• Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

RWC QF: France v South Africa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rugby Matches
francespringboks
833 Posts 68 Posters 51.1k Views
RWC QF: France v South Africa
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chimoausC Offline
    chimoausC Offline
    chimoaus
    replied to Canes4life on last edited by
    #701

    @Canes4life said in RWC QF: France v South Africa:

    The angle no one saw. Bloody questionable.

    74K views · 13K reactions | The angle you didn't see 😳 #rugby...

    74K views · 13K reactions | The angle you didn't see 😳 #rugby...

    The angle you didn't see 😳 #rugby #rugbyworldcup #worldcup #springboks #cheslinkolbe #sarugby #motivation.

    I thought it odd at the time they did not check it, perhaps they simply did not have the footage but you would think that would be standard. Anytime someone can block a conversion surely they need to check if they were onside. I guess we will never know if he would have kicked the conversion but that is not the point. I do wonder if they will introduce the offside technology they use in soccer in Rugby when chasing kicks etc.

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to canefan on last edited by
    #702

    @canefan Ramos has a slow run up and kicking action. He'll be working on that for sure!

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    wrote on last edited by
    #703

    About 5 pages behind, but in the meantime ...

    ... watching Between Two Posts on Stan.

    25.25 in they show the Kolbe charge down end on.

    I reckon he's bang on the split second as Ramos lifts his right foot.

    I'm saying the chargedown was fair.

    Hate myself.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    wrote on last edited by
    #704

    i guess the question is when does Ramos start his run up, did he move in any direction before Kolbe crossed the white wash - i am not sure he did, but i'm not certain he didn't

    W 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to NTA on last edited by booboo
    #705

    @NTA said in RWC QF: France v South Africa:

    @game_film ok so who is the best player in the world?

    Whilst I know you're getting shit answers I'll try and be serious ...

    ... if I could take one guy from the other teams ... After long and considered err consideration...

    ... Etsebeth.

    And that's even with our talent at lock. Not sure who I would drop though.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #706

    @booboo we should probably all get together over drinks and canapés and decide this in 2 weeks, no?

    boobooB 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • boobooB Offline
    boobooB Offline
    booboo
    replied to game_film on last edited by
    #707

    @game_film said in RWC QF: France v South Africa:

    @booboo we should probably all get together over drinks and canapés and decide this in 2 weeks, no?

    Fair.

    But right here, right now?

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by pakman
    #708

    Parsons at 16.13. Smith hand on ground, which BOK didn't see. Correct decision penalty France:

    So we have endless replays for non-scoring events, but TMO can't tell ref he made a clear mistake? With ten to play in RWC quarter!

    France only had themselves to blame for not taking that, but completely sympathise with ADP's view of reffing.

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    wrote on last edited by
    #709

    Lots of French whinging but in the sequences several clear misses by BOK. What it explains is how Bok breakdown work was so effective in last 25. Suspect a NH ref would have killed them.

    S boobooB 2 Replies Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #710

    @pakman 26:22 - SA using "rolling subs". Can coaches call for an HIA via their team doctor?

    World Rugby need to cut comms between team doctors and coaches. It needs to be an independent assessment so that the integrity of the sport is not compromised. Team doctors are not there tactically!

    Bok coaches are not doing anything illegal, but I can't imagine this "clever thinking" will be allowed to stand post this world cup.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to pakman on last edited by
    #711

    @pakman 2023...2007 revenge of the Kiwis 😃

    (joking if there are any French fans lurking)

    NZ had a similar video in 2007 in the QF against France. I didn't hear any French players, coaches and supporters complaining about the rub of the green.

    Regarding the transgressions in the video, I did agree with a fair number of them, especially the Boks sealing antics at the breakdown which I think will get them in bother on another day. I thought Etzebeth's knock back was borderline, but I thought that he was lucky to get yellow for the head contact.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    wrote on last edited by
    #712

    have to say, i noticed most of them during the game, not just when they're slowed down. Wonder what BOK's review was like after the game, if some of that ruck work and leading with forearms was highlighted to him then i'd expect him to be stricter on both teams on Saturday. Doesn't bode well for Tuilagi...

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    3
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    wrote on last edited by
    #713

    So many misses at the breakdown from BOK to be fair

    At critical times in excellent field position

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to Dodge on last edited by
    #714

    @Dodge or PSDT or Kriel 😃

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by
    #715

    @MiketheSnow Now do one focusing solely on the French. Given the possession/territory stats, I'd wager there were fewer incidents, but I bet there were some.

    Big calls were:

    1. Etzebeth knock down - debatable. If forward, penalty try and yellow card

    2. Etzebeth head contact - BOK did his part, the bunker decided it wasn't a red

    The Boks gave the French a taste of their lazy rolling, ruck flopping medicine. I'm not feeling much sympathy for them given how often they get away with it themselves 😃

    P D MiketheSnowM 3 Replies Last reply
    4
  • P Offline
    P Offline
    pakman
    replied to stodders on last edited by pakman
    #716

    @stodders Yes, I expect Rassie could also find a few French indiscretions which BOK missed!

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    Dodge
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #717

    @stodders said in RWC QF: France v South Africa:

    @MiketheSnow Now do one focusing solely on the French. Given the possession/territory stats, I'd wager there were fewer incidents, but I bet there were some.

    Big calls were:

    1. Etzebeth knock down - debatable. If forward, penalty try and yellow card

    2. Etzebeth head contact - BOK did his part, the bunker decided it wasn't a red

    The Boks gave the French a taste of their lazy rolling, ruck flopping medicine. I'm not feeling much sympathy for them given how often they get away with it themselves 😃

    this is exactly the point i've made elsewhere. The winners very rarely bother...

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    game_film
    replied to booboo on last edited by
    #718

    @booboo Ardie. I can’t argue with EE though.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnowM Offline
    MiketheSnow
    replied to stodders on last edited by
    #719

    @stodders said in RWC QF: France v South Africa:

    @MiketheSnow Now do one focusing solely on the French. Given the possession/territory stats, I'd wager there were fewer incidents, but I bet there were some.

    Big calls were:

    1. Etzebeth knock down - debatable. If forward, penalty try and yellow card

    2. Etzebeth head contact - BOK did his part, the bunker decided it wasn't a red

    The Boks gave the French a taste of their lazy rolling, ruck flopping medicine. I'm not feeling much sympathy for them given how often they get away with it themselves 😃

    Oh absolutely

    I'm sure there are plenty

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    stodders
    replied to MiketheSnow on last edited by stodders
    #720

    @MiketheSnow BOK gave the French plenty of chances to play. He gave them some of the rub of the green too. As he did the Boks. He didn't knock the ball on or drop the expected barrage of high kicks, last time i checked.

    If France had caught the ball twice and the prop had not tried to flick the ball that was bobbling on the ground (dive on it!), SA would not have had the chance to score the first 3 of their tries. Unfortunately for them, they did and they SA were good enough to capitalise.

    Ireland said NZ sucker punched them with their 3rd try on Saturday from first phase. The first 3 SA tries were a trio of sucker punches lovingly gift wrapped by the French through high ball ineptitude. I mean, they must have known the kicks were going to come, no?

    MiketheSnowM nostrildamusN 2 Replies Last reply
    8

RWC QF: France v South Africa
Rugby Matches
francespringboks
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.