Chiefs v Crusaders
-
DMac thinks he has to come up with a miracle play every time he gets the ball.
Settle down son.@Frank said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
DMac thinks he has to come up with a miracle play every time he gets the ball.
Settle down son.Interested to see if or how he adapts.
If he does, it'll show real progress.
-
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
-
Grace making a nuisance of himself
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
Regardless, any competent official has to go back to the initial infringement........
-
Narawa is starting to shape as a real contender.
-
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
@Bones said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
@antipodean said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
On replay it went forward from his hands, slightly. Not enough to overrule the initial play on call and for mine, certainly not egregious enough to rule out the try already awarded.
I don't get it. It went forward but it should be ignored because great try?
I don't think it was "clear and obvious".
-
There must be a better 15 in Sader land other than Burke.
-
There must be a better 15 in Sader land other than Burke.
@Jailbreak7 said in Chiefs v Crusaders:
There must be a better 15 in Sader land other than Burke.
Looks like a first five playing fullback. Tentative.
-
Moody reading the fern between scrums again..
-
Gardiner not a Saders fan lol
-
I thought Gardner handled that well.
