Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
381 Posts 29 Posters 18.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4lifeM Offline
    mariner4life
    wrote on last edited by
    #372

    our bowling just looked, Boult aside, so pedestrian.

    Ferguson is genuinely quick, but seems to bowl back of a length at off stump, and fuck all else. Smith, marnus and Carey looked untroubled. And they got the run rate from "dead" to respectable with seemingly little effort. Then Green and Maxwell smacked them to a score that was always going to be difficult.

    Allen and Conway actually started pretty well and looked positive. And then it fell in a hole. And the game ground to a halt as Kane especially, and latham and Mitchell just seemed unable to get it off the square. And then to make it worse they all got out.

    That's 3 very average performances from everyone not named Trent Boult.

    1 Reply Last reply
    3
    • Chris B.C Chris B.

      Stoinis, Finch, Davey, Maxwell and Marnus no great shakes for the Aussies. Unfortunately, Carey, Green and Smith came to the party when required.

      All of their bowlers pretty decent.

      mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4lifeM Offline
      mariner4life
      wrote on last edited by
      #373

      @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

      Stoinis, Finch, Davey, Maxwell and Marnus no great shakes for the Aussies. Unfortunately, Carey, Green and Smith came to the party when required.

      All of their bowlers pretty decent.

      I watched Carey bat twice and he looked very fucking good both times.

      Abbott was very impressive as well.

      Chris B.C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mariner4lifeM mariner4life

        @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

        Stoinis, Finch, Davey, Maxwell and Marnus no great shakes for the Aussies. Unfortunately, Carey, Green and Smith came to the party when required.

        All of their bowlers pretty decent.

        I watched Carey bat twice and he looked very fucking good both times.

        Abbott was very impressive as well.

        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.C Offline
        Chris B.
        wrote on last edited by Chris B.
        #374

        @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

        Abbott was very impressive as well.

        Very Australian. Out rolls a newbie bowler who instantly looks like a worldbeater.

        mariner4lifeM 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • Chris B.C Chris B.

          @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

          Abbott was very impressive as well.

          Very Australian. Out rolls a newbie bowler who instantly looks like a worldbeater.

          mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4lifeM Offline
          mariner4life
          wrote on last edited by
          #375

          @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

          @mariner4life said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

          Abbott was very impressive as well.

          Very Australian. Out rolls a newbie bowler who instantly looks like a worldbeater.

          they construct them in a factory like South Africa constructs big locks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          3
          • Chris B.C Chris B.

            https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=14905;team=5;type=series

            Boult was excellent. Henry was good.

            The rest of the bowlers just not penetrative enough. Reminded me a bit of the days when we'd have Gav and Harry bowling in tandem - restricting runs but not looking like taking wickets.

            the batting - well, Phillips nearly won the last one for us - if Abbot steps on the rope I think we need 33 from 24 and can pretty much just knock it around - though the ineptitude displayed by Lockie and Timmy means we couldn't afford to lose a wicket.

            This series looks like the beginning of the end for Guppy. 36th birthday coming up and that was pretty much a dropping for the 3rd match.

            Somehow, we need to adjust the balance of the team to include more specialists and fewer half-baked allrounders.

            Not sure whether Little Kane has been worked out with all the IPL etc being played, or he's just not able to get the miles in with his elbow, but he's not the player he was. Teams finding it too easy to tie him up and tie him down.

            MN5M Offline
            MN5M Offline
            MN5
            wrote on last edited by
            #376

            @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

            https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=14905;team=5;type=series

            Boult was excellent. Henry was good.

            The rest of the bowlers just not penetrative enough. Reminded me a bit of the days when we'd have Gav and Harry bowling in tandem - restricting runs but not looking like taking wickets.

            the batting - well, Phillips nearly won the last one for us - if Abbot steps on the rope I think we need 33 from 24 and can pretty much just knock it around - though the ineptitude displayed by Lockie and Timmy means we couldn't afford to lose a wicket.

            This series looks like the beginning of the end for Guppy. 36th birthday coming up and that was pretty much a dropping for the 3rd match.

            Somehow, we need to adjust the balance of the team to include more specialists and fewer half-baked allrounders.

            Not sure whether Little Kane has been worked out with all the IPL etc being played, or he's just not able to get the miles in with his elbow, but he's not the player he was. Teams finding it too easy to tie him up and tie him down.

            No one does a bits and pieces all rounder quite like NZ. At least we seem to have jettisoned them from the test team but the ODI side is often chocka with them.

            A “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

            NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • MN5M MN5

              @Chris-B said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

              https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/averages/batting_bowling_by_team.html?id=14905;team=5;type=series

              Boult was excellent. Henry was good.

              The rest of the bowlers just not penetrative enough. Reminded me a bit of the days when we'd have Gav and Harry bowling in tandem - restricting runs but not looking like taking wickets.

              the batting - well, Phillips nearly won the last one for us - if Abbot steps on the rope I think we need 33 from 24 and can pretty much just knock it around - though the ineptitude displayed by Lockie and Timmy means we couldn't afford to lose a wicket.

              This series looks like the beginning of the end for Guppy. 36th birthday coming up and that was pretty much a dropping for the 3rd match.

              Somehow, we need to adjust the balance of the team to include more specialists and fewer half-baked allrounders.

              Not sure whether Little Kane has been worked out with all the IPL etc being played, or he's just not able to get the miles in with his elbow, but he's not the player he was. Teams finding it too easy to tie him up and tie him down.

              No one does a bits and pieces all rounder quite like NZ. At least we seem to have jettisoned them from the test team but the ODI side is often chocka with them.

              A “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

              NTAN Offline
              NTAN Offline
              NTA
              wrote on last edited by
              #377

              @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

              “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

              After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

              MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • NTAN NTA

                @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

                After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

                MN5M Offline
                MN5M Offline
                MN5
                wrote on last edited by
                #378

                @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

                After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

                Well the fuck you bloody crowd like pointing out that Kapil Devs fielding on top of his other attributes made him far superior to Paddles, Imran and Beefy out of the four all rounders in the 80s.

                nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • MN5M MN5

                  @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                  @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                  “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

                  After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

                  Well the fuck you bloody crowd like pointing out that Kapil Devs fielding on top of his other attributes made him far superior to Paddles, Imran and Beefy out of the four all rounders in the 80s.

                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamusN Offline
                  nostrildamus
                  Banned
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #379

                  @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                  @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                  @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                  “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

                  After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

                  Well the fuck you bloody crowd like pointing out that Kapil Devs fielding on top of his other attributes made him far superior to Paddles, Imran and Beefy out of the four all rounders in the 80s.

                  Beefy was pretty decent in the slips, I recall?

                  https://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/5-best-england-slip-catchers-of-all-time/2

                  nostrildamusN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                    @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                    @NTA said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                    @MN5 said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                    “part rounder” as someone on here once wrote.

                    After that catch in the deep, Guppy is in "specialist fielder" territory

                    Well the fuck you bloody crowd like pointing out that Kapil Devs fielding on top of his other attributes made him far superior to Paddles, Imran and Beefy out of the four all rounders in the 80s.

                    Beefy was pretty decent in the slips, I recall?

                    https://www.sportskeeda.com/cricket/5-best-england-slip-catchers-of-all-time/2

                    nostrildamusN Offline
                    nostrildamusN Offline
                    nostrildamus
                    Banned
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #380

                    nb I didn't know his childhood nickname was "Bungalow"-that's a good one!

                    https://www.crictracker.com/14-facts-ian-botham/

                    MN5M 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • nostrildamusN nostrildamus

                      nb I didn't know his childhood nickname was "Bungalow"-that's a good one!

                      https://www.crictracker.com/14-facts-ian-botham/

                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5M Offline
                      MN5
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #381

                      @nostrildamus said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber:

                      nb I didn't know his childhood nickname was "Bungalow"-that's a good one!

                      https://www.crictracker.com/14-facts-ian-botham/

                      Love Beefy. An absolute legend.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Search
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Search