kick for any tackle sternum to shoulder line...I watched a few 1st games and couldnt work out what all the free kicks were for at tackle time, and based on a conversation I had with a parent, I think it depended on if it was a NH or Northland ref too, which musta sucked for the kids playing the same comp...

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • TimT Away
                                          TimT Away
                                          Tim
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #611

                                          I've seen the idea of high vis stripes across jerseys to help refs judge tackle height.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search