Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse

The Silver Fern

  • Tipping
  • Team Sheets
  • Highlights
  • Results
    • All Blacks

      Search every All Blacks Test. Filter results by year, opposition, location, venue, city and RWC stage

    • Super Rugby

      Search every Super Rugby since match 1996

    • NPC

      Search NPC results. Only first division matches from 1976-2005. All results from the 14 team competition (2006-present) are included

Super Rugby 2025

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Sports Talk
1.1k Posts 81 Posters 81.6k Views 3 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • YeetyaahY Offline
    YeetyaahY Offline
    Yeetyaah
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    If 3v4 is the final game of the QFs and both seed 1 and 2 have won, both teams could rest their players and be fresh for the SF, no integrity there at all.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • Canes4lifeC Online
      Canes4lifeC Online
      Canes4life
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

      YeetyaahY DuluthD Dan54D 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

        How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

        YeetyaahY Offline
        YeetyaahY Offline
        Yeetyaah
        wrote on last edited by
        #28

        @Canes4life It's whoever is the highest seed, so if 1 loses, they get another crack in the SF guarenteed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • gt12G Offline
          gt12G Offline
          gt12
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.

          YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
          7
          • ChrisC Offline
            ChrisC Offline
            Chris
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            That is a crazy play off system just adds to more confusion.
            It could work out the 3 v 4 play of game could mean nothing.
            They have over thought this format.

            Dan54D 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

              How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

              DuluthD Offline
              DuluthD Offline
              Duluth
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

              How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

              The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

              Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

              YeetyaahY 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                Machpants
                wrote on last edited by Machpants
                #32

                I don't mind it as a week off can be detrimental. So this means if you grind you way to the top of the ladder and have a bad day on quarters you still get rewarded with a semi
                EDIT: as long as, as pointed out, the 3/4 play off is first

                1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • gt12G gt12

                  It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.

                  YeetyaahY Offline
                  YeetyaahY Offline
                  Yeetyaah
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  @gt12 said in Super Rugby 2025:

                  It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.

                  Exactly, they can blar on about the comp not getting bums on seats all they want, but when they make dumb decisions like this you have to wonder if they're guiding it to its own death. How fucking dumb are these fluffybunnies that run this show.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • DuluthD Duluth

                    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

                    How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

                    The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

                    Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

                    YeetyaahY Offline
                    YeetyaahY Offline
                    Yeetyaah
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

                    @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

                    How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

                    The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

                    Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

                    When was the last time 1st lost to the bottom seed? Or even 2nd losing to the second from bottom seed? The stupidity here comes from the 3v4 potentially being a dead rubber.

                    DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • YeetyaahY Yeetyaah

                      @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

                      @Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:

                      How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.

                      The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance

                      Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity

                      When was the last time 1st lost to the bottom seed? Or even 2nd losing to the second from bottom seed? The stupidity here comes from the 3v4 potentially being a dead rubber.

                      DuluthD Offline
                      DuluthD Offline
                      Duluth
                      wrote on last edited by Duluth
                      #35

                      @Yeetyaah

                      Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

                      Is it?

                      Canes4lifeC 1 Reply Last reply
                      1
                      • DuluthD Duluth

                        @Yeetyaah

                        Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

                        Is it?

                        Canes4lifeC Online
                        Canes4lifeC Online
                        Canes4life
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

                        @Yeetyaah

                        Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

                        Is it?

                        We won't know this until the schedule is released in a couple weeks. If it's scheduled first then I get their decision making but if it's scheduled last then they are morons.

                        DuluthD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Canes4lifeC Canes4life

                          @Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:

                          @Yeetyaah

                          Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last

                          Is it?

                          We won't know this until the schedule is released in a couple weeks. If it's scheduled first then I get their decision making but if it's scheduled last then they are morons.

                          DuluthD Offline
                          DuluthD Offline
                          Duluth
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          @Canes4life

                          Second is ok too

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • KirwanK Offline
                            KirwanK Offline
                            Kirwan
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            I like that system. The key is for it to be retained as they grow the teams back out.

                            It's not that complex, rewards teams for finishing higher on the table, only a top 6. I like.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • YeetyaahY Offline
                              YeetyaahY Offline
                              Yeetyaah
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              The last time a top qualifier lost to the bottom qualifier was Super 12 in 1999 when the Crusaders beat the Reds.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • gt12G Offline
                                gt12G Offline
                                gt12
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                If the number 1 seed loses in the first week, do they also lose their home field advantage? They should do - whoever loses should automatically be the 4th seed.

                                Daffy JaffyD Chris B.C 2 Replies Last reply
                                3
                                • BovidaeB Offline
                                  BovidaeB Offline
                                  Bovidae
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of seven home games and seven away games, and be allocated two byes.

                                  I am happy that there will be an equal number of home and away games, assuming that there is no Super Round to fuck things up again.

                                  Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry match-ups, and the six remaining teams once

                                  Let's wait to see the details.

                                  Also, there will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games. I wonder who will get those games?

                                  And, SR starts a week earlier (Friday 14 February).

                                  gt12G 1 Reply Last reply
                                  1
                                  • BovidaeB Bovidae

                                    Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of seven home games and seven away games, and be allocated two byes.

                                    I am happy that there will be an equal number of home and away games, assuming that there is no Super Round to fuck things up again.

                                    Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry match-ups, and the six remaining teams once

                                    Let's wait to see the details.

                                    Also, there will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games. I wonder who will get those games?

                                    And, SR starts a week earlier (Friday 14 February).

                                    gt12G Offline
                                    gt12G Offline
                                    gt12
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #42

                                    @Bovidae

                                    Don't get too excited, they say they'll bring it ack the following year.

                                    I'm sure all of Perth will turn out to see every team there over three days.

                                    What a fucking stupid idea.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • KiwiMurphK Online
                                      KiwiMurphK Online
                                      KiwiMurph
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      I don't like it

                                      Just have a top 6 where the top 2 get a first round playoff bye

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • KiwiwombleK Online
                                        KiwiwombleK Online
                                        Kiwiwomble
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        is it better than top 8?....yes....could it have been better...also yes

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gt12G gt12

                                          If the number 1 seed loses in the first week, do they also lose their home field advantage? They should do - whoever loses should automatically be the 4th seed.

                                          Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                          Daffy JaffyD Offline
                                          Daffy Jaffy
                                          wrote on last edited by Daffy Jaffy
                                          #45

                                          @gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.

                                          They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
                                          The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! .

                                          gt12G KiwiwombleK 2 Replies Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Search
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Search