Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
-
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
-
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
Don’t forget Dazza.
-
@Donsteppa probably best to go back to boult now though
@bayimports said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Donsteppa probably best to go back to boult now though
upvoting myself, Maxi is Boults bunny, should have been done sooner
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Great stuff, Guppy!
That drop of Neesh's could have been very costly, but his ass is saved!
I'd be bowling Boult, Henry and Southee for the next half dozen overs to get at least one more.
If that means Santner and Bracewell have to bowl three late, that's a risk we have to take.
Don’t forget Dazza.
-
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
-
On your bike, Steve!
Pile in Little Kane - no point at all in holding back your best bowlers.
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
-
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Your best bowler is Boult.
You bowl him out now. No question!
When he's bowling well he is our bowler, surely?
-
Wow.
Dumb by Zampa. Gets out to Boult's last ball, when we've largely got Santner and Neesh left!
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Wow.
Dumb by Zampa. Gets out to Boult's last ball, when we've largely got Santner and Neesh left!
Don’t worry Bracewell is there to assist (the batsmen) too
-
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
@MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
Not even close…
-
@MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
Not even close…
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
@Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
Got 'eem!
That was what we needed.
Now the plan has to be to bowl them out for less than 160.
Pile in Little Kane.
You’ve gotta love the Aussie commentators talking up 220-230 from where they are.
Seems possible to me ...
Not even close…
looked so likely for so long. Aus are ridiculous like that
-
13 run final over is actually criminal on a slow as pitch that the batsmen have been getting hardly anything from
@ACT-Crusader said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0:
13 run final over is actually criminal on a slow as pitch that the batsmen have been getting hardly anything from
Last couple of overs were piss poor and no idea why Bracewell got the 2nd to last and not Mitch or Satnav. Should never be someone a bit shit that the batsman have had a sighter at!
Comms are saying there was a plumb lbw that would have saved 30 runs, but it looked like there was a big inside edge spike on snicko to me -but I need to see that again.
