Australia v All Blacks - Bled I
-
Sam gets up like a granddad but still more effective now than Retallick IMO.
-
@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
That try should have been given.
9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction- When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
Party pooper!
That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.
@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
That try should have been given.
9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction- When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
Party pooper!
That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.
Then he needs to tackle him.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.
So he's not allowed to touch him.Which penalty do you choose?
-
@Chris said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Luke Jacobson putting in some decent clean out hits.
Would you say he has a "hard shoulder" on him?
-
Did Wayne finally notice a dummy runner obstructing? Wow.
-
Subliminal advertising ...
Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...
"Eddie's Favourites"
" Dark"
-
@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
That try should have been given.
9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction- When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
Party pooper!
That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.
Then he needs to tackle him.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.
So he's not allowed to touch him.Which penalty do you choose?
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
That try should have been given.
9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction- When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
Party pooper!
That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.
Then he needs to tackle him.
Wrong. Pushing a player with the ball isn't foul play.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.No he wasn't.
-
@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Subliminal advertising ...
Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...
"Eddie's Favourites"
" Dark"

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Subliminal advertising ...
Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...
"Eddie's Favourites"
" Dark"

Post of the night
-
@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
That try should have been given.
9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction- When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.
Party pooper!
That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.
Then he needs to tackle him.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.
So he's not allowed to touch him.Which penalty do you choose?
@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Pushing is not tackling.
It is according to vintage Quade Cooper.
-
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
-
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
You didn't even get 40.
Shit performance.
-
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
Easy?
Nup.
They were in it for the first 20 of both halves.
-
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.
@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:
Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical.
That's charitable. I'd say their defence was excellent most of the time and we looked lethargic.
Scott Barrett was dynamite.
MotM.
