Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0 + 2.0 + dead rubber
-
@KiwiMurph said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
3 overs of Bracewell might be enough
Yep, to be fair I'd be bowling Neesham at this stage instead of a second spinner, but Bracewell's still not a bad selection

And Lochie nearly gets an inside edge onto the stumps, that instead scuttles away for four.

-
Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.
-
Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.
@MajorRage said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
Completely not joking I still have Oz as favourites heres. And have just bet accordingly.
I've upvoted for agreement ... but booooo
-
We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack
-
We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack
@No-Quarter said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
We've waited far too long to give Boult another crack
Kane's tactics have been poor. Did he forget we are defending a low score? At last Boult is back into the attack and almost gets a wicket first ball
-
Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.
@Donsteppa said in Hadlee-Chappell ODI 1.0:
Hard to blame too much on Kane’s bowling choices, given only his opening bowlers have fronted with the ball tonight.
He didn't bowl them long enough. He's wasted the juicyness of the ball on the spinners