Black Caps v South Africa
-
Good pace by O’Rourke in his debut quickest ball was 143.8 kms he hit 140ks plus a number of balls.
@Chris said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Good pace by O’Rourke in his debut quickest ball was 143.8 kms he hit 140ks plus a number of balls.
Would this be the first time O'Rourke would have played or trained with full ball tracking? e.g. cricviz (i think).
In radio comms yesterday, mentioned that his LBW was one of only 3 balls he bowled that was hitting the stumps (this was part way through the day). Not sure if they were just talking about his first spell, or at that point of the day I think he had bowled 2 spells.
I'm wondering if he would have had that level of detailed feedback (ball-tracking) before? Can assume the rate of improvement must be huge once start getting that.
-
@Chris said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Good pace by O’Rourke in his debut quickest ball was 143.8 kms he hit 140ks plus a number of balls.
Would this be the first time O'Rourke would have played or trained with full ball tracking? e.g. cricviz (i think).
In radio comms yesterday, mentioned that his LBW was one of only 3 balls he bowled that was hitting the stumps (this was part way through the day). Not sure if they were just talking about his first spell, or at that point of the day I think he had bowled 2 spells.
I'm wondering if he would have had that level of detailed feedback (ball-tracking) before? Can assume the rate of improvement must be huge once start getting that.
@Rapido said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
@Chris said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Good pace by O’Rourke in his debut quickest ball was 143.8 kms he hit 140ks plus a number of balls.
Would this be the first time O'Rourke would have played or trained with full ball tracking? e.g. cricviz (i think).
In radio comms yesterday, mentioned that his LBW was one of only 3 balls he bowled that was hitting the stumps (this was part way through the day). Not sure if they were just talking about his first spell, or at that point of the day I think he had bowled 2 spells.
I'm wondering if he would have had that level of detailed feedback (ball-tracking) before? Can assume the rate of improvement must be huge once start getting that.
I am not sure How often Will has been under a controlled environment using that technology in NZ.
I couple of times in Australia he has.We have found the improvement is Hugh we use it in conjunction with video analysis to breakdown the bowling action under stress for injury prevention, as well as a breakdown of consistency of the bowling action.
Understanding what changes of action occurs when speeds drop off or in crease.It gives the bowler a better understanding of what happens to the action as they get tired and what stress then converts to the body.
It obviously gives the bowler a better understanding of consistency of their actions when bowling at top pace.
Bowlers of course know where they pitch the ball varies the pace but when they hit their high speeds what is aligned in their bowling action.The bowlers certainly pick up pace and can sustain it for longer periods we have found with consistent training using both training technology.
-
Jeremy Coney and Grant Elliot really are outstanding in commentary.
In between some bloody astute analysis they’re telling some pretty amusing anecdotes about Colin De Grandholmes dog that failed police school.
I guess you have to hear it but by golly the Mantis has some endearing wit about him. With Bryan Waddle gone he’s our best Radio commentator by far. Long may he continue !
-
Good start to the morning. Ball doing a little so will probably be tough hour through to lunch. If we can get through that I think we'll be pretty well positioned for a similar day to day 1 in the first test (in that we'll have two fairly slow scoring sessions and look to accelerate through session 3).
-
Conway needs a stint back in domestic cricket to find some form and confidence.
We can’t carry him against Aussie.
-
Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins all got erections watching that.
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins all got erections watching that.
Starc will be bowling 20kmh faster and the ball will be coming from a foot or two higher trajectory. It's hard to see Devon playing his way into form against that attack. Usually it's our form players who play themselves out of form vs Oz.
Paterson is really an old school stock bowler who should be meat and drink to our openers.
I wonder whether we should push Tom Blundell back into opening and bring in another keeper?
-
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins all got erections watching that.
Starc will be bowling 20kmh faster and the ball will be coming from a foot or two higher trajectory. It's hard to see Devon playing his way into form against that attack. Usually it's our form players who play themselves out of form vs Oz.
Paterson is really an old school stock bowler who should be meat and drink to our openers.
I wonder whether we should push Tom Blundell back into opening and bring in another keeper?
@Chris-B said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
@mariner4life said in Black Caps v South Africa Tests:
Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins all got erections watching that.
Starc will be bowling 20kmh faster and the ball will be coming from a foot or two higher trajectory. It's hard to see Devon playing his way into form against that attack. Usually it's our form players who play themselves out of form vs Oz.
Paterson is really an old school stock bowler who should be meat and drink to our openers.
I wonder whether we should push Tom Blundell back into opening and bring in another keeper?
No.
His runs have dried up of late batting at six ( high score of 17 not out in nine innings )
You really think he’d go any better opening against that Aussie bowling attack ?
I think we’re at the point where Young gets a go no matter how Conway goes in the second innings.
