Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

India v Aus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
cricket
204 Posts 24 Posters 6.8k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurphK Offline
    KiwiMurph
    wrote on last edited by
    #73

    India in trouble here.

    Lyon bowling brilliantly

    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • antipodeanA antipodean

      Warner now has the lowest average of any opener to have batted at least 15 times in India

      NTAN Offline
      NTAN Offline
      NTA
      wrote on last edited by
      #74

      @antipodean said in India v Aus:

      Warner now has the lowest average of any opener to have batted at least 15 times in India

      And a hairline fracture in his arm and concussion

      https://twitter.com/plalor/status/1626813030028967937?t=5otx59pvd5HDKVyQAgjULA&s=19

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Crazy HorseC Offline
        Crazy HorseC Offline
        Crazy Horse
        wrote on last edited by
        #75

        We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.

        NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Crazy HorseC Crazy Horse

          We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.

          NTAN Offline
          NTAN Offline
          NTA
          wrote on last edited by
          #76

          @Crazy-Horse said in India v Aus:

          We have just seen an umpire review for a stumping where the Aussies also appeared to appeal for a caught behind which was turned down. Part of the review process was to look at the front view to see if there was an edge. In effect, the Aussies just got a free review for the edge. Unless there is something that has escaped me, I cannot see any reason why the front view is necessary for a stumping.

          I agree that the front view is not required for a stumping.

          I think it is one of those weird cricket things where you don't have to state what the appeal or review is for - the umpires just go through every option

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

            India in trouble here.

            Lyon bowling brilliantly

            NTAN Offline
            NTAN Offline
            NTA
            wrote on last edited by
            #77

            @KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:

            India in trouble here.

            Lyon bowling brilliantly

            And then their tail remembers how to bat. Hilarious.

            1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • NTAN Offline
              NTAN Offline
              NTA
              wrote on last edited by
              #78

              6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...

              KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • NTAN NTA

                6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...

                KiwiMurphK Offline
                KiwiMurphK Offline
                KiwiMurph
                wrote on last edited by
                #79

                @NTA said in India v Aus:

                6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...

                Spoke too soon on the innings lead

                NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                  @NTA said in India v Aus:

                  6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...

                  Spoke too soon on the innings lead

                  NTAN Offline
                  NTAN Offline
                  NTA
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #80

                  @KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:

                  @NTA said in India v Aus:

                  6 down for -95 and suddenly they're going to take a first innings lead. FFS...

                  Spoke too soon on the innings lead

                  1 run.

                  alt text

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • KiwiMurphK Offline
                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                    KiwiMurph
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #81

                    Advantage Australia again as Head is going full Bazball.

                    NTAN 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                      Advantage Australia again as Head is going full Bazball.

                      NTAN Offline
                      NTAN Offline
                      NTA
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #82

                      @KiwiMurph said in India v Aus:

                      Advantage Australia again as Head is going full Bazball.

                      Warner: try not to get out and protect my batting average

                      Head: fucking up this guy's bowling average is my jam

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • NTAN Offline
                        NTAN Offline
                        NTA
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #83

                        So from 1 for a few overnight, we're now fucked.

                        Fall of wickets: 1-23 (Usman Khawaja, 5.5 ov), 2-65 (Travis Head, 12.6 ov), 3-85 (Steven Smith, 18.6 ov), 4-95 (Marnus Labuschagne, 21.4 ov), 5-95 (Matt Renshaw, 22.6 ov), 6-95 (Peter Handscomb, 23.1 ov), 7-95 (Pat Cummins, 23.2 ov)

                        Fuck me.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • nzzpN Offline
                          nzzpN Offline
                          nzzp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #84

                          110/8. Far out.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • nzzpN Offline
                            nzzpN Offline
                            nzzp
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #85

                            Australia all out 113.
                            Jadeja 7/42
                            Ashwin 3/59

                            9 wickets in 90 minutes.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • NTAN Offline
                              NTAN Offline
                              NTA
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #86

                              Utter poo.

                              8b9c2140-9935-497e-a292-4dee093b660d-image.png

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • NTAN Offline
                                NTAN Offline
                                NTA
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #87

                                That said - look at this rubbish:

                                https://twitter.com/Zeus_Cricket/status/1627171847602335751?s=20

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                3
                                • NTAN Offline
                                  NTAN Offline
                                  NTA
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #88

                                  Counter-counter point: there were some terrible shots in that innings I might add. Sure that ball kept low, but why was he playing it off the back foot like that, KNOWING it would be shit?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurphK Offline
                                    KiwiMurph
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #89

                                    This could be an exciting finish.

                                    A lot of runs still to get.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurphK Offline
                                      KiwiMurph
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #90

                                      Can't help agree with Waugh - this is a very strange field setting - you need to be attacking to take wickets surely.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ChrisC Offline
                                        ChrisC Offline
                                        Chris
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #91

                                        332302775_513635497599711_7264278376569105535_n.jpg

                                        ACT CrusaderA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • ChrisC Chris

                                          332302775_513635497599711_7264278376569105535_n.jpg

                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT CrusaderA Offline
                                          ACT Crusader
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #92

                                          @Chris said in India v Aus:

                                          332302775_513635497599711_7264278376569105535_n.jpg

                                          I’m surprised Sportsbet did post their odds on “a sweep” in that tweet…

                                          antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search