Super Rugby 2025
-
How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:
How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.
The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance
Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity
-
-
@gt12 said in Super Rugby 2025:
It's impressive how super rugby can come up with new ways of making the competition worse.
Exactly, they can blar on about the comp not getting bums on seats all they want, but when they make dumb decisions like this you have to wonder if they're guiding it to its own death. How fucking dumb are these fluffybunnies that run this show.
-
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:
How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.
The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance
Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity
@Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:
How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.
The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance
Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity
When was the last time 1st lost to the bottom seed? Or even 2nd losing to the second from bottom seed? The stupidity here comes from the 3v4 potentially being a dead rubber.
-
@Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:
@Canes4life said in Super Rugby 2025:
How do they determine a lucky loser? If the top seed is knocked out, surely they should get a second bite of the cherry. What a shambles.
The article says it's the highest seeded loser. So if the top seed losses, yes they have a second chance
Seems fine to me. I don't understand the negativity
When was the last time 1st lost to the bottom seed? Or even 2nd losing to the second from bottom seed? The stupidity here comes from the 3v4 potentially being a dead rubber.
-
@Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:
Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last
Is it?
We won't know this until the schedule is released in a couple weeks. If it's scheduled first then I get their decision making but if it's scheduled last then they are morons.
-
@Duluth said in Super Rugby 2025:
Your complaint only makes sense if that game is scheduled last
Is it?
We won't know this until the schedule is released in a couple weeks. If it's scheduled first then I get their decision making but if it's scheduled last then they are morons.
Second is ok too
-
Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of seven home games and seven away games, and be allocated two byes.
I am happy that there will be an equal number of home and away games, assuming that there is no Super Round to fuck things up again.
Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry match-ups, and the six remaining teams once
Let's wait to see the details.
Also, there will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games. I wonder who will get those games?
And, SR starts a week earlier (Friday 14 February).
-
Teams will play 14 regular season matches, consisting of seven home games and seven away games, and be allocated two byes.
I am happy that there will be an equal number of home and away games, assuming that there is no Super Round to fuck things up again.
Teams will play four teams twice, with a focus on rivalry match-ups, and the six remaining teams once
Let's wait to see the details.
Also, there will be three family-friendly Sunday afternoon games. I wonder who will get those games?
And, SR starts a week earlier (Friday 14 February).
-
is it better than top 8?....yes....could it have been better...also yes
-
If the number 1 seed loses in the first week, do they also lose their home field advantage? They should do - whoever loses should automatically be the 4th seed.
@gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.
They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! . -
@gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.
They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! .@Daffy-Jaffy said in Super Rugby 2025:
@gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.
They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still getting a home semi ! .Firstly, points off for reading the article
Secondly, WTAF?
-
@gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.
They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! .@Daffy-Jaffy said in Super Rugby 2025:
@gt12 "The three winners of the Qualifying Finals will progress to the Semi-Finals.
They will be joined by the highest-seeded losing team (the ‘lucky loser’), who will drop one seeding for the Semi-Final draw."
The way this reads if the top seed loses they only drop to 2nd so still get a home semi ! .why is that necessary? (asking the world, not you @Daffy-Jaffy )....they have seedings already...why do we need to add a second level of complexity?
-
This is the result of setting up a dedicated, independent commission?
@antipodean said in Super Rugby 2025:
This is the result of setting up a dedicated, independent commission?
