Bledisloe 2

[Mackerzzzz]

Who's hand even is that

[taniwharugby]

@Anonymous I can understand why SW thought he scored it, but you can't give that, surely

[Toddy]

That's some go-go gadget shit if he's scored that

[gt12]

I wouldn’t give that.

[Mackerzzzz]

That's bells hand isn't it?

[canefan]

@Toddy said in Bledisloe 2:

That's some go-go gadget shit if he's scored that

Amazing control and no aussie there to strip it out

[nostrildamus]

wow that will be contentious.

[broughie]

Looks to me that the Ozzie hand was keeping the ball in contact with Whitelocks hand and that should be a try. Fricken excellent.

[African Monkey]

@gt12 Pretty hard to overturn at the same time.

[gt12]

@gt12 said in Bledisloe 2:

I wouldn’t give that.

My Jinx is still working!

[Stargazer]

No clear separation. Should be a try.

[Nepia]

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

[Chris]

That is remarkable by Whitelock .

[nostrildamus]

I was just going to say BBBR was more visible than Sam in general play!

[canefan]

@nostrildamus said in Bledisloe 2:

wow that will be contentious.

At least Richie was made to wait before the conversion was taken.....

[ACT Crusader]

Whitelock with a Spider-Man effort

[Chris]

@Nepia said in Bledisloe 2:

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

One hand was Whitelocks.

[bayimports]

@Nepia said in Bledisloe 2:

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

his taped hand stayed on the side

[taniwharugby]

So that's on the refs initial call really...

[canefan]

@Nepia said in Bledisloe 2:

I'm confused, how did Whitelock still have control of that? I could only see two Oz hands.

One hand was Whitelock's