Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

RWC warmup - England v Wales

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
englandwales
120 Posts 26 Posters 4.9k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • TimT Tim

    https://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/nigel-owens-owen-farrell-tackle-27536840

    G Offline
    G Offline
    GibbonRib
    wrote on last edited by
    #96

    @Tim

    Yup, Owens is spot on here.

    The whole business is a compete disgrace. Andy Farrell whinging about the effect on his family is bullshit IMO. Yes there has been an unedifying pile on and OF's taken a heap of crap from commentators. But it is 100% deserved, and 90% self-inflicted - first by his cynical & dangerous tackle, and then compounded by him and the RFU deciding to appeal, refusing to accept guilt, and paying a fucking KC to run rings around the panel. Anyone involved with that spineless disciplinary panel should be squirming right now, they got played, and hopefully it'll be put right on appeal.

    The mitigation they came up with was nonsense, and as Nigel points out, even if there was any mitigation it can't be applied under the framework if the tackle was illegal from the start anyway.

    1 Reply Last reply
    5
    • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

      @chimoaus said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

      The team I feel sorry for is Scotland, they are likely to exit at the pool stage whereas one of these two will likely make a semi-final.

      It's cyclical

      They underperformed last time and got the seeding which was in place for ALL teams

      G Offline
      G Offline
      GibbonRib
      wrote on last edited by
      #97

      @MiketheSnow nah. Yeah they underperformed, but the problem is the draw being 3 years out from the event. Scotland have improved so much in the last 2-3 years, it's pretty daft that's not reflected in the pools.

      Should make for some great pool matches though.

      MiketheSnowM 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • G GibbonRib

        @MiketheSnow nah. Yeah they underperformed, but the problem is the draw being 3 years out from the event. Scotland have improved so much in the last 2-3 years, it's pretty daft that's not reflected in the pools.

        Should make for some great pool matches though.

        MiketheSnowM Offline
        MiketheSnowM Offline
        MiketheSnow
        wrote on last edited by
        #98

        @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

        @MiketheSnow nah. Yeah they underperformed, but the problem is the draw being 3 years out from the event. Scotland have improved so much in the last 2-3 years, it's pretty daft that's not reflected in the pools.

        Should make for some great pool matches though.

        Better for them to be knocked out at the pool stage by teams ranked higher than them than inferior opposition like Wales or Australia

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

          @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

          @MiketheSnow nah. Yeah they underperformed, but the problem is the draw being 3 years out from the event. Scotland have improved so much in the last 2-3 years, it's pretty daft that's not reflected in the pools.

          Should make for some great pool matches though.

          Better for them to be knocked out at the pool stage by teams ranked higher than them than inferior opposition like Wales or Australia

          G Offline
          G Offline
          GibbonRib
          wrote on last edited by
          #99

          @MiketheSnow Better still if Ireland are knocked out at the pool stage. At least Scotland are occasionally capable of making a semifinal

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • Victor MeldrewV Offline
            Victor MeldrewV Offline
            Victor Meldrew
            wrote on last edited by
            #100

            Reports that Farrell has been given a 4 match ban starting from the Ireland game last WE.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Billy TellB Offline
              Billy TellB Offline
              Billy Tell
              wrote on last edited by
              #101

              https://www.englandrugby.com/news/article/rwc23-summer-nations-series-owen-farrell-disciplinary-update

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sparkyS Offline
                sparkyS Offline
                sparky
                wrote on last edited by
                #102

                Farrell will miss England’s first two RWC pool games.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Machpants
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #103

                  The previous panel were fucking incompetent, it was always a shoulder charge, not tackle. Therefore no mitigation allowed, useless Ozzie fluffybunnies

                  antipodeanA 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • MajorPomM Offline
                    MajorPomM Offline
                    MajorPom
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #104

                    So the question now is what to do with those that rescinded the card?

                    Have to be off the payroll surely.

                    G 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • MiketheSnowM Offline
                      MiketheSnowM Offline
                      MiketheSnow
                      wrote on last edited by MiketheSnow
                      #105

                      Starting point is 6 matches

                      How the fuck did he get the reduction to 4?

                      Just fuck off World Rugby

                      You dropped the ball over the line

                      TordahT 1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • HigginsH Offline
                        HigginsH Offline
                        Higgins
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #106

                        And, what's worse, they are counting the match he missed against Ireland as one of the matches that count toward his suspension. Quite bizarre how this can happen when he missed selection for that game despite being completely free from suspension and available for selection at the time the game took place.

                        G 1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • MiketheSnowM MiketheSnow

                          Starting point is 6 matches

                          How the fuck did he get the reduction to 4?

                          Just fuck off World Rugby

                          You dropped the ball over the line

                          TordahT Offline
                          TordahT Offline
                          Tordah
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #107

                          @MiketheSnow said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                          Starting point is 6 matches

                          How the fuck did he get the reduction to 4?

                          Just fuck off World Rugby

                          You dropped the ball over the line

                          "good character", "apology", those mickey mouse factors. It's a ridiculous system

                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • TordahT Tordah

                            @MiketheSnow said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                            Starting point is 6 matches

                            How the fuck did he get the reduction to 4?

                            Just fuck off World Rugby

                            You dropped the ball over the line

                            "good character", "apology", those mickey mouse factors. It's a ridiculous system

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            GibbonRib
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #108

                            @Tordah
                            Good character, apart from the previous bans for the same thing, and remorse, after claiming he was innocent.

                            This is panel is less incompetent than the first one, but not by much.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • MajorPomM MajorPom

                              So the question now is what to do with those that rescinded the card?

                              Have to be off the payroll surely.

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              GibbonRib
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #109

                              @MajorRage that would be too harsh, I'm sure there were mitigating circumstances

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • HigginsH Higgins

                                And, what's worse, they are counting the match he missed against Ireland as one of the matches that count toward his suspension. Quite bizarre how this can happen when he missed selection for that game despite being completely free from suspension and available for selection at the time the game took place.

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                GibbonRib
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #110

                                @Higgins I think this is standard practice, so I'm less annoyed by the backdating than the fact that another panel has managed to pull some imaginary mitigation out of their arses.

                                Entry level is 6 weeks - if anything it should have gone up from there, due to "bad character" (plenty of previous), lack of remorse and pleading innocent.

                                Let's just say I'm sure that a Tongan, Namibian or Chilean wouldn't have got away with 4.

                                KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • G GibbonRib

                                  @Higgins I think this is standard practice, so I'm less annoyed by the backdating than the fact that another panel has managed to pull some imaginary mitigation out of their arses.

                                  Entry level is 6 weeks - if anything it should have gone up from there, due to "bad character" (plenty of previous), lack of remorse and pleading innocent.

                                  Let's just say I'm sure that a Tongan, Namibian or Chilean wouldn't have got away with 4.

                                  KiwiMurphK Online
                                  KiwiMurphK Online
                                  KiwiMurph
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #111

                                  @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                                  Let's just say I'm sure that a Tongan, Namibian or Chilean wouldn't have got away with 4.

                                  Moala got mitigated down to 5 weeks from 10 weeks entry point (which he is now appealing)

                                  G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                    @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                                    Let's just say I'm sure that a Tongan, Namibian or Chilean wouldn't have got away with 4.

                                    Moala got mitigated down to 5 weeks from 10 weeks entry point (which he is now appealing)

                                    G Offline
                                    G Offline
                                    GibbonRib
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #112

                                    @KiwiMurph have to admit I haven't seen that one, I should go look it up.

                                    Not sure if you're saying this in agreement or disagreement with my comment?

                                    KiwiMurphK 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G GibbonRib

                                      @KiwiMurph have to admit I haven't seen that one, I should go look it up.

                                      Not sure if you're saying this in agreement or disagreement with my comment?

                                      KiwiMurphK Online
                                      KiwiMurphK Online
                                      KiwiMurph
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #113

                                      @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                                      @KiwiMurph have to admit I haven't seen that one, I should go look it up.

                                      Not sure if you're saying this in agreement or disagreement with my comment?

                                      Disagreement. Moala got 50% mitigation reduction.

                                      Farrell got 33% mitigation reduction (due to his prior record so not eligible for tackle school).

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • KiwiMurphK KiwiMurph

                                        @GibbonRib said in RWC warmup - England v Wales:

                                        @KiwiMurph have to admit I haven't seen that one, I should go look it up.

                                        Not sure if you're saying this in agreement or disagreement with my comment?

                                        Disagreement. Moala got 50% mitigation reduction.

                                        Farrell got 33% mitigation reduction (due to his prior record so not eligible for tackle school).

                                        G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        GibbonRib
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #114

                                        @KiwiMurph correction: Farrell got a 100% reduction - he was, astoundingly, found to have not committed a red card offence.

                                        It took a big backlash from the global rugby community, including plenty of English press and former players, and an appeal from WR for him to actually receive any sanction, and even then he got a 33% reduction.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Machpants
                                          wrote on last edited by Machpants
                                          #115

                                          Farrell was initially given a six-match ban, reduced to four due to his “acceptance of foul play, clear demonstration of remorse and his good character”.

                                          At least the two games missed are England's toughest, Argentina and Japan

                                          G 1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search