Australia v All Blacks - Bled I

[NTA]

@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

That try should have been given.

9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction

1. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.

Party pooper!

That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.

Then he needs to tackle him.
Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.
So he's not allowed to touch him.

Which penalty do you choose?

[Chris]

@Steve
Yep

[nostrildamus]

Did Wayne finally notice a dummy runner obstructing? Wow.

[booboo]

Did Barnesy suggest they chop a coldie?

[canefan]

@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Subliminal advertising ...

Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...

"Eddie's Favourites"

" Dark"

[antipodean]

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@antipodean said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@Stargazer said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

That try should have been given.

9.1 Foul Play
Obstruction

1. When a player and an opponent are running for the ball, neither player may charge or push the other except shoulder-to-shoulder.

Party pooper!

That's not relevant. A player touching the ball is fair game.

Then he needs to tackle him.

Wrong. Pushing a player with the ball isn't foul play.

Pushing is not tackling.
And he was on the ground.

No he wasn't.

[booboo]

@canefan said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

@booboo said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Subliminal advertising ...

Cadbury in the background of the coach's box ...

"Eddie's Favourites"

" Dark"

Post of the night

[nostrildamus]

@NTA said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Pushing is not tackling.

It is according to vintage Quade Cooper.

[Canes4life]

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.

[Tim]

Did enough when it mattered. Forwards were a bit off as a collective tonight. Need to be better against France.

Another hiding for Eddie.

[NTA]

@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.

You didn't even get 40.

Shit performance.

[Tim]

Scott Barrett had a huge game.

[booboo]

@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.

Easy?

Nup.

They were in it for the first 20 of both halves.

[Unite]

That’s good for Foster, nice to hold the Bledisloe

[antipodean]

@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical.

That's charitable. I'd say their defence was excellent most of the time and we looked lethargic.

Scott Barrett was dynamite.

MotM.

[Tordah]

@Canes4life said in Australia v All Blacks - Bled I:

Far too easy. Aussies were disappointing. All Blacks were clinical. Scott Barrett was dynamite.

After the first 35 mins, yes. Scott Barrett was indeed superb. Retallick about the only player who played terribly. Wayne Barnes can suck my dead granddad's pecker

[sparky]

Australia did well for about 30 minutes, but there is a huge gulf in quality between these sides.

[Victor Meldrew]

Solid performance. Weathered the wobbles well, kept their heads and enacted Plan B. Stand-out players for sure, but the best thing for me was everybody played well. Roigard looked good.

Now we have the luxury of trying a few new players and combinations in Dunedin.

[Canes4life]

The lead up to that Ioane try was gold.

[antipodean]

Crowd dispersed amazingly quickly.